Matthews International Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Matthews International Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Matthews International Corporation (MATW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-15.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.02 Billion) in one year. Check Matthews International Corporation (MATW) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Matthews International Corporation (1994–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Matthews International Corporation from 1994 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Matthews International Corporation across 32 annual periods. Check Matthews International Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Matthews International Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2025)
Matthews International Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Matthews International Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Matthews International Corporation generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-23.55 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -134.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $79.28 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $79.52 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $126.86 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $162.81 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $180.45 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $131.08 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $147.57 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $149.30 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $140.27 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $141.06 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $92.40 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $109.33 Million | $662.00 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $82.12 Million | $637.13 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $95.56 Million | $629.36 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $106.49 Million | $500.10 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $90.86 Million | $483.64 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $104.54 Million | $449.44 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $74.60 Million | $344.29 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $66.08 Million | $323.67 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $73.43 Million | $327.71 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $83.27 Million | $218.29 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $58.49 Million | $180.51 Million | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $55.48 Million | $241.23 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $38.40 Million | $145.24 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2000 | 0.40x | $37.97 Million | $93.81 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $27.77 Million | $111.10 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $34.80 Million | $82.90 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $37.50 Million | $65.00 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $19.20 Million | $50.90 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1995 | 0.39x | $20.20 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1994 | 0.42x | $20.40 Million | $48.20 Million | — |