Matrix Service Co (MTRX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Matrix Service Co (MTRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $34.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($477.13 Million) in one year. Check Matrix Service Co cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Matrix Service Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Matrix Service Co across 35 annual periods. Also explore balance sheet size of Matrix Service Co for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Matrix Service Co (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Matrix Service Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Matrix Service Co stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $117.47 Million | $457.54 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $72.57 Million | $287.17 Million | ▲ +440.1% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $10.25 Million | $219.02 Million | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2022 | -0.25x | $-54.20 Million | $213.09 Million | ▼ -1458.2% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-2.97 Million | $182.02 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $44.09 Million | $209.42 Million | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $41.39 Million | $281.44 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $74.67 Million | $239.19 Million | ▲ +540.0% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-18.75 Million | $264.22 Million | ▼ -158.3% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $30.33 Million | $249.40 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $24.44 Million | $281.11 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $76.99 Million | $286.65 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $57.08 Million | $171.82 Million | ▲ +1165.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $2.94 Million | $112.04 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $22.75 Million | $106.77 Million | ▲ +419.4% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $4.40 Million | $107.22 Million | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $38.62 Million | $133.06 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $45.60 Million | $135.89 Million | ▲ +246.6% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $11.36 Million | $117.33 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | $35.88 Million | $111.88 Million | ▲ +996.5% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $4.52 Million | $154.40 Million | ▲ +114.1% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | $-28.10 Million | $135.83 Million | ▼ -256.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $17.54 Million | $132.76 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $8.73 Million | $40.99 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $5.99 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2000 | 0.36x | $8.41 Million | $23.40 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 1999 | 0.43x | $16.70 Million | $38.50 Million | ▲ +585.4% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $3.00 Million | $47.40 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $6.20 Million | $40.70 Million | ▼ -48.0% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $9.60 Million | $32.80 Million | ▲ +1602.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $600.00K | $34.90 Million | ▼ -94.7% |
| 1994 | 0.32x | $10.10 Million | $31.40 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 1993 | 0.64x | $10.80 Million | $17.00 Million | ▲ +2774.7% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $400.00K | $18.10 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 1991 | 0.31x | $3.70 Million | $12.10 Million | — |