OKYO Pharma Ltd ADR (OKYO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: -0.19x

OKYO Pharma Ltd ADR (OKYO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.19x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.53 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($8.06 Million) in one year. See OKYO Pharma Ltd ADR working capital to net assets to evaluate short-term liquidity relative to the company's equity base.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.19x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$-1.53 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$8.06 Million
USD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

OKYO Pharma Ltd ADR Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2008–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for OKYO Pharma Ltd ADR across 18 annual periods. Also explore OKYO year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for OKYO Pharma Ltd ADR (2008–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for OKYO Pharma Ltd ADR. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of OKYO Pharma Ltd ADR.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.20x $-1.81 Million $9.23 Million ▲ +84.7%
2024 -1.28x $-9.49 Million $7.42 Million ▼ -20.6%
2023 -1.06x $-7.70 Million $7.26 Million ▲ +73.8%
2022 -4.04x $-5.47 Million $1.35 Million ▼ -347.4%
2021 -0.90x $-1.60 Million $1.77 Million ▲ +44.6%
2020 -1.63x $-1.20 Million $737.20K ▲ +65.0%
2019 -4.66x $-1.99 Million $426.72K ▲ +73.4%
2018 -17.51x $-1.59 Million $91.06K ▼ -595.9%
2017 -2.52x $-651.27K $258.76K ▲ +29.9%
2016 -3.59x $-650.88K $181.34K ▲ +61.7%
2015 -9.38x $-1.42 Million $151.07K ▲ +32.6%
2014 -13.93x $-3.45 Million $247.95K ▲ +33.2%
2013 -20.85x $-3.82 Million $183.32K ▼ -271.7%
2012 -5.61x $-4.67 Million $832.89K ▲ +66.3%
2011 -16.63x $-1.31 Million $78.74K ▼ -51.2%
2010 -11.00x $-878.61K $79.87K ▼ -317.7%
2009 -2.63x $-226.35K $85.96K ▲ +25.8%
2008 -3.55x $-513.95K $144.86K
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.