Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock (PSIX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock (PSIX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.62 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($265.79 Million) in one year. See PSIX cash flow after capex ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2004–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock across 22 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Power Solutions International, Inc. Comm to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock (2004–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Power Solutions International, Inc. Common Stock. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Power Solutions International, Inc. Comm (PSIX) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.09x | $24.11 Million | $265.79 Million | ▼ -61.8% |
| 2024 | 0.24x | $62.39 Million | $262.93 Million | ▼ -3.0% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $70.51 Million | $288.22 Million | ▲ +1068.9% |
| 2022 | -0.03x | $-8.85 Million | $350.29 Million | ▲ +85.9% |
| 2021 | -0.18x | $-61.48 Million | $342.56 Million | ▼ -556.7% |
| 2020 | -0.03x | $-7.59 Million | $277.88 Million | ▼ -146.4% |
| 2019 | 0.06x | $18.16 Million | $308.46 Million | ▲ +264.3% |
| 2018 | -0.04x | $-7.70 Million | $214.85 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2017 | -0.04x | $-7.70 Million | $214.85 Million | ▼ -124.8% |
| 2016 | 0.14x | $32.28 Million | $223.96 Million | ▲ +258.6% |
| 2015 | -0.09x | $-23.05 Million | $253.64 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-15.69 Million | $171.84 Million | ▲ +44.1% |
| 2013 | -0.16x | $-12.44 Million | $76.20 Million | ▼ -277.5% |
| 2012 | -0.04x | $-2.94 Million | $68.03 Million | ▼ -147.7% |
| 2011 | -0.02x | $-973.00K | $55.76 Million | ▼ -109.9% |
| 2010 | 0.18x | $43.37K | $247.24K | ▲ +12.2% |
| 2009 | 0.16x | $36.55K | $233.86K | ▲ +267.1% |
| 2008 | -0.09x | $-20.91K | $223.67K | ▲ +60.5% |
| 2007 | -0.24x | $-47.11K | $199.14K | ▲ +41.0% |
| 2006 | -0.40x | $-57.08K | $142.40K | ▼ -6.2% |
| 2005 | -0.38x | $-20.98K | $55.56K | ▲ +23.1% |
| 2004 | -0.49x | $-22.41K | $45.66K | — |