Olenox Industries Inc. (OLOX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Olenox Industries Inc. (OLOX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-638.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($29.17 Million) in one year. See OLOX FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Olenox Industries Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Olenox Industries Inc. across 29 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Olenox Industries Inc. to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Olenox Industries Inc. (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olenox Industries Inc.. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Olenox Industries Inc. (OLOX) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.59x | $-10.90 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -93.9% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-7.14 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2022 | -0.46x | $-5.63 Million | $12.12 Million | ▼ -826.1% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-662.76K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2020 | -0.34x | $-2.89 Million | $8.44 Million | ▲ +72.4% |
| 2019 | -1.24x | $-2.82 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2018 | -0.87x | $-3.45 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -168.2% |
| 2017 | -0.33x | $-1.24 Million | $3.82 Million | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2016 | -0.56x | $-1.87 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -215.2% |
| 2015 | -0.18x | $-1.19 Million | $6.63 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2014 | -0.23x | $-1.05 Million | $4.68 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2013 | -0.35x | $-1.08 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2012 | -0.66x | $-1.27 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2011 | -1.59x | $-1.59 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -139.8% |
| 2010 | -0.66x | $-33.42K | $50.51K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2009 | -0.98x | $-33.19K | $33.72K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2008 | -2.63x | $-30.59K | $11.65K | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2007 | -1.76x | $-11.73K | $6.65K | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2006 | -3.93x | $-29.85K | $7.60K | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2005 | -4.47x | $-31.29K | $7.00K | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2004 | -6.30x | $-46.28K | $7.35K | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2003 | -3.75x | $-50.75K | $13.53K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2002 | -3.59x | $-50.60K | $14.11K | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2001 | -2.59x | $-87.50K | $33.83K | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2000 | -1.47x | $-106.99K | $72.63K | ▲ +85.0% |
| 1999 | -9.82x | $-1.39 Million | $141.04K | ▲ +27.4% |
| 1998 | -13.53x | $-2.36 Million | $174.73K | ▼ -196.9% |
| 1997 | -4.56x | $-1.06 Million | $232.82K | ▼ -225.5% |
| 1996 | -1.40x | $-700.00K | $500.00K | — |