Olenox Industries Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Olenox Industries Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio. Olenox Industries Inc. (OLOX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-638.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($29.17 Million) in one year. Check OLOX cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Olenox Industries Inc. (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Olenox Industries Inc. from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Olenox Industries Inc. across 29 annual periods. Check OLOX total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Olenox Industries Inc. Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
Olenox Industries Inc. cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olenox Industries Inc.. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see OLOX cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.59x | $-10.90 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -93.9% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-7.14 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2022 | -0.46x | $-5.63 Million | $12.12 Million | ▼ -826.1% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-662.76K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2020 | -0.34x | $-2.89 Million | $8.44 Million | ▲ +72.4% |
| 2019 | -1.24x | $-2.82 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2018 | -0.87x | $-3.45 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -168.2% |
| 2017 | -0.33x | $-1.24 Million | $3.82 Million | ▲ +42.5% |
| 2016 | -0.56x | $-1.87 Million | $3.30 Million | ▼ -215.2% |
| 2015 | -0.18x | $-1.19 Million | $6.63 Million | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2014 | -0.23x | $-1.05 Million | $4.68 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2013 | -0.35x | $-1.08 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2012 | -0.66x | $-1.27 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2011 | -1.59x | $-1.59 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -139.8% |
| 2010 | -0.66x | $-33.42K | $50.51K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2009 | -0.98x | $-33.19K | $33.72K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2008 | -2.63x | $-30.59K | $11.65K | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2007 | -1.76x | $-11.73K | $6.65K | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2006 | -3.93x | $-29.85K | $7.60K | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2005 | -4.47x | $-31.29K | $7.00K | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2004 | -6.30x | $-46.28K | $7.35K | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2003 | -3.75x | $-50.75K | $13.53K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2002 | -3.59x | $-50.60K | $14.11K | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2001 | -2.59x | $-87.50K | $33.83K | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2000 | -1.47x | $-106.99K | $72.63K | ▲ +85.0% |
| 1999 | -9.82x | $-1.39 Million | $141.04K | ▲ +27.4% |
| 1998 | -13.53x | $-2.36 Million | $174.73K | ▼ -196.9% |
| 1997 | -4.56x | $-1.06 Million | $232.82K | ▼ -225.5% |
| 1996 | -1.40x | $-700.00K | $500.00K | — |