OraSure Technologies Inc (OSUR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
OraSure Technologies Inc (OSUR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-9.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($62.34 Million) in one year. See how financially flexible is OraSure Technologies Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
OraSure Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for OraSure Technologies Inc across 37 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see OraSure Technologies Inc cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for OraSure Technologies Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for OraSure Technologies Inc. Check OSUR cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $-49.02K | $62.34 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $27.37 Million | $69.32 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2023 | 2.71x | $141.58 Million | $52.17 Million | ▲ +558.5% |
| 2022 | -0.59x | $-47.20 Million | $79.75 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2021 | -0.44x | $-35.38 Million | $80.46 Million | ▼ -523.3% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $5.81 Million | $55.90 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $9.80 Million | $42.15 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2018 | 1.21x | $39.09 Million | $32.19 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2017 | 0.74x | $28.16 Million | $38.12 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2016 | 1.03x | $22.77 Million | $22.09 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2015 | 0.53x | $15.77 Million | $29.89 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $7.53 Million | $30.93 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $8.29 Million | $23.10 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $5.37 Million | $21.41 Million | ▲ +331.4% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-2.99 Million | $27.61 Million | ▼ -154.9% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $3.89 Million | $19.68 Million | ▲ +1664.4% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | $-292.76K | $23.18 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2008 | -0.10x | $-2.46 Million | $23.59 Million | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $11.58 Million | $27.30 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2006 | 0.62x | $16.89 Million | $27.06 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2005 | 0.88x | $10.39 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $3.44 Million | $12.49 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $2.70 Million | $12.64 Million | ▲ +501.3% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | $-517.51K | $9.72 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2001 | -0.49x | $-5.26 Million | $10.74 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2000 | -0.86x | $-9.99 Million | $11.56 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 1999 | -1.14x | $-2.40 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 1998 | -0.71x | $-1.50 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 1997 | -1.15x | $-2.30 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -804.7% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-1.50 Million | $11.80 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 1995 | -1.87x | $-14.60 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1994 | -2.18x | $-13.30 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 1993 | -1.70x | $-10.40 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -109.1% |
| 1992 | -0.82x | $-5.30 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 1991 | -3.56x | $-3.20 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1990 | -3.86x | $-2.70 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -57.8% |
| 1989 | -2.44x | $-2.20 Million | $900.00K | — |