Mitek Systems Inc (MITK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mitek Systems Inc (MITK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-945.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($117.47 Million) in one year. See Mitek Systems Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Mitek Systems Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Mitek Systems Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Mitek Systems Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Mitek Systems Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mitek Systems Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Mitek Systems Inc (MITK) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.25x | $55.34 Million | $218.85 Million | ▲ +58.8% |
| 2024 | 0.16x | $31.69 Million | $198.95 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $31.59 Million | $200.19 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $26.35 Million | $190.09 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 2021 | 0.16x | $37.34 Million | $226.86 Million | ▼ -74.8% |
| 2020 | 0.65x | $24.12 Million | $36.91 Million | ▲ +31.0% |
| 2019 | 0.50x | $14.25 Million | $28.56 Million | ▲ +181.6% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $5.63 Million | $31.76 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 2017 | 1.01x | $10.45 Million | $10.31 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2016 | 0.88x | $7.85 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2015 | 0.73x | $6.11 Million | $8.31 Million | ▲ +313.0% |
| 2014 | -0.34x | $-2.47 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -299.4% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-615.06K | $7.12 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2012 | -0.56x | $-1.78 Million | $3.17 Million | ▼ -419.2% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $316.17K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +143.8% |
| 2010 | -0.40x | $-806.06K | $2.01 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2009 | -0.38x | $-553.45K | $1.48 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2008 | -0.28x | $-398.94K | $1.45 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2007 | -0.21x | $-205.72K | $986.67K | ▼ -572.9% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-53.53K | $1.73 Million | ▲ +96.2% |
| 2005 | -0.81x | $-2.02 Million | $2.51 Million | ▼ -302.6% |
| 2004 | 0.40x | $1.22 Million | $3.07 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2003 | 0.40x | $1.22 Million | $3.07 Million | ▲ +240.4% |
| 2002 | 0.12x | $374.72K | $3.20 Million | ▼ -75.2% |
| 2001 | 0.47x | $969.30K | $2.05 Million | ▲ +175.0% |
| 2000 | -0.63x | $-1.82 Million | $2.88 Million | ▼ -278.1% |
| 1999 | -0.17x | $-300.00K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 1998 | -0.11x | $-200.00K | $1.80 Million | ▲ +94.2% |
| 1997 | -1.93x | $-2.70 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -524.3% |
| 1996 | 0.45x | $500.00K | $1.10 Million | ▲ +342.4% |
| 1995 | -0.19x | $-300.00K | $1.60 Million | ▼ -135.9% |
| 1994 | 0.52x | $1.20 Million | $2.30 Million | ▼ -28.3% |
| 1993 | 0.73x | $2.40 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -23.0% |
| 1992 | 0.94x | $3.40 Million | $3.60 Million | ▲ +220.4% |
| 1991 | 0.29x | $2.80 Million | $9.50 Million | ▲ +167.5% |
| 1990 | 0.11x | $1.30 Million | $11.80 Million | — |