Neonode Inc (NEON) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Neonode Inc (NEON) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.25x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.02 Million) in one year. See NEON free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Neonode Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Neonode Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of Neonode Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Neonode Inc (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Neonode Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Neonode Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -2.88x | $-5.59 Million | $1.94 Million | ▲ +15.4% |
| 2023 | -3.41x | $-6.31 Million | $1.85 Million | ▲ +10.9% |
| 2022 | -3.82x | $-6.81 Million | $1.78 Million | ▼ -57.2% |
| 2021 | -2.43x | $-7.68 Million | $3.15 Million | ▼ -98.1% |
| 2020 | -1.23x | $-5.75 Million | $4.68 Million | ▼ -25.4% |
| 2019 | -0.98x | $-3.52 Million | $3.59 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2018 | -0.83x | $-2.86 Million | $3.45 Million | ▲ +21.7% |
| 2017 | -1.06x | $-5.58 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +5.6% |
| 2016 | -1.12x | $-6.25 Million | $5.57 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2015 | -1.97x | $-8.06 Million | $4.09 Million | ▲ +11.2% |
| 2014 | -2.22x | $-11.82 Million | $5.33 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2013 | -1.72x | $-8.80 Million | $5.12 Million | ▼ -86.7% |
| 2012 | -0.92x | $-3.74 Million | $4.07 Million | ▲ +21.3% |
| 2011 | -1.17x | $-3.45 Million | $2.95 Million | ▼ -306.7% |
| 2010 | -0.29x | $-3.19 Million | $11.12 Million | ▲ +23.6% |
| 2009 | -0.38x | $-1.82 Million | $4.83 Million | ▲ +97.0% |
| 2008 | -12.42x | $-15.30 Million | $1.23 Million | ▼ -2204.5% |
| 2007 | -0.54x | $-10.68 Million | $19.81 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2006 | -1.49x | $-2.31 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +8.6% |
| 2005 | -1.63x | $-2.42 Million | $1.48 Million | ▼ -2077.3% |
| 2004 | -0.07x | $-140.00K | $1.87 Million | ▼ -41.5% |
| 2003 | -0.05x | $-84.00K | $1.59 Million | ▲ +97.6% |
| 2002 | -2.22x | $-2.70 Million | $1.22 Million | ▼ -856.5% |
| 2001 | -0.23x | $-1.52 Million | $6.57 Million | ▼ -136.3% |
| 2000 | 0.64x | $2.29 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -1.9% |
| 1999 | 0.65x | $1.30 Million | $2.00 Million | ▲ +246.3% |
| 1998 | -0.44x | $-1.20 Million | $2.70 Million | ▼ -131.9% |
| 1997 | 1.39x | $4.60 Million | $3.30 Million | ▲ +253.8% |
| 1996 | -0.91x | $-2.90 Million | $3.20 Million | ▲ +40.3% |
| 1995 | -1.52x | $-4.40 Million | $2.90 Million | ▼ -207.5% |
| 1994 | 1.41x | $2.40 Million | $1.70 Million | ▼ -33.3% |
| 1993 | 2.12x | $3.60 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1992 | 1.91x | $4.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +588.7% |
| 1991 | 0.28x | $500.00K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 1990 | 2.13x | $3.40 Million | $1.60 Million | — |