NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (NSSC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (NSSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.48x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($28.01 Million) in one year. Check NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (NSSC) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NAPCO Security Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore NAPCO Security Technologies Inc assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NSSC market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.81x | $53.53 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2024 | 1.54x | $45.37 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | $24.70 Million | $28.86 Million | ▲ +172.0% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $8.33 Million | $26.48 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2021 | 0.66x | $22.99 Million | $34.78 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $10.31 Million | $27.96 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2019 | 0.59x | $8.65 Million | $14.74 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2018 | 0.80x | $7.87 Million | $9.82 Million | ▲ +357.3% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $2.45 Million | $13.97 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $9.16 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +223.6% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $3.89 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $4.74 Million | $19.61 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $4.90 Million | $23.57 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $4.10 Million | $27.03 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $4.36 Million | $33.37 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $5.29 Million | $39.43 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $6.79 Million | $41.07 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $3.78 Million | $23.03 Million | ▲ +204.5% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-3.67 Million | $23.38 Million | ▼ -1838.5% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-168.00K | $20.73 Million | ▼ -101.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $7.21 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2004 | 0.33x | $6.28 Million | $18.77 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $6.48 Million | $23.99 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $7.09 Million | $25.57 Million | ▲ +542.6% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $1.33 Million | $30.73 Million | ▼ -66.1% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $2.82 Million | $22.17 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $2.90 Million | $24.50 Million | ▲ +3627.3% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $29.80 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $2.80 Million | $26.00 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $3.50 Million | $27.70 Million | ▲ +389.2% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $700.00K | $27.10 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $1.40 Million | $25.80 Million | ▲ +431.0% |
| 1993 | -0.02x | $-400.00K | $24.40 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 1992 | -0.08x | $-1.60 Million | $19.60 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 1991 | -0.08x | $-1.40 Million | $17.60 Million | — |