Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Optical Cable Corporation (OCC) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.13x as of April 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.17 Million) in one year. Explore OCC long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Optical Cable Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Optical Cable Corporation across 30 annual periods. Also explore Optical Cable Corporation total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Optical Cable Corporation (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Optical Cable Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OCC company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.08x | $1.41 Million | $18.49 Million | ▲ +274.2% |
| 2024 | -0.04x | $-857.02K | $19.52 Million | ▼ -112.6% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-395.68K | $19.16 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 2022 | -0.09x | $-1.59 Million | $18.40 Million | ▼ -164.1% |
| 2021 | 0.13x | $2.12 Million | $15.71 Million | ▲ +180.8% |
| 2020 | -0.17x | $-3.55 Million | $21.30 Million | ▼ -1009.2% |
| 2019 | -0.02x | $-283.80K | $18.87 Million | ▼ -107.6% |
| 2018 | 0.20x | $3.21 Million | $16.29 Million | ▲ +571.3% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | $-687.07K | $16.45 Million | ▼ -121.0% |
| 2016 | 0.20x | $3.16 Million | $15.90 Million | ▲ +215.9% |
| 2015 | 0.06x | $1.20 Million | $19.14 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2014 | 0.22x | $4.38 Million | $19.73 Million | ▲ +1.4% |
| 2013 | 0.22x | $3.48 Million | $15.86 Million | ▲ +95.8% |
| 2012 | 0.11x | $1.98 Million | $17.73 Million | ▼ -18.0% |
| 2011 | 0.14x | $2.35 Million | $17.22 Million | ▲ +110.2% |
| 2010 | 0.06x | $1.15 Million | $17.71 Million | ▼ -59.9% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $2.77 Million | $17.07 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 2008 | 0.15x | $2.96 Million | $20.00 Million | ▼ -86.9% |
| 2007 | 1.13x | $6.00 Million | $5.30 Million | ▲ +8617.9% |
| 2006 | -0.01x | $-57.84K | $4.36 Million | ▼ -103.6% |
| 2005 | 0.37x | $2.09 Million | $5.60 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2004 | 0.73x | $3.24 Million | $4.44 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2003 | 1.47x | $5.20 Million | $3.55 Million | ▼ -9.3% |
| 2002 | 1.62x | $7.22 Million | $4.47 Million | ▲ +513.7% |
| 2001 | 0.26x | $3.93 Million | $14.93 Million | ▲ +148.3% |
| 2000 | -0.55x | $-5.01 Million | $9.18 Million | ▼ -121.5% |
| 1999 | 2.53x | $11.90 Million | $4.70 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 1998 | 3.43x | $9.60 Million | $2.80 Million | ▲ +225.7% |
| 1997 | 1.05x | $4.00 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +92.6% |
| 1996 | 0.55x | $4.10 Million | $7.50 Million | — |