Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.08x as of November 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.24 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($14.72 Million) in one year. See Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (RMCF) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory across 34 annual periods. Also explore Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.46x | $-6.59 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2024 | -0.24x | $-2.44 Million | $9.94 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 2023 | -0.28x | $-2.10 Million | $7.62 Million | ▼ -172.2% |
| 2022 | 0.38x | $2.86 Million | $7.48 Million | ▲ +3294.6% |
| 2021 | 0.01x | $67.35K | $5.98 Million | ▼ -97.8% |
| 2020 | 0.52x | $4.40 Million | $8.46 Million | ▼ -24.5% |
| 2019 | 0.69x | $4.02 Million | $5.83 Million | ▲ +35.8% |
| 2018 | 0.51x | $4.76 Million | $9.38 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2017 | 0.50x | $5.32 Million | $10.59 Million | ▼ -12.4% |
| 2016 | 0.57x | $6.79 Million | $11.84 Million | ▲ +40.6% |
| 2015 | 0.41x | $5.87 Million | $14.40 Million | ▲ +10.1% |
| 2014 | 0.37x | $5.66 Million | $15.30 Million | ▼ -62.5% |
| 2013 | 0.99x | $6.36 Million | $6.44 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2012 | 1.13x | $6.15 Million | $5.43 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2011 | 0.79x | $3.80 Million | $4.78 Million | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2010 | 1.32x | $5.54 Million | $4.19 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2009 | 0.97x | $3.48 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2008 | 1.25x | $5.63 Million | $4.49 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2007 | 1.21x | $4.78 Million | $3.94 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 2006 | 1.47x | $5.27 Million | $3.57 Million | ▲ +92.4% |
| 2005 | 0.77x | $4.10 Million | $5.35 Million | ▼ -7.1% |
| 2004 | 0.82x | $5.26 Million | $6.38 Million | ▲ +71.8% |
| 2003 | 0.48x | $2.97 Million | $6.19 Million | ▲ +202.5% |
| 2002 | 0.16x | $1.27 Million | $7.97 Million | ▼ -49.0% |
| 2001 | 0.31x | $2.48 Million | $7.98 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2000 | 0.44x | $3.51 Million | $8.01 Million | ▲ +394.9% |
| 1999 | 0.09x | $900.00K | $10.15 Million | ▼ -64.9% |
| 1998 | 0.25x | $2.50 Million | $9.90 Million | ▲ +377.8% |
| 1997 | -0.09x | $-800.00K | $8.80 Million | ▼ -152.5% |
| 1996 | 0.17x | $900.00K | $5.20 Million | ▼ -56.2% |
| 1995 | 0.40x | $1.70 Million | $4.30 Million | ▼ -46.3% |
| 1994 | 0.74x | $1.40 Million | $1.90 Million | ▲ +68.4% |
| 1993 | 0.44x | $700.00K | $1.60 Million | ▲ +975.0% |
| 1992 | -0.05x | $-100.00K | $2.00 Million | — |