MKS Instruments Inc (MKSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MKS Instruments Inc (MKSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $53.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.92 Billion) in one year. See MKSI cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
MKS Instruments Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for MKS Instruments Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of MKS Instruments Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MKS Instruments Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MKS Instruments Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MKSI market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $645.00 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $528.00 Million | $6.27 Billion | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $319.00 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $529.00 Million | $7.01 Billion | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $639.50 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2020 | 0.33x | $513.20 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +89.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $244.50 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -68.6% |
| 2018 | 0.56x | $413.78 Million | $741.06 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | $355.22 Million | $825.11 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $180.10 Million | $970.45 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2015 | 1.23x | $138.29 Million | $112.47 Million | ▲ +71.6% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $101.91 Million | $142.22 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $76.09 Million | $191.50 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2012 | 0.98x | $137.17 Million | $140.41 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2011 | 1.21x | $156.04 Million | $128.64 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2010 | 1.21x | $163.47 Million | $135.37 Million | ▲ +1360.9% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $7.37 Million | $89.14 Million | ▼ -91.0% |
| 2008 | 0.91x | $89.78 Million | $98.24 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2007 | 0.97x | $119.12 Million | $122.25 Million | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2006 | 0.55x | $78.21 Million | $142.50 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2005 | 0.64x | $64.16 Million | $100.90 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2004 | 0.65x | $66.40 Million | $102.04 Million | ▲ +29839.3% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $-185.00K | $84.55 Million | ▼ -101.2% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $13.85 Million | $74.93 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $20.11 Million | $58.32 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $34.03 Million | $67.45 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 1999 | 0.31x | $17.10 Million | $55.40 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $23.00 Million | $77.30 Million | — |