Rambus Inc (RMBS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rambus Inc (RMBS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.75x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $88.43 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($117.87 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Rambus Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rambus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rambus Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Rambus Inc cash conversion from operations.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rambus Inc (1995–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rambus Inc. Check Rambus Inc (RMBS) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.04x | $230.60 Million | $222.44 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2023 | 0.89x | $195.79 Million | $220.13 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2022 | 0.99x | $230.39 Million | $233.30 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2021 | 0.57x | $209.22 Million | $370.25 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2020 | 0.55x | $185.46 Million | $338.70 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2019 | 0.35x | $128.53 Million | $368.07 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $87.12 Million | $349.04 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $117.44 Million | $319.74 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2016 | 0.40x | $92.54 Million | $230.71 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $76.44 Million | $192.97 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $76.95 Million | $196.66 Million | ▲ +184.4% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $51.34 Million | $373.15 Million | ▲ +309.3% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-17.50 Million | $266.22 Million | ▼ -132.7% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $52.99 Million | $263.86 Million | ▼ -72.0% |
| 2010 | 0.72x | $235.22 Million | $328.39 Million | ▲ +630.3% |
| 2009 | -0.14x | $-40.59 Million | $300.54 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2008 | -0.22x | $-38.47 Million | $175.29 Million | ▼ -838.3% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $6.55 Million | $220.26 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $63.42 Million | $222.33 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $33.13 Million | $190.52 Million | ▼ -83.6% |
| 2004 | 1.06x | $43.70 Million | $41.27 Million | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2003 | 0.44x | $23.41 Million | $53.01 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2002 | 0.89x | $33.24 Million | $37.47 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2001 | 0.66x | $30.57 Million | $46.43 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2000 | 0.61x | $35.21 Million | $57.31 Million | ▲ +614.8% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $4.10 Million | $47.70 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $16.30 Million | $69.20 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 1997 | 0.52x | $31.90 Million | $61.20 Million | ▲ +472.3% |
| 1996 | -0.14x | $-3.50 Million | $25.00 Million | ▼ -382.2% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $1.30 Million | $26.20 Million | — |