Matthews International Corporation (MATW) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Matthews International Corporation (MATW) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-15.44 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.02 Billion) in one year. See MATW cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Matthews International Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Matthews International Corporation across 32 annual periods. Also explore Matthews International Corporation (MATW) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Matthews International Corporation (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Matthews International Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MATW company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.02x | $-23.55 Million | $1.21 Billion | ▼ -134.2% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $79.28 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -2.8% |
| 2023 | 0.06x | $79.52 Million | $1.36 Billion | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $126.86 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -22.1% |
| 2021 | 0.12x | $162.81 Million | $1.40 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $180.45 Million | $1.46 Billion | ▲ +38.6% |
| 2019 | 0.09x | $131.08 Million | $1.47 Billion | ▼ -9.0% |
| 2018 | 0.10x | $147.57 Million | $1.51 Billion | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $149.30 Million | $1.45 Billion | ▲ +1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $140.27 Million | $1.38 Billion | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2015 | 0.10x | $141.06 Million | $1.43 Billion | ▲ +33.4% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $92.40 Million | $1.25 Billion | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $109.33 Million | $662.00 Million | ▲ +28.1% |
| 2012 | 0.13x | $82.12 Million | $637.13 Million | ▼ -15.1% |
| 2011 | 0.15x | $95.56 Million | $629.36 Million | ▼ -28.7% |
| 2010 | 0.21x | $106.49 Million | $500.10 Million | ▲ +13.3% |
| 2009 | 0.19x | $90.86 Million | $483.64 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2008 | 0.23x | $104.54 Million | $449.44 Million | ▲ +7.4% |
| 2007 | 0.22x | $74.60 Million | $344.29 Million | ▲ +6.1% |
| 2006 | 0.20x | $66.08 Million | $323.67 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2005 | 0.22x | $73.43 Million | $327.71 Million | ▼ -41.3% |
| 2004 | 0.38x | $83.27 Million | $218.29 Million | ▲ +17.7% |
| 2003 | 0.32x | $58.49 Million | $180.51 Million | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2002 | 0.23x | $55.48 Million | $241.23 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $38.40 Million | $145.24 Million | ▼ -34.7% |
| 2000 | 0.40x | $37.97 Million | $93.81 Million | ▲ +61.9% |
| 1999 | 0.25x | $27.77 Million | $111.10 Million | ▼ -40.4% |
| 1998 | 0.42x | $34.80 Million | $82.90 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1997 | 0.58x | $37.50 Million | $65.00 Million | ▲ +52.9% |
| 1996 | 0.38x | $19.20 Million | $50.90 Million | ▼ -4.0% |
| 1995 | 0.39x | $20.20 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 1994 | 0.42x | $20.40 Million | $48.20 Million | — |