Middleby Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Middleby Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. Middleby Corp (MIDD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $97.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.15 Billion) in one year. Check MIDD cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Middleby Corp (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Middleby Corp from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Middleby Corp across 36 annual periods. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Middleby Corp to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Middleby Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Middleby Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Middleby Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MIDD cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $630.20 Million | $3.54 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $686.82 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $628.79 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +110.8% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $332.55 Million | $4.08 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $423.40 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $524.78 Million | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $377.43 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $368.91 Million | $2.88 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $304.45 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $294.11 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $249.59 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $233.88 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $146.16 Million | $980.86 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $128.35 Million | $594.25 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $130.39 Million | $635.54 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $97.95 Million | $448.26 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $100.77 Million | $473.69 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $85.35 Million | $426.54 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $59.49 Million | $228.17 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2006 | 0.27x | $50.07 Million | $184.45 Million | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | $42.26 Million | $215.42 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $18.52 Million | $202.46 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $29.79 Million | $132.53 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $19.53 Million | $163.33 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $13.35 Million | $158.55 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $17.65 Million | $40.85 Million | ▲ +146.1% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $9.80 Million | $55.80 Million | ▲ +296.3% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $2.30 Million | $51.90 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $1.90 Million | $48.80 Million | ▲ +499.6% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $400.00K | $61.60 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $5.30 Million | $66.80 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $5.40 Million | $66.80 Million | ▲ +228.8% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | $-4.30 Million | $68.50 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 1992 | -0.06x | $-4.50 Million | $78.80 Million | ▼ -278.3% |
| 1991 | 0.03x | $2.70 Million | $84.30 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 1990 | 0.04x | $3.70 Million | $82.60 Million | — |