National Research Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
National Research Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio. National Research Corp (NRC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.01x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($129.60 Million) in one year. Check how high is National Research Corp's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of National Research Corp (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of National Research Corp from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for National Research Corp across 30 annual periods. Check National Research Corp investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
National Research Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
National Research Corp cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for National Research Corp. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does National Research Corp generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $26.45 Million | $120.89 Million | ▼ -36.0% |
| 2024 | 0.34x | $34.62 Million | $101.25 Million | ▼ -34.1% |
| 2023 | 0.52x | $38.11 Million | $73.48 Million | ▼ -16.4% |
| 2022 | 0.62x | $36.27 Million | $58.43 Million | ▼ -3.3% |
| 2021 | 0.64x | $46.34 Million | $72.20 Million | ▲ +9.2% |
| 2020 | 0.59x | $40.64 Million | $69.11 Million | ▲ +11.8% |
| 2019 | 0.53x | $40.92 Million | $77.79 Million | ▲ +16.9% |
| 2018 | 0.45x | $39.85 Million | $88.60 Million | ▼ -40.3% |
| 2017 | 0.75x | $28.09 Million | $37.27 Million | ▲ +6.2% |
| 2016 | 0.71x | $26.84 Million | $37.82 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $21.89 Million | $54.88 Million | ▼ -36.4% |
| 2014 | 0.63x | $26.20 Million | $41.76 Million | ▲ +27.4% |
| 2013 | 0.49x | $19.32 Million | $39.24 Million | ▲ +11.4% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $19.13 Million | $43.30 Million | ▲ +7.9% |
| 2011 | 0.41x | $18.48 Million | $45.12 Million | ▲ +31.9% |
| 2010 | 0.31x | $14.60 Million | $47.03 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2009 | 0.48x | $13.67 Million | $28.33 Million | ▲ +1.9% |
| 2008 | 0.47x | $15.18 Million | $32.05 Million | ▼ -36.3% |
| 2007 | 0.74x | $14.57 Million | $19.58 Million | ▲ +170.6% |
| 2006 | 0.27x | $6.81 Million | $24.78 Million | ▼ -59.4% |
| 2005 | 0.68x | $8.19 Million | $12.08 Million | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2004 | 0.60x | $7.82 Million | $12.94 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2003 | 0.62x | $8.27 Million | $13.25 Million | ▲ +57.5% |
| 2002 | 0.40x | $4.28 Million | $10.81 Million | ▲ +34.0% |
| 2001 | 0.30x | $3.08 Million | $10.42 Million | ▲ +49.8% |
| 2000 | 0.20x | $2.02 Million | $10.26 Million | ▼ -39.7% |
| 1999 | 0.33x | $3.50 Million | $10.70 Million | ▼ -27.2% |
| 1998 | 0.45x | $4.00 Million | $8.90 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 1997 | 0.33x | $1.50 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -78.3% |
| 1996 | 1.54x | $6.30 Million | $4.10 Million | — |