Neonode Inc (NEON) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Neonode Inc (NEON) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.25x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.02 Million) in one year. Explore Neonode Inc (NEON) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Neonode Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Neonode Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Neonode Inc for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Neonode Inc (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Neonode Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Neonode Inc (NEON) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.88x | $-5.59 Million | $1.94 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2023 | -3.41x | $-6.31 Million | $1.85 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2022 | -3.82x | $-6.81 Million | $1.78 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2021 | -2.43x | $-7.68 Million | $3.15 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2020 | -1.23x | $-5.75 Million | $4.68 Million | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2019 | -0.98x | $-3.52 Million | $3.59 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2018 | -0.83x | $-2.86 Million | $3.45 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2017 | -1.06x | $-5.58 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2016 | -1.12x | $-6.25 Million | $5.57 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2015 | -1.97x | $-8.06 Million | $4.09 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2014 | -2.22x | $-11.82 Million | $5.33 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2013 | -1.72x | $-8.80 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -86.7% |
| 2012 | -0.92x | $-3.74 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2011 | -1.17x | $-3.45 Million | $2.95 Million | ▼ -306.7% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | $-3.19 Million | $11.12 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2009 | -0.38x | $-1.82 Million | $4.83 Million | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2008 | -12.42x | $-15.30 Million | $1.23 Million | ▼ -2204.5% |
| 2007 | -0.54x | $-10.68 Million | $19.81 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2006 | -1.49x | $-2.31 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2005 | -1.63x | $-2.42 Million | $1.48 Million | ▼ -2077.3% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-140.00K | $1.87 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-84.00K | $1.59 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2002 | -2.22x | $-2.70 Million | $1.22 Million | ▼ -856.5% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | $-1.52 Million | $6.57 Million | ▼ -136.3% |
| 2000 | 0.64x | $2.29 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1999 | 0.65x | $1.30 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +246.3% |
| 1998 | -0.44x | $-1.20 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -131.9% |
| 1997 | 1.39x | $4.60 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +253.8% |
| 1996 | -0.91x | $-2.90 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 1995 | -1.52x | $-4.40 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -207.5% |
| 1994 | 1.41x | $2.40 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1993 | 2.12x | $3.60 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1992 | 1.91x | $4.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +588.7% |
| 1991 | 0.28x | $500.00K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 1990 | 2.13x | $3.40 Million | $1.60 Million | — |