SG Blocks Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SG Blocks Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. SG Blocks Inc (SGBX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.02x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-638.45K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($29.17 Million) in one year. Check SG Blocks Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of SG Blocks Inc (1996–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of SG Blocks Inc from 1996 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for SG Blocks Inc across 29 annual periods. Check how aggressively does SG Blocks Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
SG Blocks Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2024)
SG Blocks Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SG Blocks Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SGBX cash generation efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | -0.59x | $-10.90 Million | $18.53 Million | ▼ -93.9% |
| 2023 | -0.30x | $-7.14 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +34.7% |
| 2022 | -0.46x | $-5.63 Million | $12.12 Million | ▼ -826.1% |
| 2021 | -0.05x | $-662.76K | $13.21 Million | ▲ +85.3% |
| 2020 | -0.34x | $-2.89 Million | $8.44 Million | ▲ +72.4% |
| 2019 | -1.24x | $-2.82 Million | $2.27 Million | ▼ -42.0% |
| 2018 | -0.87x | $-3.45 Million | $3.96 Million | ▼ -168.2% |
| 2017 | -0.33x | $-1.24 Million | $3.82 Million | ▼ -15.6% |
| 2016 | -0.28x | $-1.87 Million | $6.64 Million | ▼ -57.0% |
| 2015 | -0.18x | $-1.19 Million | $6.64 Million | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2014 | -0.23x | $-1.05 Million | $4.68 Million | ▲ +35.4% |
| 2013 | -0.35x | $-1.08 Million | $3.09 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2012 | -0.66x | $-1.27 Million | $1.91 Million | ▲ +58.2% |
| 2011 | -1.59x | $-1.59 Million | $1.00 Million | ▼ -139.8% |
| 2010 | -0.66x | $-33.42K | $50.51K | ▲ +32.8% |
| 2009 | -0.98x | $-33.19K | $33.72K | ▲ +62.5% |
| 2008 | -2.63x | $-30.59K | $11.65K | ▼ -48.9% |
| 2007 | -1.76x | $-11.73K | $6.65K | ▲ +55.1% |
| 2006 | -3.93x | $-29.85K | $7.60K | ▲ +12.1% |
| 2005 | -4.47x | $-31.29K | $7.00K | ▲ +29.0% |
| 2004 | -6.30x | $-46.28K | $7.35K | ▼ -67.8% |
| 2003 | -3.75x | $-50.75K | $13.53K | ▼ -4.6% |
| 2002 | -3.59x | $-50.60K | $14.11K | ▼ -38.7% |
| 2001 | -2.59x | $-87.50K | $33.83K | ▼ -75.6% |
| 2000 | -1.47x | $-106.99K | $72.63K | ▲ +85.0% |
| 1999 | -9.82x | $-1.39 Million | $141.04K | ▲ +27.4% |
| 1998 | -13.53x | $-2.36 Million | $174.73K | ▼ -196.9% |
| 1997 | -4.56x | $-1.06 Million | $232.82K | ▼ -225.5% |
| 1996 | -1.40x | $-700.00K | $500.00K | — |