Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.17 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.67 Million) in one year. See Optical Cable Corporation free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Optical Cable Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Optical Cable Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore OCC net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Optical Cable Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Optical Cable Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OCC market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $1.41 Million | $18.49 Million | ▲ +274.2% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-857.02K | $19.52 Million | ▼ -112.6% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-395.68K | $19.16 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-1.59 Million | $18.40 Million | ▼ -164.1% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $2.12 Million | $15.71 Million | ▲ +180.8% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | $-3.55 Million | $21.30 Million | ▼ -1009.2% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | $-283.80K | $18.87 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $3.21 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +571.3% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | $-687.07K | $16.45 Million | ▼ -121.0% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $3.16 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +215.9% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $1.20 Million | $19.14 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $4.38 Million | $19.73 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $3.48 Million | $15.86 Million | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.98 Million | $17.73 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $2.35 Million | $17.22 Million | ▲ +110.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $1.15 Million | $17.71 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $2.77 Million | $17.07 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $2.96 Million | $20.00 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2007 | 1.13x | $6.00 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +8617.9% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-57.84K | $4.36 Million | ▼ -103.6% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $2.09 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2004 | 0.73x | $3.24 Million | $4.44 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2003 | 1.47x | $5.20 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2002 | 1.62x | $7.22 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +513.7% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $3.93 Million | $14.93 Million | ▲ +148.3% |
| 2000 | -0.55x | $-5.01 Million | $9.18 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1999 | 2.53x | $11.90 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 1998 | 3.43x | $9.60 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +225.7% |
| 1997 | 1.05x | $4.00 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $4.10 Million | $7.50 Million | — |