Quipt Home Medical Corp (QIPT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Quipt Home Medical Corp (QIPT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($167.66 Million) in one year. Explore Quipt Home Medical Corp (QIPT) long-term investment share to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Quipt Home Medical Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Quipt Home Medical Corp across 27 annual periods. Also explore QIPT total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Quipt Home Medical Corp (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Quipt Home Medical Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Quipt Home Medical Corp.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $37.69 Million | $171.19 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $35.38 Million | $140.06 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.27x | $36.98 Million | $136.29 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $26.34 Million | $52.67 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $17.76 Million | $49.95 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $9.89 Million | $41.54 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | $8.39 Million | $33.44 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2018 | 0.46x | $10.64 Million | $23.09 Million | ▲ +333.9% |
| 2017 | -0.20x | $-6.07 Million | $30.79 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2016 | -0.22x | $-4.46 Million | $20.32 Million | ▼ -158.8% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-2.38 Million | $28.07 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2014 | -0.05x | $-1.17 Million | $23.70 Million | ▼ -270.8% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $214.32K | $7.41 Million | ▲ +103.7% |
| 2012 | -0.77x | $-1.12 Million | $1.45 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2011 | -1.08x | $-1.50 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2010 | -1.67x | $-1.13 Million | $677.86K | ▼ -86.6% |
| 2009 | -0.90x | $-302.23K | $336.86K | ▼ -2459.1% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | $-94.06K | $2.68 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | $987.89K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +575.9% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $158.53K | $2.38 Million | ▲ +129.4% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | $-468.41K | $2.07 Million | ▼ -716.7% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-66.03K | $2.38 Million | ▼ -235.0% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-11.30K | $1.37 Million | ▼ -113.4% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $78.92K | $1.27 Million | ▲ +236.3% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-38.07K | $837.24K | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2000 | -0.28x | $-171.14K | $615.13K | ▼ -105.8% |
| 1999 | 4.82x | $28.07K | $5.82K | — |