Rambus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rambus Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Rambus Inc (RMBS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.75x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $88.43 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($117.87 Million) in one year. Check Rambus Inc (RMBS) cash earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Rambus Inc (1995–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Rambus Inc from 1995 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Rambus Inc across 30 annual periods. Check RMBS cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Rambus Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2024)
Rambus Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rambus Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see RMBS cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.04x | $230.60 Million | $222.44 Million | ▲ +16.6% |
| 2023 | 0.89x | $195.79 Million | $220.13 Million | ▼ -9.9% |
| 2022 | 0.99x | $230.39 Million | $233.30 Million | ▲ +74.8% |
| 2021 | 0.57x | $209.22 Million | $370.25 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2020 | 0.55x | $185.46 Million | $338.70 Million | ▲ +56.8% |
| 2019 | 0.35x | $128.53 Million | $368.07 Million | ▲ +39.9% |
| 2018 | 0.25x | $87.12 Million | $349.04 Million | ▼ -32.0% |
| 2017 | 0.37x | $117.44 Million | $319.74 Million | ▼ -8.4% |
| 2016 | 0.40x | $92.54 Million | $230.71 Million | ▲ +1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.40x | $76.44 Million | $192.97 Million | ▲ +1.2% |
| 2014 | 0.39x | $76.95 Million | $196.66 Million | ▲ +184.4% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $51.34 Million | $373.15 Million | ▲ +309.3% |
| 2012 | -0.07x | $-17.50 Million | $266.22 Million | ▼ -132.7% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $52.99 Million | $263.86 Million | ▼ -72.0% |
| 2010 | 0.72x | $235.22 Million | $328.39 Million | ▲ +630.3% |
| 2009 | -0.14x | $-40.59 Million | $300.54 Million | ▲ +38.5% |
| 2008 | -0.22x | $-38.47 Million | $175.29 Million | ▼ -838.3% |
| 2007 | 0.03x | $6.55 Million | $220.26 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2006 | 0.29x | $63.42 Million | $222.33 Million | ▲ +64.0% |
| 2005 | 0.17x | $33.13 Million | $190.52 Million | ▼ -83.6% |
| 2004 | 1.06x | $43.70 Million | $41.27 Million | ▲ +139.7% |
| 2003 | 0.44x | $23.41 Million | $53.01 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2002 | 0.89x | $33.24 Million | $37.47 Million | ▲ +34.8% |
| 2001 | 0.66x | $30.57 Million | $46.43 Million | ▲ +7.2% |
| 2000 | 0.61x | $35.21 Million | $57.31 Million | ▲ +614.8% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $4.10 Million | $47.70 Million | ▼ -63.5% |
| 1998 | 0.24x | $16.30 Million | $69.20 Million | ▼ -54.8% |
| 1997 | 0.52x | $31.90 Million | $61.20 Million | ▲ +472.3% |
| 1996 | -0.14x | $-3.50 Million | $25.00 Million | ▼ -382.2% |
| 1995 | 0.05x | $1.30 Million | $26.20 Million | — |