Performance Shipping Inc (PSHG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.06x

Performance Shipping Inc (PSHG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $13.49 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($238.03 Million) in one year. Check Performance Shipping Inc cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.06x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$13.49 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$238.03 Million
USD

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Performance Shipping Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2010–2024)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Performance Shipping Inc across 15 annual periods. Also explore Performance Shipping Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Performance Shipping Inc (2010–2024)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Performance Shipping Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Performance Shipping Inc market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 1.08x $59.67 Million $55.15 Million ▲ +0.4%
2023 1.08x $67.95 Million $63.08 Million ▲ +336.9%
2022 0.25x $33.85 Million $137.27 Million ▲ +554.6%
2021 -0.05x $-3.12 Million $57.58 Million ▼ -125.1%
2020 0.22x $13.18 Million $61.06 Million ▲ +286.9%
2019 -0.12x $-4.19 Million $36.33 Million ▼ -57.8%
2018 -0.07x $-330.00K $4.51 Million ▲ +41.3%
2017 -0.12x $-12.65 Million $101.53 Million ▼ -83.0%
2016 -0.07x $-11.96 Million $175.65 Million ▼ -176.7%
2015 0.09x $17.45 Million $196.55 Million ▼ -46.8%
2014 0.17x $25.49 Million $152.82 Million ▼ -20.0%
2013 0.21x $31.74 Million $152.24 Million ▼ -34.6%
2012 0.32x $31.35 Million $98.29 Million ▼ -91.1%
2011 3.59x $12.50 Million $3.48 Million ▲ +40057.7%
2010 -0.01x $-186.53K $20.74 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.