NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (NSSC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (NSSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.48x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($28.01 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of NAPCO Security Technologies Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NAPCO Security Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore NAPCO Security Technologies Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see NSSC market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.81x | $53.53 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2024 | 1.54x | $45.37 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | $24.70 Million | $28.86 Million | ▲ +172.0% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $8.33 Million | $26.48 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2021 | 0.66x | $22.99 Million | $34.78 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $10.31 Million | $27.96 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2019 | 0.59x | $8.65 Million | $14.74 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2018 | 0.80x | $7.87 Million | $9.82 Million | ▲ +357.3% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $2.45 Million | $13.97 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $9.16 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +223.6% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $3.89 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $4.74 Million | $19.61 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $4.90 Million | $23.57 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $4.10 Million | $27.03 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $4.36 Million | $33.37 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $5.29 Million | $39.43 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $6.79 Million | $41.07 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $3.78 Million | $23.03 Million | ▲ +204.5% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-3.67 Million | $23.38 Million | ▼ -1838.5% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-168.00K | $20.73 Million | ▼ -101.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $7.21 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2004 | 0.33x | $6.28 Million | $18.77 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $6.48 Million | $23.99 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $7.09 Million | $25.57 Million | ▲ +542.6% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $1.33 Million | $30.73 Million | ▼ -66.1% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $2.82 Million | $22.17 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $2.90 Million | $24.50 Million | ▲ +3627.3% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $29.80 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $2.80 Million | $26.00 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $3.50 Million | $27.70 Million | ▲ +389.2% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $700.00K | $27.10 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $1.40 Million | $25.80 Million | ▲ +431.0% |
| 1993 | -0.02x | $-400.00K | $24.40 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 1992 | -0.08x | $-1.60 Million | $19.60 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 1991 | -0.08x | $-1.40 Million | $17.60 Million | — |