Repligen Corporation (RGEN) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Repligen Corporation (RGEN) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.06x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $48.10 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($840.62 Million) in one year. Explore investment intensity of Repligen Corporation to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Repligen Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Repligen Corporation across 35 annual periods. Also explore Repligen Corporation assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Repligen Corporation (1990–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Repligen Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Repligen Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.20x | $175.39 Million | $856.95 Million | ▲ +53.3% |
| 2023 | 0.13x | $113.92 Million | $853.21 Million | ▼ -51.8% |
| 2022 | 0.28x | $172.08 Million | $620.90 Million | ▲ +41.7% |
| 2021 | 0.20x | $119.02 Million | $608.29 Million | ▲ +16.8% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $62.62 Million | $373.74 Million | ▼ -15.2% |
| 2019 | 0.20x | $67.22 Million | $340.35 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2018 | 0.21x | $32.77 Million | $159.05 Million | ▲ +79.4% |
| 2017 | 0.11x | $17.45 Million | $151.92 Million | ▲ +83.5% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $7.52 Million | $120.15 Million | ▼ -90.2% |
| 2015 | 0.64x | $15.05 Million | $23.49 Million | ▼ -42.3% |
| 2014 | 1.11x | $18.40 Million | $16.56 Million | ▼ -36.8% |
| 2013 | 1.76x | $25.93 Million | $14.76 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 2012 | 1.04x | $13.44 Million | $12.89 Million | ▲ +356.0% |
| 2011 | 0.23x | $2.31 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -63.1% |
| 2010 | 0.62x | $3.23 Million | $5.21 Million | ▲ +232.0% |
| 2009 | -0.47x | $-2.45 Million | $5.21 Million | ▼ -139.5% |
| 2008 | 1.19x | $6.31 Million | $5.30 Million | ▼ -85.7% |
| 2007 | 8.31x | $38.47 Million | $4.63 Million | ▲ +9594.6% |
| 2006 | 0.09x | $405.48K | $4.73 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2005 | 0.12x | $415.38K | $3.54 Million | ▲ +146.7% |
| 2004 | -0.25x | $-795.28K | $3.17 Million | ▲ +85.4% |
| 2003 | -1.72x | $-5.72 Million | $3.32 Million | ▲ +8.0% |
| 2002 | -1.87x | $-5.26 Million | $2.81 Million | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2001 | -2.12x | $-4.75 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -22.3% |
| 2000 | -1.73x | $-4.62 Million | $2.67 Million | ▲ +30.5% |
| 1999 | -2.49x | $-3.13 Million | $1.26 Million | ▼ -148.8% |
| 1998 | -1.00x | $-1.20 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +42.7% |
| 1997 | -1.75x | $-700.00K | $400.00K | ▲ +83.6% |
| 1996 | -10.67x | $-3.20 Million | $300.00K | ▲ +8.2% |
| 1995 | -11.63x | $-9.30 Million | $800.00K | ▼ -1150.1% |
| 1994 | -0.93x | $-14.60 Million | $15.70 Million | ▲ +52.4% |
| 1993 | -1.95x | $-24.80 Million | $12.70 Million | ▼ -1153.9% |
| 1992 | -0.16x | $-1.90 Million | $12.20 Million | ▲ +86.6% |
| 1991 | -1.16x | $-8.60 Million | $7.40 Million | ▲ +42.9% |
| 1990 | -2.04x | $-5.70 Million | $2.80 Million | — |