RCM Technologies Inc (RCMT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
RCM Technologies Inc (RCMT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.26 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($88.44 Million) in one year. Check RCMT total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
RCM Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for RCM Technologies Inc across 38 annual periods. Also explore RCM Technologies Inc assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for RCM Technologies Inc (1987–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for RCM Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RCMT market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.06x | $6.17 Million | $98.59 Million | ▼ -52.5% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $12.48 Million | $94.69 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2022 | 0.51x | $28.44 Million | $56.00 Million | ▲ +2502.1% |
| 2021 | 0.02x | $915.00K | $46.88 Million | ▼ -96.4% |
| 2020 | 0.55x | $25.20 Million | $46.10 Million | ▲ +829.6% |
| 2019 | -0.07x | $-4.78 Million | $63.77 Million | ▼ -6258.2% |
| 2018 | 0.00x | $-64.00K | $54.31 Million | ▼ -101.2% |
| 2017 | 0.10x | $5.07 Million | $51.25 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 2016 | 0.30x | $11.63 Million | $38.58 Million | ▲ +18.7% |
| 2015 | 0.25x | $12.48 Million | $49.13 Million | ▲ +169.8% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $4.18 Million | $44.41 Million | ▲ +162.4% |
| 2013 | -0.15x | $-3.79 Million | $25.15 Million | ▼ -209.1% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $3.56 Million | $25.78 Million | ▼ -69.0% |
| 2011 | 0.45x | $6.47 Million | $14.52 Million | ▼ -55.2% |
| 2010 | 1.00x | $13.34 Million | $13.40 Million | ▼ -9.5% |
| 2009 | 1.10x | $16.39 Million | $14.91 Million | ▲ +637.3% |
| 2008 | -0.20x | $-4.81 Million | $23.49 Million | ▼ -142.0% |
| 2007 | 0.49x | $8.61 Million | $17.67 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2006 | 0.34x | $5.60 Million | $16.65 Million | ▲ +190.9% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $3.60 Million | $31.08 Million | ▲ +867.8% |
| 2004 | -0.02x | $-424.33K | $28.16 Million | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2003 | 0.09x | $2.89 Million | $32.53 Million | ▼ -91.0% |
| 2002 | 0.99x | $30.51 Million | $30.73 Million | ▲ +58.9% |
| 2001 | 0.62x | $29.91 Million | $47.87 Million | ▲ +68.9% |
| 2000 | 0.37x | $26.71 Million | $72.21 Million | ▲ +703.6% |
| 1999 | -0.06x | $-3.80 Million | $62.00 Million | ▲ +71.0% |
| 1998 | -0.21x | $-2.20 Million | $10.40 Million | ▲ +47.1% |
| 1997 | -0.40x | $-3.80 Million | $9.50 Million | ▼ -72.6% |
| 1996 | -0.23x | $-1.90 Million | $8.20 Million | ▼ -159.0% |
| 1995 | 0.39x | $1.10 Million | $2.80 Million | ▼ -76.9% |
| 1994 | 1.70x | $1.70 Million | $1.00 Million | ▲ +84.2% |
| 1993 | 0.92x | $1.20 Million | $1.30 Million | ▲ +210.8% |
| 1992 | -0.83x | $-1.50 Million | $1.80 Million | ▼ -35.4% |
| 1991 | -0.62x | $-800.00K | $1.30 Million | ▼ -300.0% |
| 1990 | -0.15x | $-200.00K | $1.30 Million | ▲ +62.6% |
| 1989 | -0.41x | $-700.00K | $1.70 Million | ▲ +31.4% |
| 1988 | -0.60x | $-600.00K | $1.00 Million | ▼ -970.0% |
| 1987 | 0.07x | $200.00K | $2.90 Million | — |