Ontrak Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ontrak Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Ontrak Inc (OTRK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.20x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-2.72 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($13.62 Million) in one year. Check OTRK cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Ontrak Inc (2001–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Ontrak Inc from 2001 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Ontrak Inc across 24 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Ontrak Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Ontrak Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2024)
Ontrak Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ontrak Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Ontrak Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -1.20x | $-13.44 Million | $11.21 Million | ▲ +56.9% |
| 2023 | -2.78x | $-15.50 Million | $5.58 Million | ▼ -132.9% |
| 2022 | -1.19x | $-23.97 Million | $20.08 Million | ▼ -119.6% |
| 2021 | -0.54x | $-26.16 Million | $48.13 Million | ▼ -626.3% |
| 2020 | -0.07x | $-6.28 Million | $83.95 Million | ▲ +78.9% |
| 2019 | -0.35x | $-16.90 Million | $47.76 Million | ▲ +36.9% |
| 2018 | -0.56x | $-8.57 Million | $15.29 Million | ▲ +56.6% |
| 2017 | -1.29x | $-7.37 Million | $5.71 Million | ▼ -541.2% |
| 2016 | -0.20x | $-5.73 Million | $28.43 Million | ▲ +54.8% |
| 2015 | -0.45x | $-5.17 Million | $11.60 Million | ▼ -268.0% |
| 2014 | -0.12x | $-5.27 Million | $43.58 Million | ▲ +57.9% |
| 2013 | -0.29x | $-5.93 Million | $20.67 Million | ▲ +12.7% |
| 2012 | -0.33x | $-6.15 Million | $18.69 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2011 | -0.85x | $-6.84 Million | $8.08 Million | ▼ -81.9% |
| 2010 | -0.47x | $-8.43 Million | $18.12 Million | ▲ +47.2% |
| 2009 | -0.88x | $-14.50 Million | $16.46 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2008 | -0.96x | $-29.45 Million | $30.76 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 2007 | -1.43x | $-39.22 Million | $27.38 Million | ▲ +48.7% |
| 2006 | -2.79x | $-28.43 Million | $10.18 Million | ▲ +29.8% |
| 2005 | -3.98x | $-18.79 Million | $4.72 Million | ▲ +17.4% |
| 2004 | -4.82x | $-10.25 Million | $2.13 Million | ▼ -501.5% |
| 2003 | -0.80x | $-1.68 Million | $2.09 Million | ▼ -334.6% |
| 2002 | -0.18x | $-103.70K | $562.85K | ▲ +98.2% |
| 2001 | -10.42x | $-103.03K | $9.89K | — |