SG Blocks Inc (SGBX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SG Blocks Inc (SGBX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-638.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($29.17 Million) in one year. Explore SGBX long-term investments to assets to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SG Blocks Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SG Blocks Inc across 29 annual periods. Also explore SG Blocks Inc assets under control for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SG Blocks Inc (1996–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SG Blocks Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SG Blocks Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.59x | $-10.90 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -93.9% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-7.14 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2022 | -0.46x | $-5.63 Million | $12.12 Million | ▼ -826.1% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-662.76K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2020 | -0.34x | $-2.89 Million | $8.44 Million | ▲ +72.4% |
| 2019 | -1.24x | $-2.82 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2018 | -0.87x | $-3.45 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -168.2% |
| 2017 | -0.33x | $-1.24 Million | $3.82 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2016 | -0.28x | $-1.87 Million | $6.64 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2015 | -0.18x | $-1.19 Million | $6.64 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2014 | -0.23x | $-1.05 Million | $4.68 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2013 | -0.35x | $-1.08 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2012 | -0.66x | $-1.27 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2011 | -1.59x | $-1.59 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -139.8% |
| 2010 | -0.66x | $-33.42K | $50.51K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2009 | -0.98x | $-33.19K | $33.72K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2008 | -2.63x | $-30.59K | $11.65K | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2007 | -1.76x | $-11.73K | $6.65K | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2006 | -3.93x | $-29.85K | $7.60K | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2005 | -4.47x | $-31.29K | $7.00K | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2004 | -6.30x | $-46.28K | $7.35K | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2003 | -3.75x | $-50.75K | $13.53K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2002 | -3.59x | $-50.60K | $14.11K | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2001 | -2.59x | $-87.50K | $33.83K | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2000 | -1.47x | $-106.99K | $72.63K | ▲ +85.0% |
| 1999 | -9.82x | $-1.39 Million | $141.04K | ▲ +27.4% |
| 1998 | -13.53x | $-2.36 Million | $174.73K | ▼ -196.9% |
| 1997 | -4.56x | $-1.06 Million | $232.82K | ▼ -225.5% |
| 1996 | -1.40x | $-700.00K | $500.00K | — |