Repligen Corporation (RGEN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Repligen Corporation (RGEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $48.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($840.62 Million) in one year. See RGEN FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Repligen Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Repligen Corporation across 35 annual periods. Also explore RGEN net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Repligen Corporation (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Repligen Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see RGEN company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.20x | $175.39 Million | $856.95 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $113.92 Million | $853.21 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $172.08 Million | $620.90 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $119.02 Million | $608.29 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $62.62 Million | $373.74 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $67.22 Million | $340.35 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $32.77 Million | $159.05 Million | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $17.45 Million | $151.92 Million | ▲ +83.5% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $7.52 Million | $120.15 Million | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2015 | 0.64x | $15.05 Million | $23.49 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2014 | 1.11x | $18.40 Million | $16.56 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2013 | 1.76x | $25.93 Million | $14.76 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2012 | 1.04x | $13.44 Million | $12.89 Million | ▲ +356.0% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $2.31 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2010 | 0.62x | $3.23 Million | $5.21 Million | ▲ +232.0% |
| 2009 | -0.47x | $-2.45 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -139.5% |
| 2008 | 1.19x | $6.31 Million | $5.30 Million | ▼ -85.7% |
| 2007 | 8.31x | $38.47 Million | $4.63 Million | ▲ +9594.6% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $405.48K | $4.73 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $415.38K | $3.54 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 2004 | -0.25x | $-795.28K | $3.17 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2003 | -1.72x | $-5.72 Million | $3.32 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2002 | -1.87x | $-5.26 Million | $2.81 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2001 | -2.12x | $-4.75 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2000 | -1.73x | $-4.62 Million | $2.67 Million | ▲ +30.5% |
| 1999 | -2.49x | $-3.13 Million | $1.26 Million | ▼ -148.8% |
| 1998 | -1.00x | $-1.20 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 1997 | -1.75x | $-700.00K | $400.00K | ▲ +83.6% |
| 1996 | -10.67x | $-3.20 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1995 | -11.63x | $-9.30 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -1150.1% |
| 1994 | -0.93x | $-14.60 Million | $15.70 Million | ▲ +52.4% |
| 1993 | -1.95x | $-24.80 Million | $12.70 Million | ▼ -1153.9% |
| 1992 | -0.16x | $-1.90 Million | $12.20 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 1991 | -1.16x | $-8.60 Million | $7.40 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1990 | -2.04x | $-5.70 Million | $2.80 Million | — |