NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (NSSC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (NSSC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.48x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.36 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($28.01 Million) in one year. See NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (NSSC) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
NAPCO Security Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does NAPCO Security Technologies Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for NAPCO Security Technologies Inc. Check earnings quality score of NAPCO Security Technologies Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1.81x | $53.53 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2024 | 1.54x | $45.37 Million | $29.54 Million | ▲ +79.5% |
| 2023 | 0.86x | $24.70 Million | $28.86 Million | ▲ +172.0% |
| 2022 | 0.31x | $8.33 Million | $26.48 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 2021 | 0.66x | $22.99 Million | $34.78 Million | ▲ +79.3% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $10.31 Million | $27.96 Million | ▼ -37.2% |
| 2019 | 0.59x | $8.65 Million | $14.74 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2018 | 0.80x | $7.87 Million | $9.82 Million | ▲ +357.3% |
| 2017 | 0.18x | $2.45 Million | $13.97 Million | ▼ -74.2% |
| 2016 | 0.68x | $9.16 Million | $13.50 Million | ▲ +223.6% |
| 2015 | 0.21x | $3.89 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -13.3% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $4.74 Million | $19.61 Million | ▲ +16.3% |
| 2013 | 0.21x | $4.90 Million | $23.57 Million | ▲ +37.2% |
| 2012 | 0.15x | $4.10 Million | $27.03 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2011 | 0.13x | $4.36 Million | $33.37 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2010 | 0.13x | $5.29 Million | $39.43 Million | ▼ -18.9% |
| 2009 | 0.17x | $6.79 Million | $41.07 Million | ▲ +0.7% |
| 2008 | 0.16x | $3.78 Million | $23.03 Million | ▲ +204.5% |
| 2007 | -0.16x | $-3.67 Million | $23.38 Million | ▼ -1838.5% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-168.00K | $20.73 Million | ▼ -101.8% |
| 2005 | 0.44x | $7.21 Million | $16.23 Million | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2004 | 0.33x | $6.28 Million | $18.77 Million | ▲ +23.8% |
| 2003 | 0.27x | $6.48 Million | $23.99 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $7.09 Million | $25.57 Million | ▲ +542.6% |
| 2001 | 0.04x | $1.33 Million | $30.73 Million | ▼ -66.1% |
| 2000 | 0.13x | $2.82 Million | $22.17 Million | ▲ +7.5% |
| 1999 | 0.12x | $2.90 Million | $24.50 Million | ▲ +3627.3% |
| 1998 | 0.00x | $-100.00K | $29.80 Million | ▼ -103.1% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $2.80 Million | $26.00 Million | ▼ -14.8% |
| 1996 | 0.13x | $3.50 Million | $27.70 Million | ▲ +389.2% |
| 1995 | 0.03x | $700.00K | $27.10 Million | ▼ -52.4% |
| 1994 | 0.05x | $1.40 Million | $25.80 Million | ▲ +431.0% |
| 1993 | -0.02x | $-400.00K | $24.40 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 1992 | -0.08x | $-1.60 Million | $19.60 Million | ▼ -2.6% |
| 1991 | -0.08x | $-1.40 Million | $17.60 Million | — |