Mitek Systems Inc (MITK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mitek Systems Inc (MITK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-945.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.47 Million) in one year. Explore Mitek Systems Inc long-term investment allocation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mitek Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mitek Systems Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore Mitek Systems Inc total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mitek Systems Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mitek Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Mitek Systems Inc (MITK) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $55.34 Million | $218.85 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $31.69 Million | $198.95 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $31.59 Million | $200.19 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $26.35 Million | $190.09 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $37.34 Million | $226.86 Million | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2020 | 0.65x | $24.12 Million | $36.91 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2019 | 0.50x | $14.25 Million | $28.56 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $5.63 Million | $31.76 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 2017 | 1.01x | $10.45 Million | $10.31 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2016 | 0.88x | $7.85 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2015 | 0.73x | $6.11 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +313.0% |
| 2014 | -0.34x | $-2.47 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -299.4% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-615.06K | $7.12 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2012 | -0.56x | $-1.78 Million | $3.17 Million | ▼ -419.2% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $316.17K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +143.8% |
| 2010 | -0.40x | $-806.06K | $2.01 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2009 | -0.38x | $-553.45K | $1.48 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2008 | -0.28x | $-398.94K | $1.45 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2007 | -0.21x | $-205.72K | $986.67K | ▼ -572.9% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-53.53K | $1.73 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2005 | -0.81x | $-2.02 Million | $2.51 Million | ▼ -302.6% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $1.22 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | $1.22 Million | $3.07 Million | ▲ +240.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $374.72K | $3.20 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $969.30K | $2.05 Million | ▲ +175.0% |
| 2000 | -0.63x | $-1.82 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -278.1% |
| 1999 | -0.17x | $-300.00K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1997 | -1.93x | $-2.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -524.3% |
| 1996 | 0.45x | $500.00K | $1.10 Million | ▲ +342.4% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-300.00K | $1.60 Million | ▼ -135.9% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $1.20 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 1993 | 0.73x | $2.40 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 1992 | 0.94x | $3.40 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 1991 | 0.29x | $2.80 Million | $9.50 Million | ▲ +167.5% |
| 1990 | 0.11x | $1.30 Million | $11.80 Million | — |