OraSure Technologies Inc (OSUR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
OraSure Technologies Inc (OSUR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-9.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($62.34 Million) in one year. Explore long-term investment intensity of OraSure Technologies Inc to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
OraSure Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for OraSure Technologies Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore OSUR asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for OraSure Technologies Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for OraSure Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of OraSure Technologies Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $-49.02K | $62.34 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $27.37 Million | $69.32 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2023 | 2.71x | $141.58 Million | $52.17 Million | ▲ +558.5% |
| 2022 | -0.59x | $-47.20 Million | $79.75 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2021 | -0.44x | $-35.38 Million | $80.46 Million | ▼ -523.3% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $5.81 Million | $55.90 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $9.80 Million | $42.15 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2018 | 1.21x | $39.09 Million | $32.19 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2017 | 0.74x | $28.16 Million | $38.12 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2016 | 1.03x | $22.77 Million | $22.09 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2015 | 0.53x | $15.77 Million | $29.89 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $7.53 Million | $30.93 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $8.29 Million | $23.10 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $5.37 Million | $21.41 Million | ▲ +331.4% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-2.99 Million | $27.61 Million | ▼ -154.9% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $3.89 Million | $19.68 Million | ▲ +1664.4% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | $-292.76K | $23.18 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2008 | -0.10x | $-2.46 Million | $23.59 Million | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $11.58 Million | $27.30 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2006 | 0.62x | $16.89 Million | $27.06 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2005 | 0.88x | $10.39 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $3.44 Million | $12.49 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $2.70 Million | $12.64 Million | ▲ +501.3% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | $-517.51K | $9.72 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2001 | -0.49x | $-5.26 Million | $10.74 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2000 | -0.86x | $-9.99 Million | $11.56 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 1999 | -1.14x | $-2.40 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 1998 | -0.71x | $-1.50 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 1997 | -1.15x | $-2.30 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -804.7% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-1.50 Million | $11.80 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 1995 | -1.87x | $-14.60 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1994 | -2.18x | $-13.30 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 1993 | -1.70x | $-10.40 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -109.1% |
| 1992 | -0.82x | $-5.30 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 1991 | -3.56x | $-3.20 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1990 | -3.86x | $-2.70 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -57.8% |
| 1989 | -2.44x | $-2.20 Million | $900.00K | — |