OraSure Technologies Inc (OSUR) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
OraSure Technologies Inc (OSUR) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.14x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-9.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($62.34 Million) in one year. See OSUR free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
OraSure Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1989–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for OraSure Technologies Inc across 37 annual periods. Also explore OraSure Technologies Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for OraSure Technologies Inc (1989–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for OraSure Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see OraSure Technologies Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.00x | $-49.02K | $62.34 Million | ▼ -100.2% |
| 2024 | 0.39x | $27.37 Million | $69.32 Million | ▼ -85.4% |
| 2023 | 2.71x | $141.58 Million | $52.17 Million | ▲ +558.5% |
| 2022 | -0.59x | $-47.20 Million | $79.75 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2021 | -0.44x | $-35.38 Million | $80.46 Million | ▼ -523.3% |
| 2020 | 0.10x | $5.81 Million | $55.90 Million | ▼ -55.3% |
| 2019 | 0.23x | $9.80 Million | $42.15 Million | ▼ -80.8% |
| 2018 | 1.21x | $39.09 Million | $32.19 Million | ▲ +64.4% |
| 2017 | 0.74x | $28.16 Million | $38.12 Million | ▼ -28.4% |
| 2016 | 1.03x | $22.77 Million | $22.09 Million | ▲ +95.3% |
| 2015 | 0.53x | $15.77 Million | $29.89 Million | ▲ +116.9% |
| 2014 | 0.24x | $7.53 Million | $30.93 Million | ▼ -32.2% |
| 2013 | 0.36x | $8.29 Million | $23.10 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2012 | 0.25x | $5.37 Million | $21.41 Million | ▲ +331.4% |
| 2011 | -0.11x | $-2.99 Million | $27.61 Million | ▼ -154.9% |
| 2010 | 0.20x | $3.89 Million | $19.68 Million | ▲ +1664.4% |
| 2009 | -0.01x | $-292.76K | $23.18 Million | ▲ +87.9% |
| 2008 | -0.10x | $-2.46 Million | $23.59 Million | ▼ -124.6% |
| 2007 | 0.42x | $11.58 Million | $27.30 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2006 | 0.62x | $16.89 Million | $27.06 Million | ▼ -29.0% |
| 2005 | 0.88x | $10.39 Million | $11.83 Million | ▲ +219.1% |
| 2004 | 0.28x | $3.44 Million | $12.49 Million | ▲ +28.8% |
| 2003 | 0.21x | $2.70 Million | $12.64 Million | ▲ +501.3% |
| 2002 | -0.05x | $-517.51K | $9.72 Million | ▲ +89.1% |
| 2001 | -0.49x | $-5.26 Million | $10.74 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2000 | -0.86x | $-9.99 Million | $11.56 Million | ▲ +24.4% |
| 1999 | -1.14x | $-2.40 Million | $2.10 Million | ▼ -60.0% |
| 1998 | -0.71x | $-1.50 Million | $2.10 Million | ▲ +37.9% |
| 1997 | -1.15x | $-2.30 Million | $2.00 Million | ▼ -804.7% |
| 1996 | -0.13x | $-1.50 Million | $11.80 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 1995 | -1.87x | $-14.60 Million | $7.80 Million | ▲ +14.2% |
| 1994 | -2.18x | $-13.30 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -27.9% |
| 1993 | -1.70x | $-10.40 Million | $6.10 Million | ▼ -109.1% |
| 1992 | -0.82x | $-5.30 Million | $6.50 Million | ▲ +77.1% |
| 1991 | -3.56x | $-3.20 Million | $900.00K | ▲ +7.8% |
| 1990 | -3.86x | $-2.70 Million | $700.00K | ▼ -57.8% |
| 1989 | -2.44x | $-2.20 Million | $900.00K | — |