MKS Instruments Inc (MKSI) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
MKS Instruments Inc (MKSI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $53.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($5.92 Billion) in one year. Explore how much of MKS Instruments Inc's assets are long-term investments to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
MKS Instruments Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for MKS Instruments Inc across 28 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of MKS Instruments Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for MKS Instruments Inc (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for MKS Instruments Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see MKS Instruments Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.11x | $645.00 Million | $6.08 Billion | ▲ +26.0% |
| 2024 | 0.08x | $528.00 Million | $6.27 Billion | ▲ +75.5% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $319.00 Million | $6.65 Billion | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2022 | 0.08x | $529.00 Million | $7.01 Billion | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2021 | 0.39x | $639.50 Million | $1.65 Billion | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2020 | 0.33x | $513.20 Million | $1.54 Billion | ▲ +89.5% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $244.50 Million | $1.39 Billion | ▼ -68.6% |
| 2018 | 0.56x | $413.78 Million | $741.06 Million | ▲ +29.7% |
| 2017 | 0.43x | $355.22 Million | $825.11 Million | ▲ +132.0% |
| 2016 | 0.19x | $180.10 Million | $970.45 Million | ▼ -84.9% |
| 2015 | 1.23x | $138.29 Million | $112.47 Million | ▲ +71.6% |
| 2014 | 0.72x | $101.91 Million | $142.22 Million | ▲ +80.3% |
| 2013 | 0.40x | $76.09 Million | $191.50 Million | ▼ -59.3% |
| 2012 | 0.98x | $137.17 Million | $140.41 Million | ▼ -19.5% |
| 2011 | 1.21x | $156.04 Million | $128.64 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2010 | 1.21x | $163.47 Million | $135.37 Million | ▲ +1360.9% |
| 2009 | 0.08x | $7.37 Million | $89.14 Million | ▼ -91.0% |
| 2008 | 0.91x | $89.78 Million | $98.24 Million | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2007 | 0.97x | $119.12 Million | $122.25 Million | ▲ +77.5% |
| 2006 | 0.55x | $78.21 Million | $142.50 Million | ▼ -13.7% |
| 2005 | 0.64x | $64.16 Million | $100.90 Million | ▼ -2.3% |
| 2004 | 0.65x | $66.40 Million | $102.04 Million | ▲ +29839.3% |
| 2003 | 0.00x | $-185.00K | $84.55 Million | ▼ -101.2% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $13.85 Million | $74.93 Million | ▼ -46.4% |
| 2001 | 0.34x | $20.11 Million | $58.32 Million | ▼ -31.7% |
| 2000 | 0.50x | $34.03 Million | $67.45 Million | ▲ +63.5% |
| 1999 | 0.31x | $17.10 Million | $55.40 Million | ▲ +3.7% |
| 1998 | 0.30x | $23.00 Million | $77.30 Million | — |