Shyft Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Shyft Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Shyft Group Inc (SHYF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($333.76 Million) in one year. Check earnings quality score of Shyft Group Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Shyft Group Inc (1985–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Shyft Group Inc from 1985 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Shyft Group Inc across 39 annual periods. Check SHYF cash flow reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Shyft Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1985–2024)
Shyft Group Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1985 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shyft Group Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Shyft Group Inc generate cash.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.09x | $30.06 Million | $320.43 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $56.24 Million | $277.88 Million | ▲ +434.9% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-18.84 Million | $311.79 Million | ▼ -114.8% |
| 2021 | 0.41x | $74.01 Million | $181.01 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | $64.33 Million | $158.89 Million | ▲ +230.2% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $34.18 Million | $278.79 Million | ▲ +156.2% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $8.03 Million | $167.70 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $22.02 Million | $132.90 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $23.45 Million | $90.34 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $12.90 Million | $82.18 Million | ▲ +69.4% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $6.51 Million | $70.19 Million | ▼ -40.9% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $13.05 Million | $83.20 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $6.37 Million | $66.42 Million | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $30.14 Million | $65.77 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $33.74 Million | $58.77 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2009 | 0.34x | $38.12 Million | $112.76 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2008 | 0.62x | $56.45 Million | $90.50 Million | ▲ +1865.4% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-6.69 Million | $189.45 Million | ▲ +85.0% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | $-20.55 Million | $87.47 Million | ▼ -347.8% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $4.80 Million | $50.61 Million | ▲ +607.5% |
| 2004 | -0.02x | $-736.18K | $39.40 Million | ▼ -104.0% |
| 2003 | 0.47x | $14.29 Million | $30.26 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $15.70 Million | $31.88 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2001 | 0.49x | $20.06 Million | $40.70 Million | ▲ +384.1% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $6.89 Million | $67.65 Million | ▲ +131.3% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $3.50 Million | $79.50 Million | ▲ +132.3% |
| 1998 | -0.14x | $-11.00 Million | $80.80 Million | ▼ -130.4% |
| 1997 | 0.45x | $15.10 Million | $33.70 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $4.70 Million | $18.30 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 1995 | 0.31x | $4.70 Million | $15.40 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1994 | 0.40x | $7.80 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +900.0% |
| 1993 | 0.04x | $700.00K | $17.50 Million | ▼ -90.2% |
| 1992 | 0.41x | $5.60 Million | $13.70 Million | ▲ +489.9% |
| 1991 | -0.10x | $-1.30 Million | $12.40 Million | ▼ -414.5% |
| 1990 | 0.03x | $500.00K | $15.00 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 1989 | 0.14x | $1.50 Million | $10.70 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 1988 | 0.20x | $2.30 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 1986 | 0.18x | $700.00K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1985 | 0.17x | $300.00K | $1.80 Million | — |