Mind Technology Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mind Technology Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mind Technology Inc (MIND) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $894.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.40 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Mind Technology Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mind Technology Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mind Technology Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mind Technology Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Mind Technology Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Mind Technology Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
Mind Technology Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mind Technology Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Mind Technology Inc cash conversion from operations.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $651.00K | $9.39 Million | ▲ +115.1% |
| 2024 | -0.46x | $-4.97 Million | $10.85 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-2.90 Million | $9.81 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2022 | -1.46x | $-17.13 Million | $11.76 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2021 | -0.68x | $-6.36 Million | $9.35 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2020 | -0.55x | $-5.82 Million | $10.58 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2019 | -0.63x | $-5.46 Million | $8.62 Million | ▼ -789.2% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $719.00K | $7.83 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $3.15 Million | $13.78 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2016 | 0.50x | $14.92 Million | $29.72 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2015 | 0.76x | $25.20 Million | $33.14 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2014 | 0.61x | $21.21 Million | $34.97 Million | ▼ -80.7% |
| 2013 | 3.14x | $44.26 Million | $14.09 Million | ▲ +273.7% |
| 2012 | 0.84x | $35.96 Million | $42.80 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2011 | 0.70x | $30.14 Million | $43.26 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2010 | 0.46x | $14.09 Million | $30.44 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | $17.62 Million | $27.10 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2008 | 1.10x | $31.00 Million | $28.13 Million | ▲ +631.3% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | $3.59 Million | $23.80 Million | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2006 | 1.10x | $11.19 Million | $10.17 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2005 | 2.27x | $17.03 Million | $7.52 Million | ▲ +405.6% |
| 2004 | 0.45x | $4.45 Million | $9.93 Million | ▲ +359.7% |
| 2003 | -0.17x | $-1.84 Million | $10.68 Million | ▼ -122.8% |
| 2002 | 0.76x | $12.27 Million | $16.19 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2001 | 0.72x | $13.32 Million | $18.57 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2000 | 1.13x | $8.42 Million | $7.43 Million | ▼ -73.9% |
| 1999 | 4.33x | $10.40 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +1884.2% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $3.80 Million | $17.40 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 1997 | 0.46x | $4.20 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 1996 | 0.76x | $3.20 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +204.8% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $500.00K | $2.00 Million | — |