Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.17 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is Optical Cable Corporation to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Optical Cable Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Optical Cable Corporation across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Optical Cable Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Optical Cable Corporation. Check Optical Cable Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $1.41 Million | $18.49 Million | ▲ +274.2% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-857.02K | $19.52 Million | ▼ -112.6% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-395.68K | $19.16 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-1.59 Million | $18.40 Million | ▼ -164.1% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $2.12 Million | $15.71 Million | ▲ +180.8% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | $-3.55 Million | $21.30 Million | ▼ -1009.2% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | $-283.80K | $18.87 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $3.21 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +571.3% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | $-687.07K | $16.45 Million | ▼ -121.0% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $3.16 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +215.9% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $1.20 Million | $19.14 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $4.38 Million | $19.73 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $3.48 Million | $15.86 Million | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.98 Million | $17.73 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $2.35 Million | $17.22 Million | ▲ +110.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $1.15 Million | $17.71 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $2.77 Million | $17.07 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $2.96 Million | $20.00 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2007 | 1.13x | $6.00 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +8617.9% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-57.84K | $4.36 Million | ▼ -103.6% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $2.09 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2004 | 0.73x | $3.24 Million | $4.44 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2003 | 1.47x | $5.20 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2002 | 1.62x | $7.22 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +513.7% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $3.93 Million | $14.93 Million | ▲ +148.3% |
| 2000 | -0.55x | $-5.01 Million | $9.18 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1999 | 2.53x | $11.90 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 1998 | 3.43x | $9.60 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +225.7% |
| 1997 | 1.05x | $4.00 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $4.10 Million | $7.50 Million | — |