Mind Technology Inc (MIND) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mind Technology Inc (MIND) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of October 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $894.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.40 Million) in one year. See MIND free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mind Technology Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mind Technology Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Mind Technology Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mind Technology Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mind Technology Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Mind Technology Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $651.00K | $9.39 Million | ▲ +115.1% |
| 2024 | -0.46x | $-4.97 Million | $10.85 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-2.90 Million | $9.81 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2022 | -1.46x | $-17.13 Million | $11.76 Million | ▼ -114.2% |
| 2021 | -0.68x | $-6.36 Million | $9.35 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2020 | -0.55x | $-5.82 Million | $10.58 Million | ▲ +13.1% |
| 2019 | -0.63x | $-5.46 Million | $8.62 Million | ▼ -789.2% |
| 2018 | 0.09x | $719.00K | $7.83 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2017 | 0.23x | $3.15 Million | $13.78 Million | ▼ -54.4% |
| 2016 | 0.50x | $14.92 Million | $29.72 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2015 | 0.76x | $25.20 Million | $33.14 Million | ▲ +25.4% |
| 2014 | 0.61x | $21.21 Million | $34.97 Million | ▼ -80.7% |
| 2013 | 3.14x | $44.26 Million | $14.09 Million | ▲ +273.7% |
| 2012 | 0.84x | $35.96 Million | $42.80 Million | ▲ +20.6% |
| 2011 | 0.70x | $30.14 Million | $43.26 Million | ▲ +50.6% |
| 2010 | 0.46x | $14.09 Million | $30.44 Million | ▼ -28.8% |
| 2009 | 0.65x | $17.62 Million | $27.10 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 2008 | 1.10x | $31.00 Million | $28.13 Million | ▲ +631.3% |
| 2007 | 0.15x | $3.59 Million | $23.80 Million | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2006 | 1.10x | $11.19 Million | $10.17 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2005 | 2.27x | $17.03 Million | $7.52 Million | ▲ +405.6% |
| 2004 | 0.45x | $4.45 Million | $9.93 Million | ▲ +359.7% |
| 2003 | -0.17x | $-1.84 Million | $10.68 Million | ▼ -122.8% |
| 2002 | 0.76x | $12.27 Million | $16.19 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2001 | 0.72x | $13.32 Million | $18.57 Million | ▼ -36.7% |
| 2000 | 1.13x | $8.42 Million | $7.43 Million | ▼ -73.9% |
| 1999 | 4.33x | $10.40 Million | $2.40 Million | ▲ +1884.2% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $3.80 Million | $17.40 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 1997 | 0.46x | $4.20 Million | $9.10 Million | ▼ -39.4% |
| 1996 | 0.76x | $3.20 Million | $4.20 Million | ▲ +204.8% |
| 1995 | 0.25x | $500.00K | $2.00 Million | — |