Matrix Service Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Matrix Service Co cash flow-to-debt ratio. Matrix Service Co (MTRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-8.81 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($460.75 Million) in one year. Check Matrix Service Co cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Matrix Service Co (1991–2026)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Matrix Service Co from 1991 to 2026. Historical debt coverage capacity for Matrix Service Co across 36 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Matrix Service Co to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Matrix Service Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1991–2026)
Matrix Service Co cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1991 to 2026. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Matrix Service Co. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see MTRX cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.01x | $6.91 Million | $460.75 Million | ▼ -94.2% |
| 2025 | 0.26x | $117.47 Million | $457.54 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $72.57 Million | $287.17 Million | ▲ +440.1% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $10.25 Million | $219.02 Million | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2022 | -0.25x | $-54.20 Million | $213.09 Million | ▼ -1458.2% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-2.97 Million | $182.02 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $44.09 Million | $209.42 Million | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $41.39 Million | $281.44 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $74.67 Million | $239.19 Million | ▲ +540.0% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-18.75 Million | $264.22 Million | ▼ -158.3% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $30.33 Million | $249.40 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $24.44 Million | $281.11 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $76.99 Million | $286.65 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $57.08 Million | $171.82 Million | ▲ +1165.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $2.94 Million | $112.04 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $22.75 Million | $106.77 Million | ▲ +419.4% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $4.40 Million | $107.22 Million | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $38.62 Million | $133.06 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $45.60 Million | $135.89 Million | ▲ +246.6% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $11.36 Million | $117.33 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | $35.88 Million | $111.88 Million | ▲ +996.5% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $4.52 Million | $154.40 Million | ▲ +114.1% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | $-28.10 Million | $135.83 Million | ▼ -256.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $17.54 Million | $132.76 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $8.73 Million | $40.99 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $5.99 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2000 | 0.36x | $8.41 Million | $23.40 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 1999 | 0.43x | $16.70 Million | $38.50 Million | ▲ +585.4% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $3.00 Million | $47.40 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $6.20 Million | $40.70 Million | ▼ -48.0% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $9.60 Million | $32.80 Million | ▲ +1602.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $600.00K | $34.90 Million | ▼ -94.7% |
| 1994 | 0.32x | $10.10 Million | $31.40 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 1993 | 0.64x | $10.80 Million | $17.00 Million | ▲ +2774.7% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $400.00K | $18.10 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 1991 | 0.31x | $3.70 Million | $12.10 Million | — |