Perma-Pipe International Holdings Inc (PPIH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Perma-Pipe International Holdings Inc (PPIH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.06x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.80 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($111.19 Million) in one year. See Perma-Pipe International Holdings Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Perma-Pipe International Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2026)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Perma-Pipe International Holdings Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore PPIH net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Perma-Pipe International Holdings Inc (1992–2026)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Perma-Pipe International Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Perma-Pipe International Holdings Inc (PPIH) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.08x | $9.17 Million | $111.19 Million | ▼ -51.4% |
| 2025 | 0.17x | $13.93 Million | $82.14 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2024 | 0.18x | $14.73 Million | $83.73 Million | ▲ +1024.0% |
| 2023 | -0.02x | $-1.24 Million | $65.18 Million | ▲ +49.0% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-2.57 Million | $68.94 Million | ▼ -1307.8% |
| 2021 | 0.00x | $165.00K | $53.38 Million | ▼ -95.7% |
| 2020 | 0.07x | $4.09 Million | $56.60 Million | ▼ -26.7% |
| 2019 | 0.10x | $4.98 Million | $50.50 Million | ▲ +382.4% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | $-1.84 Million | $52.77 Million | ▲ +65.2% |
| 2017 | -0.10x | $-4.23 Million | $42.20 Million | ▼ -139.1% |
| 2016 | -0.04x | $-2.90 Million | $69.07 Million | ▼ -176.9% |
| 2015 | 0.05x | $4.11 Million | $75.27 Million | ▼ -26.2% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $6.40 Million | $86.63 Million | ▲ +31.6% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $5.35 Million | $95.23 Million | ▲ +2610.2% |
| 2012 | 0.00x | $-190.00K | $84.93 Million | ▼ -102.2% |
| 2011 | 0.10x | $8.69 Million | $85.22 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2010 | 0.44x | $34.59 Million | $79.39 Million | ▲ +2453.9% |
| 2009 | -0.02x | $-2.17 Million | $116.97 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2008 | -0.09x | $-7.35 Million | $80.63 Million | ▼ -8.8% |
| 2007 | -0.08x | $-6.92 Million | $82.62 Million | ▼ -323.0% |
| 2006 | 0.04x | $2.13 Million | $56.83 Million | ▲ +918.1% |
| 2005 | 0.00x | $-249.00K | $54.25 Million | ▼ -103.5% |
| 2004 | 0.13x | $6.79 Million | $52.05 Million | ▲ +136.4% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $2.89 Million | $52.36 Million | ▼ -64.8% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $8.56 Million | $54.54 Million | ▲ +233.6% |
| 2001 | 0.05x | $3.10 Million | $65.99 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $6.10 Million | $59.95 Million | ▲ +102.8% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $3.10 Million | $61.82 Million | ▲ +1059.5% |
| 1998 | -0.01x | $-300.00K | $57.40 Million | ▼ -104.7% |
| 1997 | 0.11x | $4.70 Million | $42.40 Million | ▲ +430.5% |
| 1996 | -0.03x | $-1.10 Million | $32.80 Million | ▲ +78.2% |
| 1995 | -0.15x | $-3.70 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -342.0% |
| 1994 | 0.06x | $1.00 Million | $15.70 Million | ▼ -85.1% |
| 1993 | 0.43x | $900.00K | $2.10 Million | ▲ +39.3% |
| 1992 | 0.31x | $800.00K | $2.60 Million | — |