Pro-Dex Inc (PDEX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Pro-Dex Inc (PDEX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.57 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($20.62 Million) in one year. See Pro-Dex Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Pro-Dex Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Pro-Dex Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore how fast is Pro-Dex Inc growing its equity to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Pro-Dex Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Pro-Dex Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see PDEX stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.07x | $-1.68 Million | $24.56 Million | ▼ -123.9% |
| 2024 | 0.29x | $6.20 Million | $21.61 Million | ▲ +6.3% |
| 2023 | 0.27x | $5.46 Million | $20.23 Million | ▲ +854.0% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-847.00K | $23.66 Million | ▲ +59.2% |
| 2021 | -0.09x | $-2.08 Million | $23.66 Million | ▼ -118.0% |
| 2020 | 0.49x | $5.90 Million | $12.06 Million | ▲ +25.1% |
| 2019 | 0.39x | $3.33 Million | $8.51 Million | ▼ -66.7% |
| 2018 | 1.17x | $3.10 Million | $2.64 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2017 | 1.22x | $3.23 Million | $2.64 Million | ▲ +496.7% |
| 2016 | 0.21x | $466.00K | $2.27 Million | ▲ +207.0% |
| 2015 | -0.19x | $-775.00K | $4.04 Million | ▼ -45.4% |
| 2014 | -0.13x | $-329.00K | $2.49 Million | ▲ +72.4% |
| 2013 | -0.48x | $-1.27 Million | $2.66 Million | ▼ -3576.9% |
| 2012 | 0.01x | $45.00K | $3.27 Million | ▼ -97.5% |
| 2011 | 0.55x | $2.90 Million | $5.24 Million | ▲ +13.8% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $3.24 Million | $6.66 Million | ▲ +69.4% |
| 2009 | 0.29x | $1.72 Million | $5.99 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2008 | 0.24x | $2.02 Million | $8.37 Million | ▼ -14.4% |
| 2007 | 0.28x | $1.48 Million | $5.26 Million | ▲ +2808.5% |
| 2006 | 0.01x | $55.00K | $5.68 Million | ▼ -97.1% |
| 2005 | 0.34x | $557.00K | $1.64 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2004 | 0.96x | $2.05 Million | $2.13 Million | ▲ +218.5% |
| 2003 | 0.30x | $503.00K | $1.66 Million | ▲ +145.6% |
| 2002 | -0.66x | $-1.76 Million | $2.65 Million | ▼ -411.9% |
| 2001 | 0.21x | $616.00K | $2.90 Million | ▲ +11.9% |
| 2000 | 0.19x | $1.99 Million | $10.49 Million | ▲ +861.6% |
| 1999 | -0.02x | $-336.00K | $13.47 Million | ▼ -111.5% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $2.10 Million | $9.68 Million | ▲ +347.2% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-1.00 Million | $11.40 Million | ▼ -195.6% |
| 1996 | 0.09x | $1.00 Million | $10.90 Million | ▲ +265.1% |
| 1995 | -0.06x | $-100.00K | $1.80 Million | ▼ -144.4% |
| 1994 | 0.13x | $200.00K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +312.5% |
| 1993 | -0.06x | $-100.00K | $1.70 Million | ▲ +29.4% |
| 1992 | -0.08x | $-100.00K | $1.20 Million | ▲ +83.3% |
| 1991 | -0.50x | $-400.00K | $800.00K | — |