Steven Madden Ltd (SHOO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Steven Madden Ltd (SHOO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.05x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-55.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.01 Billion) in one year. See free cash flow generation of Steven Madden Ltd to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Steven Madden Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1992–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Steven Madden Ltd across 34 annual periods. Also explore SHOO year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Steven Madden Ltd (1992–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Steven Madden Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Steven Madden Ltd (SHOO) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.16x | $162.20 Million | $1.01 Billion | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2024 | 0.37x | $198.10 Million | $535.77 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 2023 | 0.46x | $229.24 Million | $499.91 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2022 | 0.65x | $267.88 Million | $414.12 Million | ▲ +117.0% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | $159.46 Million | $535.00 Million | ▲ +134.2% |
| 2020 | 0.13x | $44.21 Million | $347.39 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 2019 | 0.53x | $233.78 Million | $437.42 Million | ▼ -10.7% |
| 2018 | 0.60x | $154.38 Million | $257.89 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2017 | 0.64x | $157.94 Million | $248.23 Million | ▼ -3.9% |
| 2016 | 0.66x | $153.60 Million | $231.97 Million | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2015 | 0.57x | $134.72 Million | $235.72 Million | ▼ -9.1% |
| 2014 | 0.63x | $151.97 Million | $241.71 Million | ▼ -18.5% |
| 2013 | 0.77x | $155.45 Million | $201.40 Million | ▼ -4.9% |
| 2012 | 0.81x | $144.21 Million | $177.64 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2011 | 0.45x | $74.97 Million | $165.03 Million | ▼ -52.7% |
| 2010 | 0.96x | $86.87 Million | $90.40 Million | ▼ -11.8% |
| 2009 | 1.09x | $64.34 Million | $59.07 Million | ▲ +104.5% |
| 2008 | 0.53x | $41.78 Million | $78.45 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2007 | 1.17x | $59.91 Million | $51.19 Million | ▲ +6.4% |
| 2006 | 1.10x | $43.41 Million | $39.47 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 2005 | 1.44x | $42.74 Million | $29.66 Million | ▲ +143.8% |
| 2004 | 0.59x | $12.86 Million | $21.77 Million | ▲ +39.7% |
| 2003 | 0.42x | $7.90 Million | $18.68 Million | ▼ -70.8% |
| 2002 | 1.45x | $29.59 Million | $20.43 Million | ▲ +200.8% |
| 2001 | 0.48x | $9.39 Million | $19.50 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2000 | 0.58x | $8.75 Million | $15.17 Million | ▼ -60.5% |
| 1999 | 1.46x | $22.90 Million | $15.70 Million | ▲ +417.1% |
| 1998 | 0.28x | $1.10 Million | $3.90 Million | ▼ -58.9% |
| 1997 | 0.69x | $2.40 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +275.2% |
| 1996 | -0.39x | $-900.00K | $2.30 Million | ▲ +48.8% |
| 1995 | -0.76x | $-1.30 Million | $1.70 Million | ▲ +82.6% |
| 1994 | -4.40x | $-2.20 Million | $500.00K | ▼ -2100.0% |
| 1993 | -0.20x | $-200.00K | $1.00 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1992 | -0.20x | $-200.00K | $1.00 Million | — |