MKS Instruments Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MKS Instruments Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. MKS Instruments Inc (MKSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $53.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.92 Billion) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of MKS Instruments Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of MKS Instruments Inc (1998–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of MKS Instruments Inc from 1998 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for MKS Instruments Inc across 28 annual periods. Check MKS Instruments Inc (MKSI) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
MKS Instruments Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2025)
MKS Instruments Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MKS Instruments Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MKSI cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $645.00 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $528.00 Million | $6.27 Billion | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $319.00 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $529.00 Million | $7.01 Billion | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $639.50 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2020 | 0.33x | $513.20 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +89.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $244.50 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -68.6% |
| 2018 | 0.56x | $413.78 Million | $741.06 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | $355.22 Million | $825.11 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $180.10 Million | $970.45 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2015 | 1.23x | $138.29 Million | $112.47 Million | ▲ +71.6% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $101.91 Million | $142.22 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $76.09 Million | $191.50 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2012 | 0.98x | $137.17 Million | $140.41 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2011 | 1.21x | $156.04 Million | $128.64 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2010 | 1.21x | $163.47 Million | $135.37 Million | ▲ +1360.9% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $7.37 Million | $89.14 Million | ▼ -91.0% |
| 2008 | 0.91x | $89.78 Million | $98.24 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2007 | 0.97x | $119.12 Million | $122.25 Million | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2006 | 0.55x | $78.21 Million | $142.50 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2005 | 0.64x | $64.16 Million | $100.90 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2004 | 0.65x | $66.40 Million | $102.04 Million | ▲ +29839.3% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $-185.00K | $84.55 Million | ▼ -101.2% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $13.85 Million | $74.93 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $20.11 Million | $58.32 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $34.03 Million | $67.45 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 1999 | 0.31x | $17.10 Million | $55.40 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $23.00 Million | $77.30 Million | — |