Ribbon Communications Inc (RBBN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Ribbon Communications Inc (RBBN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-22.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($740.60 Million) in one year. See Ribbon Communications Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Ribbon Communications Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Ribbon Communications Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore RBBN year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Ribbon Communications Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Ribbon Communications Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Ribbon Communications Inc (RBBN) market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.07x | $51.40 Million | $763.26 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2024 | 0.07x | $50.24 Million | $757.93 Million | ▲ +168.2% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $17.09 Million | $691.39 Million | ▲ +169.1% |
| 2022 | -0.04x | $-26.36 Million | $737.14 Million | ▼ -253.0% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $19.18 Million | $820.57 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 2020 | 0.12x | $101.56 Million | $860.41 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 2019 | 0.17x | $55.69 Million | $331.65 Million | ▲ +742.0% |
| 2018 | -0.03x | $-9.60 Million | $366.86 Million | ▼ -195.6% |
| 2017 | 0.03x | $8.08 Million | $295.46 Million | ▼ -87.3% |
| 2016 | 0.22x | $19.19 Million | $88.94 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2015 | 0.22x | $19.87 Million | $89.86 Million | ▼ -32.1% |
| 2014 | 0.33x | $30.04 Million | $92.28 Million | ▲ +2.8% |
| 2013 | 0.32x | $33.34 Million | $105.23 Million | ▲ +176.7% |
| 2012 | -0.41x | $-39.31 Million | $95.21 Million | ▼ -524.6% |
| 2011 | -0.07x | $-5.91 Million | $89.41 Million | ▼ -148.9% |
| 2010 | 0.14x | $18.51 Million | $137.00 Million | ▼ -49.4% |
| 2009 | 0.27x | $33.76 Million | $126.50 Million | ▲ +305.9% |
| 2008 | -0.13x | $-16.73 Million | $129.15 Million | ▼ -180.5% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $32.25 Million | $200.46 Million | ▼ -2.1% |
| 2006 | 0.16x | $25.82 Million | $157.07 Million | ▲ +214.4% |
| 2005 | 0.05x | $9.22 Million | $176.39 Million | ▼ -39.3% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $11.10 Million | $128.79 Million | ▲ +121.5% |
| 2003 | 0.04x | $4.83 Million | $123.99 Million | ▲ +120.8% |
| 2002 | -0.19x | $-15.87 Million | $84.80 Million | ▼ -1173.6% |
| 2001 | -0.01x | $-1.21 Million | $82.00 Million | ▲ +95.5% |
| 2000 | -0.33x | $-14.36 Million | $44.13 Million | ▲ +79.9% |
| 1999 | -1.62x | $-15.97 Million | $9.87 Million | — |