Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock (PSIX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock (PSIX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.62 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($265.79 Million) in one year. Check PSIX cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2004–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock across 22 annual periods. Also explore Power Solutions International, Inc. Comm total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock (2004–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Power Solutions International, Inc. Comm worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $24.11 Million | $265.79 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2024 | 0.24x | $62.39 Million | $262.93 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $70.51 Million | $288.22 Million | ▲ +1068.9% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-8.85 Million | $350.29 Million | ▲ +85.9% |
| 2021 | -0.18x | $-61.48 Million | $342.56 Million | ▼ -556.7% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | $-7.59 Million | $277.88 Million | ▼ -146.4% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $18.16 Million | $308.46 Million | ▲ +264.3% |
| 2018 | -0.04x | $-7.70 Million | $214.85 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | $-7.70 Million | $214.85 Million | ▼ -124.8% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $32.28 Million | $223.96 Million | ▲ +258.6% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-23.05 Million | $253.64 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-15.69 Million | $171.84 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2013 | -0.16x | $-12.44 Million | $76.20 Million | ▼ -277.5% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-2.94 Million | $68.03 Million | ▼ -147.7% |
| 2011 | -0.02x | $-973.00K | $55.76 Million | ▼ -109.9% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $43.37K | $247.24K | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $36.55K | $233.86K | ▲ +267.1% |
| 2008 | -0.09x | $-20.91K | $223.67K | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2007 | -0.24x | $-47.11K | $199.14K | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2006 | -0.40x | $-57.08K | $142.40K | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2005 | -0.38x | $-20.98K | $55.56K | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2004 | -0.49x | $-22.41K | $45.66K | — |