Mitek Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mitek Systems Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mitek Systems Inc (MITK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.23x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $27.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.53 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of Mitek Systems Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mitek Systems Inc (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mitek Systems Inc from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mitek Systems Inc across 36 annual periods. Check Mitek Systems Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Mitek Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Mitek Systems Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mitek Systems Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Mitek Systems Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $55.34 Million | $218.85 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $31.69 Million | $198.95 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $31.59 Million | $200.19 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $26.35 Million | $190.09 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $37.34 Million | $226.86 Million | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2020 | 0.65x | $24.12 Million | $36.91 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2019 | 0.50x | $14.25 Million | $28.56 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $5.63 Million | $31.76 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 2017 | 1.01x | $10.45 Million | $10.31 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2016 | 0.88x | $7.85 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2015 | 0.73x | $6.11 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +313.0% |
| 2014 | -0.34x | $-2.47 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -299.4% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-615.06K | $7.12 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2012 | -0.56x | $-1.78 Million | $3.17 Million | ▼ -419.2% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $316.17K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +143.8% |
| 2010 | -0.40x | $-806.06K | $2.01 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2009 | -0.38x | $-553.45K | $1.48 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2008 | -0.28x | $-398.94K | $1.45 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2007 | -0.21x | $-205.72K | $986.67K | ▼ -572.9% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-53.53K | $1.73 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2005 | -0.81x | $-2.02 Million | $2.51 Million | ▼ -302.6% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $1.22 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | $1.22 Million | $3.07 Million | ▲ +240.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $374.72K | $3.20 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $969.30K | $2.05 Million | ▲ +175.0% |
| 2000 | -0.63x | $-1.82 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -278.1% |
| 1999 | -0.17x | $-300.00K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1997 | -1.93x | $-2.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -524.3% |
| 1996 | 0.45x | $500.00K | $1.10 Million | ▲ +342.4% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-300.00K | $1.60 Million | ▼ -135.9% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $1.20 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 1993 | 0.73x | $2.40 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 1992 | 0.94x | $3.40 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 1991 | 0.29x | $2.80 Million | $9.50 Million | ▲ +167.5% |
| 1990 | 0.11x | $1.30 Million | $11.80 Million | — |