Neonode Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Neonode Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Neonode Inc (NEON) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.25x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.02 Million) in one year. Check Neonode Inc (NEON) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Neonode Inc (1990–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Neonode Inc from 1990 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Neonode Inc across 35 annual periods. Check NEON cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Neonode Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2024)
Neonode Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Neonode Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see NEON cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.88x | $-5.59 Million | $1.94 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2023 | -3.41x | $-6.31 Million | $1.85 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2022 | -3.82x | $-6.81 Million | $1.78 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2021 | -2.43x | $-7.68 Million | $3.15 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2020 | -1.23x | $-5.75 Million | $4.68 Million | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2019 | -0.98x | $-3.52 Million | $3.59 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2018 | -0.83x | $-2.86 Million | $3.45 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2017 | -1.06x | $-5.58 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2016 | -1.12x | $-6.25 Million | $5.57 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2015 | -1.97x | $-8.06 Million | $4.09 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2014 | -2.22x | $-11.82 Million | $5.33 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2013 | -1.72x | $-8.80 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -86.7% |
| 2012 | -0.92x | $-3.74 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2011 | -1.17x | $-3.45 Million | $2.95 Million | ▼ -306.7% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | $-3.19 Million | $11.12 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2009 | -0.38x | $-1.82 Million | $4.83 Million | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2008 | -12.42x | $-15.30 Million | $1.23 Million | ▼ -2204.5% |
| 2007 | -0.54x | $-10.68 Million | $19.81 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2006 | -1.49x | $-2.31 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2005 | -1.63x | $-2.42 Million | $1.48 Million | ▼ -2077.3% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-140.00K | $1.87 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-84.00K | $1.59 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2002 | -2.22x | $-2.70 Million | $1.22 Million | ▼ -856.5% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | $-1.52 Million | $6.57 Million | ▼ -136.3% |
| 2000 | 0.64x | $2.29 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1999 | 0.65x | $1.30 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +246.3% |
| 1998 | -0.44x | $-1.20 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -131.9% |
| 1997 | 1.39x | $4.60 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +253.8% |
| 1996 | -0.91x | $-2.90 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 1995 | -1.52x | $-4.40 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -207.5% |
| 1994 | 1.41x | $2.40 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1993 | 2.12x | $3.60 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1992 | 1.91x | $4.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +588.7% |
| 1991 | 0.28x | $500.00K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 1990 | 2.13x | $3.40 Million | $1.60 Million | — |