Global Self Storage Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Global Self Storage Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Global Self Storage Inc (SELF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.21 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($17.32 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Global Self Storage Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Global Self Storage Inc (2001–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Global Self Storage Inc from 2001 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Global Self Storage Inc across 25 annual periods. Check Global Self Storage Inc (SELF) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Global Self Storage Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2001–2025)
Global Self Storage Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2001 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Global Self Storage Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Global Self Storage Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.26x | $4.47 Million | $17.54 Million | ▲ +6.5% |
| 2024 | 0.24x | $4.33 Million | $18.08 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2023 | 0.24x | $4.52 Million | $18.63 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2022 | 0.25x | $4.80 Million | $19.04 Million | ▲ +34.4% |
| 2021 | 0.19x | $3.64 Million | $19.43 Million | ▲ +133.8% |
| 2020 | 0.08x | $2.00 Million | $24.91 Million | ▲ +20.2% |
| 2019 | 0.07x | $1.71 Million | $25.60 Million | ▼ -37.5% |
| 2018 | 0.11x | $2.28 Million | $21.38 Million | ▲ +21.9% |
| 2017 | 0.09x | $1.87 Million | $21.37 Million | ▲ +41.1% |
| 2016 | 0.06x | $1.31 Million | $21.10 Million | ▼ -98.9% |
| 2015 | 5.40x | $1.10 Million | $203.67K | ▼ -75.1% |
| 2014 | 21.71x | $3.68 Million | $169.30K | ▲ +2696.4% |
| 2013 | 0.78x | $1.46 Million | $1.88 Million | ▼ -86.1% |
| 2012 | 5.60x | $4.54 Million | $810.00K | ▲ +163.5% |
| 2011 | -8.83x | $-1.06 Million | $120.00K | ▼ -551.1% |
| 2010 | 1.96x | $1.88 Million | $960.00K | ▼ -48.2% |
| 2009 | 3.78x | $3.74 Million | $990.00K | ▲ +1088.8% |
| 2008 | -0.38x | $-1.15 Million | $3.01 Million | ▼ -101.3% |
| 2007 | 30.00x | $3.30 Million | $110.00K | ▲ +11.6% |
| 2006 | 26.89x | $2.42 Million | $90.00K | ▲ +261.7% |
| 2005 | -16.63x | $-2.66 Million | $160.00K | ▼ -189.9% |
| 2004 | 18.50x | $2.96 Million | $160.00K | ▼ -51.5% |
| 2003 | 38.14x | $2.67 Million | $70.00K | ▲ +581.1% |
| 2002 | 5.60x | $560.00K | $100.00K | ▼ -65.0% |
| 2001 | 16.00x | $1.60 Million | $100.00K | — |