Middleby Corp (MIDD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Middleby Corp (MIDD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $190.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($3.54 Billion) in one year. Explore Middleby Corp long-term investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Middleby Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Middleby Corp across 36 annual periods. Also explore Middleby Corp (MIDD) total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Middleby Corp (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Middleby Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Middleby Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $630.20 Million | $3.54 Billion | ▼ -5.5% |
| 2024 | 0.19x | $686.82 Million | $3.64 Billion | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2023 | 0.17x | $628.79 Million | $3.66 Billion | ▲ +110.8% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $332.55 Million | $4.08 Billion | ▼ -25.1% |
| 2021 | 0.11x | $423.40 Million | $3.89 Billion | ▼ -33.1% |
| 2020 | 0.16x | $524.78 Million | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +31.7% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $377.43 Million | $3.06 Billion | ▼ -3.4% |
| 2018 | 0.13x | $368.91 Million | $2.88 Billion | ▼ -16.9% |
| 2017 | 0.15x | $304.45 Million | $1.98 Billion | ▼ -13.6% |
| 2016 | 0.18x | $294.11 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +13.7% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $249.59 Million | $1.59 Billion | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $233.88 Million | $1.06 Billion | ▲ +48.2% |
| 2013 | 0.15x | $146.16 Million | $980.86 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 2012 | 0.22x | $128.35 Million | $594.25 Million | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $130.39 Million | $635.54 Million | ▼ -6.1% |
| 2010 | 0.22x | $97.95 Million | $448.26 Million | ▲ +2.7% |
| 2009 | 0.21x | $100.77 Million | $473.69 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2008 | 0.20x | $85.35 Million | $426.54 Million | ▼ -23.3% |
| 2007 | 0.26x | $59.49 Million | $228.17 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2006 | 0.27x | $50.07 Million | $184.45 Million | ▲ +38.4% |
| 2005 | 0.20x | $42.26 Million | $215.42 Million | ▲ +114.4% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $18.52 Million | $202.46 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2003 | 0.22x | $29.79 Million | $132.53 Million | ▲ +88.0% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $19.53 Million | $163.33 Million | ▲ +42.0% |
| 2001 | 0.08x | $13.35 Million | $158.55 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2000 | 0.43x | $17.65 Million | $40.85 Million | ▲ +146.1% |
| 1999 | 0.18x | $9.80 Million | $55.80 Million | ▲ +296.3% |
| 1998 | 0.04x | $2.30 Million | $51.90 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 1997 | 0.04x | $1.90 Million | $48.80 Million | ▲ +499.6% |
| 1996 | 0.01x | $400.00K | $61.60 Million | ▼ -91.8% |
| 1995 | 0.08x | $5.30 Million | $66.80 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1994 | 0.08x | $5.40 Million | $66.80 Million | ▲ +228.8% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | $-4.30 Million | $68.50 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 1992 | -0.06x | $-4.50 Million | $78.80 Million | ▼ -278.3% |
| 1991 | 0.03x | $2.70 Million | $84.30 Million | ▼ -28.5% |
| 1990 | 0.04x | $3.70 Million | $82.60 Million | — |