Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.24 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.72 Million) in one year. See financial flexibility index of Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory across 34 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory. Check Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.46x | $-6.59 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | $-2.44 Million | $9.94 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | $-2.10 Million | $7.62 Million | ▼ -172.2% |
| 2022 | 0.38x | $2.86 Million | $7.48 Million | ▲ +3294.6% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $67.35K | $5.98 Million | ▼ -97.8% |
| 2020 | 0.52x | $4.40 Million | $8.46 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2019 | 0.69x | $4.02 Million | $5.83 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2018 | 0.51x | $4.76 Million | $9.38 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2017 | 0.50x | $5.32 Million | $10.59 Million | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2016 | 0.57x | $6.79 Million | $11.84 Million | ▲ +40.6% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | $5.87 Million | $14.40 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $5.66 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2013 | 0.99x | $6.36 Million | $6.44 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2012 | 1.13x | $6.15 Million | $5.43 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2011 | 0.79x | $3.80 Million | $4.78 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2010 | 1.32x | $5.54 Million | $4.19 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2009 | 0.97x | $3.48 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2008 | 1.25x | $5.63 Million | $4.49 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2007 | 1.21x | $4.78 Million | $3.94 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2006 | 1.47x | $5.27 Million | $3.57 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2005 | 0.77x | $4.10 Million | $5.35 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $5.26 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | $2.97 Million | $6.19 Million | ▲ +202.5% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $1.27 Million | $7.97 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2001 | 0.31x | $2.48 Million | $7.98 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2000 | 0.44x | $3.51 Million | $8.01 Million | ▲ +394.9% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $900.00K | $10.15 Million | ▼ -64.9% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $2.50 Million | $9.90 Million | ▲ +377.8% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-800.00K | $8.80 Million | ▼ -152.5% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $900.00K | $5.20 Million | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1995 | 0.40x | $1.70 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 1994 | 0.74x | $1.40 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 1993 | 0.44x | $700.00K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +975.0% |
| 1992 | -0.05x | $-100.00K | $2.00 Million | — |