Optical Cable Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Optical Cable Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of July 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.58 Million) in one year. Check Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Optical Cable Corporation (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Optical Cable Corporation from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Optical Cable Corporation across 30 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Optical Cable Corporation to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Optical Cable Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
Optical Cable Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Optical Cable Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Optical Cable Corporation generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $1.41 Million | $18.49 Million | ▲ +274.2% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-857.02K | $19.52 Million | ▼ -112.6% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-395.68K | $19.16 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-1.59 Million | $18.40 Million | ▼ -164.1% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $2.12 Million | $15.71 Million | ▲ +180.8% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | $-3.55 Million | $21.30 Million | ▼ -1009.2% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | $-283.80K | $18.87 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $3.21 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +571.3% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | $-687.07K | $16.45 Million | ▼ -121.0% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $3.16 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +215.9% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $1.20 Million | $19.14 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $4.38 Million | $19.73 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $3.48 Million | $15.86 Million | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.98 Million | $17.73 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $2.35 Million | $17.22 Million | ▲ +110.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $1.15 Million | $17.71 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $2.77 Million | $17.07 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $2.96 Million | $20.00 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2007 | 1.13x | $6.00 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +8617.9% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-57.84K | $4.36 Million | ▼ -103.6% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $2.09 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2004 | 0.73x | $3.24 Million | $4.44 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2003 | 1.47x | $5.20 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2002 | 1.62x | $7.22 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +513.7% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $3.93 Million | $14.93 Million | ▲ +148.3% |
| 2000 | -0.55x | $-5.01 Million | $9.18 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1999 | 2.53x | $11.90 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 1998 | 3.43x | $9.60 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +225.7% |
| 1997 | 1.05x | $4.00 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $4.10 Million | $7.50 Million | — |