OraSure Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
OraSure Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. OraSure Technologies Inc (OSUR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-9.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($62.34 Million) in one year. Check cash flow quality index of OraSure Technologies Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of OraSure Technologies Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of OraSure Technologies Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for OraSure Technologies Inc across 37 annual periods. Check OraSure Technologies Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
OraSure Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
OraSure Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for OraSure Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see OraSure Technologies Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $-49.02K | $62.34 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $27.37 Million | $69.32 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2023 | 2.71x | $141.58 Million | $52.17 Million | ▲ +558.5% |
| 2022 | -0.59x | $-47.20 Million | $79.75 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2021 | -0.44x | $-35.38 Million | $80.46 Million | ▼ -523.3% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $5.81 Million | $55.90 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $9.80 Million | $42.15 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2018 | 1.21x | $39.09 Million | $32.19 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2017 | 0.74x | $28.16 Million | $38.12 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2016 | 1.03x | $22.77 Million | $22.09 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2015 | 0.53x | $15.77 Million | $29.89 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $7.53 Million | $30.93 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $8.29 Million | $23.10 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $5.37 Million | $21.41 Million | ▲ +331.4% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-2.99 Million | $27.61 Million | ▼ -154.9% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $3.89 Million | $19.68 Million | ▲ +1664.4% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | $-292.76K | $23.18 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2008 | -0.10x | $-2.46 Million | $23.59 Million | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $11.58 Million | $27.30 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2006 | 0.62x | $16.89 Million | $27.06 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2005 | 0.88x | $10.39 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $3.44 Million | $12.49 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $2.70 Million | $12.64 Million | ▲ +501.3% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | $-517.51K | $9.72 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2001 | -0.49x | $-5.26 Million | $10.74 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2000 | -0.86x | $-9.99 Million | $11.56 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 1999 | -1.14x | $-2.40 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 1998 | -0.71x | $-1.50 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 1997 | -1.15x | $-2.30 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -804.7% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-1.50 Million | $11.80 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 1995 | -1.87x | $-14.60 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1994 | -2.18x | $-13.30 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 1993 | -1.70x | $-10.40 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -109.1% |
| 1992 | -0.82x | $-5.30 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 1991 | -3.56x | $-3.20 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1990 | -3.86x | $-2.70 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -57.8% |
| 1989 | -2.44x | $-2.20 Million | $900.00K | — |