Olenox Industries Inc. (OLOX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Olenox Industries Inc. (OLOX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-638.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($29.17 Million) in one year. See Olenox Industries Inc. (OLOX) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Olenox Industries Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Olenox Industries Inc. across 29 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Olenox Industries Inc..
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Olenox Industries Inc. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olenox Industries Inc.. Check Olenox Industries Inc. earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.59x | $-10.90 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -93.9% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-7.14 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2022 | -0.46x | $-5.63 Million | $12.12 Million | ▼ -826.1% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-662.76K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2020 | -0.34x | $-2.89 Million | $8.44 Million | ▲ +72.4% |
| 2019 | -1.24x | $-2.82 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2018 | -0.87x | $-3.45 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -168.2% |
| 2017 | -0.33x | $-1.24 Million | $3.82 Million | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2016 | -0.56x | $-1.87 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -215.2% |
| 2015 | -0.18x | $-1.19 Million | $6.63 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2014 | -0.23x | $-1.05 Million | $4.68 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2013 | -0.35x | $-1.08 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2012 | -0.66x | $-1.27 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2011 | -1.59x | $-1.59 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -139.8% |
| 2010 | -0.66x | $-33.42K | $50.51K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2009 | -0.98x | $-33.19K | $33.72K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2008 | -2.63x | $-30.59K | $11.65K | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2007 | -1.76x | $-11.73K | $6.65K | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2006 | -3.93x | $-29.85K | $7.60K | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2005 | -4.47x | $-31.29K | $7.00K | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2004 | -6.30x | $-46.28K | $7.35K | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2003 | -3.75x | $-50.75K | $13.53K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2002 | -3.59x | $-50.60K | $14.11K | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2001 | -2.59x | $-87.50K | $33.83K | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2000 | -1.47x | $-106.99K | $72.63K | ▲ +85.0% |
| 1999 | -9.82x | $-1.39 Million | $141.04K | ▲ +27.4% |
| 1998 | -13.53x | $-2.36 Million | $174.73K | ▼ -196.9% |
| 1997 | -4.56x | $-1.06 Million | $232.82K | ▼ -225.5% |
| 1996 | -1.40x | $-700.00K | $500.00K | — |