Quipt Home Medical Corp (QIPT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Quipt Home Medical Corp (QIPT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.05x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $9.08 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($167.66 Million) in one year. See QIPT financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Quipt Home Medical Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Quipt Home Medical Corp across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Quipt Home Medical Corp generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Quipt Home Medical Corp (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Quipt Home Medical Corp. Check Quipt Home Medical Corp cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.22x | $37.69 Million | $171.19 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2024 | 0.25x | $35.38 Million | $140.06 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 0.27x | $36.98 Million | $136.29 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $26.34 Million | $52.67 Million | ▲ +40.7% |
| 2021 | 0.36x | $17.76 Million | $49.95 Million | ▲ +49.3% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $9.89 Million | $41.54 Million | ▼ -5.1% |
| 2019 | 0.25x | $8.39 Million | $33.44 Million | ▼ -45.6% |
| 2018 | 0.46x | $10.64 Million | $23.09 Million | ▲ +333.9% |
| 2017 | -0.20x | $-6.07 Million | $30.79 Million | ▲ +10.2% |
| 2016 | -0.22x | $-4.46 Million | $20.32 Million | ▼ -158.8% |
| 2015 | -0.08x | $-2.38 Million | $28.07 Million | ▼ -71.7% |
| 2014 | -0.05x | $-1.17 Million | $23.70 Million | ▼ -270.8% |
| 2013 | 0.03x | $214.32K | $7.41 Million | ▲ +103.7% |
| 2012 | -0.77x | $-1.12 Million | $1.45 Million | ▲ +28.6% |
| 2011 | -1.08x | $-1.50 Million | $1.39 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2010 | -1.67x | $-1.13 Million | $677.86K | ▼ -86.6% |
| 2009 | -0.90x | $-302.23K | $336.86K | ▼ -2459.1% |
| 2008 | -0.04x | $-94.06K | $2.68 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2007 | 0.45x | $987.89K | $2.20 Million | ▲ +575.9% |
| 2006 | 0.07x | $158.53K | $2.38 Million | ▲ +129.4% |
| 2005 | -0.23x | $-468.41K | $2.07 Million | ▼ -716.7% |
| 2004 | -0.03x | $-66.03K | $2.38 Million | ▼ -235.0% |
| 2003 | -0.01x | $-11.30K | $1.37 Million | ▼ -113.4% |
| 2002 | 0.06x | $78.92K | $1.27 Million | ▲ +236.3% |
| 2001 | -0.05x | $-38.07K | $837.24K | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2000 | -0.28x | $-171.14K | $615.13K | ▼ -105.8% |
| 1999 | 4.82x | $28.07K | $5.82K | — |