Matthews International Corporation (MATW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Matthews International Corporation (MATW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-15.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.02 Billion) in one year. Explore Matthews International Corporation (MATW) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Matthews International Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Matthews International Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore MATW total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Matthews International Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Matthews International Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Matthews International Corporation market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-23.55 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -134.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $79.28 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $79.52 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $126.86 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $162.81 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $180.45 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $131.08 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $147.57 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $149.30 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $140.27 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $141.06 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $92.40 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $109.33 Million | $662.00 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $82.12 Million | $637.13 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $95.56 Million | $629.36 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $106.49 Million | $500.10 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $90.86 Million | $483.64 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $104.54 Million | $449.44 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $74.60 Million | $344.29 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $66.08 Million | $323.67 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $73.43 Million | $327.71 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $83.27 Million | $218.29 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $58.49 Million | $180.51 Million | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $55.48 Million | $241.23 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $38.40 Million | $145.24 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2000 | 0.40x | $37.97 Million | $93.81 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $27.77 Million | $111.10 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $34.80 Million | $82.90 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $37.50 Million | $65.00 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $19.20 Million | $50.90 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1995 | 0.39x | $20.20 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1994 | 0.42x | $20.40 Million | $48.20 Million | — |