Matthews International Corporation (MATW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Matthews International Corporation (MATW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-15.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.02 Billion) in one year. See Matthews International Corporation (MATW) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Matthews International Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Matthews International Corporation across 32 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Matthews International Corporation cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Matthews International Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Matthews International Corporation. Check MATW cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-23.55 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -134.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $79.28 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $79.52 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $126.86 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $162.81 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $180.45 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $131.08 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $147.57 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $149.30 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $140.27 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $141.06 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $92.40 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $109.33 Million | $662.00 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $82.12 Million | $637.13 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $95.56 Million | $629.36 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $106.49 Million | $500.10 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $90.86 Million | $483.64 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $104.54 Million | $449.44 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $74.60 Million | $344.29 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $66.08 Million | $323.67 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $73.43 Million | $327.71 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $83.27 Million | $218.29 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $58.49 Million | $180.51 Million | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $55.48 Million | $241.23 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $38.40 Million | $145.24 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2000 | 0.40x | $37.97 Million | $93.81 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $27.77 Million | $111.10 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $34.80 Million | $82.90 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $37.50 Million | $65.00 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $19.20 Million | $50.90 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1995 | 0.39x | $20.20 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1994 | 0.42x | $20.40 Million | $48.20 Million | — |