Mesa Laboratories Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Mesa Laboratories Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Mesa Laboratories Inc (MLAB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.08x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $18.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($248.16 Million) in one year. Check Mesa Laboratories Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Mesa Laboratories Inc (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Mesa Laboratories Inc from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Mesa Laboratories Inc across 36 annual periods. Check Mesa Laboratories Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Mesa Laboratories Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Mesa Laboratories Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Mesa Laboratories Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash efficiency ratio of Mesa Laboratories Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.17x | $46.81 Million | $273.52 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $44.13 Million | $301.40 Million | ▲ +40.4% |
| 2023 | 0.10x | $27.98 Million | $268.35 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2022 | 0.13x | $39.22 Million | $313.57 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $37.07 Million | $195.25 Million | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $26.56 Million | $200.19 Million | ▼ -80.3% |
| 2019 | 0.67x | $30.55 Million | $45.46 Million | ▲ +75.4% |
| 2018 | 0.38x | $24.81 Million | $64.74 Million | ▲ +265.5% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $7.75 Million | $73.91 Million | ▼ -52.8% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $16.90 Million | $76.07 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | $10.82 Million | $43.84 Million | ▼ -33.8% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $12.37 Million | $33.20 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2013 | 0.87x | $11.40 Million | $13.17 Million | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2012 | 1.84x | $12.49 Million | $6.78 Million | ▲ +202.4% |
| 2011 | 0.61x | $8.87 Million | $14.57 Million | ▼ -75.1% |
| 2010 | 2.45x | $5.98 Million | $2.44 Million | ▼ -2.9% |
| 2009 | 2.52x | $5.08 Million | $2.01 Million | ▼ -2.0% |
| 2008 | 2.57x | $4.62 Million | $1.79 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 2007 | 2.47x | $4.03 Million | $1.63 Million | ▲ +64.1% |
| 2006 | 1.51x | $2.31 Million | $1.53 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2005 | 2.06x | $2.50 Million | $1.22 Million | ▼ -46.9% |
| 2004 | 3.87x | $3.27 Million | $846.00K | ▼ -10.2% |
| 2003 | 4.31x | $2.90 Million | $673.06K | ▲ +3.5% |
| 2002 | 4.16x | $2.26 Million | $542.45K | ▲ +252.4% |
| 2001 | 1.18x | $1.05 Million | $886.01K | ▼ -52.6% |
| 2000 | 2.49x | $2.33 Million | $934.80K | ▼ -35.4% |
| 1999 | 3.86x | $2.70 Million | $700.00K | ▲ +5.2% |
| 1998 | 3.67x | $2.20 Million | $600.00K | ▼ -8.3% |
| 1997 | 4.00x | $2.40 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +88.2% |
| 1996 | 2.13x | $1.70 Million | $800.00K | ▲ +41.7% |
| 1995 | 1.50x | $900.00K | $600.00K | ▲ +50.0% |
| 1994 | 1.00x | $700.00K | $700.00K | ▲ +100.0% |
| 1993 | 0.50x | $500.00K | $1.00 Million | ▼ -70.0% |
| 1992 | 1.67x | $1.00 Million | $600.00K | ▲ +11.1% |
| 1991 | 1.50x | $900.00K | $600.00K | ▲ +300.0% |
| 1990 | 0.38x | $300.00K | $800.00K | — |