Relmada Therapeutics Inc (RLMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of December 2025: -1.95x

Relmada Therapeutics Inc (RLMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.95x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-14.60 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities ($7.49 Million) in one year. See Relmada Therapeutics Inc (RLMD) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-1.95x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$-14.60 Million
USD

Total Liabilities

$7.49 Million
USD

Data as of

Dec 2025
Most recent filing

Relmada Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2012–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Relmada Therapeutics Inc across 15 annual periods. Also explore Relmada Therapeutics Inc (RLMD) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Relmada Therapeutics Inc (2012–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Relmada Therapeutics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Relmada Therapeutics Inc worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -6.11x $-45.79 Million $7.49 Million ▼ -21.6%
2024 -5.03x $-51.76 Million $10.30 Million ▼ -18.7%
2023 -4.24x $-51.66 Million $12.19 Million ▲ +49.1%
2022 -8.32x $-103.80 Million $12.47 Million ▼ -36.5%
2021 -6.10x $-91.87 Million $15.06 Million ▼ -176.5%
2020 -2.21x $-27.81 Million $12.60 Million ▼ -26501.5%
2019 -0.01x $-12.09K $1.46 Million ▲ +98.8%
2018 -0.70x $-6.00 Million $8.56 Million ▲ +85.1%
2017 -4.70x $-6.47 Million $1.38 Million ▼ -14.4%
2016 -4.11x $-13.14 Million $3.20 Million ▼ -294.2%
2015 -1.04x $-16.23 Million $15.58 Million ▲ +0.0%
2014 -1.04x $-16.23 Million $15.58 Million ▼ -1149.3%
2014 -0.08x $-2.24 Million $26.87 Million ▼ -18788.6%
2013 0.00x $-11.86K $26.87 Million ▲ +100.0%
2012 -1.08x $-7.57K $7.00K
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.