Neonode Inc (NEON) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Neonode Inc (NEON) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.25x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.02 Million) in one year. See Neonode Inc (NEON) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Neonode Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Neonode Inc across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Neonode Inc (NEON) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Neonode Inc (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Neonode Inc. Check Neonode Inc (NEON) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.88x | $-5.59 Million | $1.94 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2023 | -3.41x | $-6.31 Million | $1.85 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2022 | -3.82x | $-6.81 Million | $1.78 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2021 | -2.43x | $-7.68 Million | $3.15 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2020 | -1.23x | $-5.75 Million | $4.68 Million | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2019 | -0.98x | $-3.52 Million | $3.59 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2018 | -0.83x | $-2.86 Million | $3.45 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2017 | -1.06x | $-5.58 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2016 | -1.12x | $-6.25 Million | $5.57 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2015 | -1.97x | $-8.06 Million | $4.09 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2014 | -2.22x | $-11.82 Million | $5.33 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2013 | -1.72x | $-8.80 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -86.7% |
| 2012 | -0.92x | $-3.74 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2011 | -1.17x | $-3.45 Million | $2.95 Million | ▼ -306.7% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | $-3.19 Million | $11.12 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2009 | -0.38x | $-1.82 Million | $4.83 Million | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2008 | -12.42x | $-15.30 Million | $1.23 Million | ▼ -2204.5% |
| 2007 | -0.54x | $-10.68 Million | $19.81 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2006 | -1.49x | $-2.31 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2005 | -1.63x | $-2.42 Million | $1.48 Million | ▼ -2077.3% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-140.00K | $1.87 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-84.00K | $1.59 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2002 | -2.22x | $-2.70 Million | $1.22 Million | ▼ -856.5% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | $-1.52 Million | $6.57 Million | ▼ -136.3% |
| 2000 | 0.64x | $2.29 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1999 | 0.65x | $1.30 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +246.3% |
| 1998 | -0.44x | $-1.20 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -131.9% |
| 1997 | 1.39x | $4.60 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +253.8% |
| 1996 | -0.91x | $-2.90 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 1995 | -1.52x | $-4.40 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -207.5% |
| 1994 | 1.41x | $2.40 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1993 | 2.12x | $3.60 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1992 | 1.91x | $4.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +588.7% |
| 1991 | 0.28x | $500.00K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 1990 | 2.13x | $3.40 Million | $1.60 Million | — |