Matrix Service Co (MTRX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Matrix Service Co (MTRX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $34.16 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($477.13 Million) in one year. See Matrix Service Co free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Matrix Service Co Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Matrix Service Co across 35 annual periods. Also explore MTRX net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Matrix Service Co (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Matrix Service Co. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Matrix Service Co.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $117.47 Million | $457.54 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $72.57 Million | $287.17 Million | ▲ +440.1% |
| 2023 | 0.05x | $10.25 Million | $219.02 Million | ▲ +118.4% |
| 2022 | -0.25x | $-54.20 Million | $213.09 Million | ▼ -1458.2% |
| 2021 | -0.02x | $-2.97 Million | $182.02 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2020 | 0.21x | $44.09 Million | $209.42 Million | ▲ +43.1% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $41.39 Million | $281.44 Million | ▼ -52.9% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $74.67 Million | $239.19 Million | ▲ +540.0% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-18.75 Million | $264.22 Million | ▼ -158.3% |
| 2016 | 0.12x | $30.33 Million | $249.40 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2015 | 0.09x | $24.44 Million | $281.11 Million | ▼ -67.6% |
| 2014 | 0.27x | $76.99 Million | $286.65 Million | ▼ -19.2% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $57.08 Million | $171.82 Million | ▲ +1165.7% |
| 2012 | 0.03x | $2.94 Million | $112.04 Million | ▼ -87.7% |
| 2011 | 0.21x | $22.75 Million | $106.77 Million | ▲ +419.4% |
| 2010 | 0.04x | $4.40 Million | $107.22 Million | ▼ -85.9% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $38.62 Million | $133.06 Million | ▼ -13.5% |
| 2008 | 0.34x | $45.60 Million | $135.89 Million | ▲ +246.6% |
| 2007 | 0.10x | $11.36 Million | $117.33 Million | ▼ -69.8% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | $35.88 Million | $111.88 Million | ▲ +996.5% |
| 2005 | 0.03x | $4.52 Million | $154.40 Million | ▲ +114.1% |
| 2004 | -0.21x | $-28.10 Million | $135.83 Million | ▼ -256.6% |
| 2003 | 0.13x | $17.54 Million | $132.76 Million | ▼ -37.9% |
| 2002 | 0.21x | $8.73 Million | $40.99 Million | ▲ +8.1% |
| 2001 | 0.20x | $5.99 Million | $30.41 Million | ▼ -45.2% |
| 2000 | 0.36x | $8.41 Million | $23.40 Million | ▼ -17.1% |
| 1999 | 0.43x | $16.70 Million | $38.50 Million | ▲ +585.4% |
| 1998 | 0.06x | $3.00 Million | $47.40 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $6.20 Million | $40.70 Million | ▼ -48.0% |
| 1996 | 0.29x | $9.60 Million | $32.80 Million | ▲ +1602.4% |
| 1995 | 0.02x | $600.00K | $34.90 Million | ▼ -94.7% |
| 1994 | 0.32x | $10.10 Million | $31.40 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 1993 | 0.64x | $10.80 Million | $17.00 Million | ▲ +2774.7% |
| 1992 | 0.02x | $400.00K | $18.10 Million | ▼ -92.8% |
| 1991 | 0.31x | $3.70 Million | $12.10 Million | — |