Shyft Group Inc (SHYF) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Shyft Group Inc (SHYF) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-4.52 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($333.76 Million) in one year. See SHYF FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Shyft Group Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1985–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Shyft Group Inc across 39 annual periods. Also explore Shyft Group Inc net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Shyft Group Inc (1985–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shyft Group Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Shyft Group Inc (SHYF) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.09x | $30.06 Million | $320.43 Million | ▼ -53.7% |
| 2023 | 0.20x | $56.24 Million | $277.88 Million | ▲ +434.9% |
| 2022 | -0.06x | $-18.84 Million | $311.79 Million | ▼ -114.8% |
| 2021 | 0.41x | $74.01 Million | $181.01 Million | ▲ +1.0% |
| 2020 | 0.40x | $64.33 Million | $158.89 Million | ▲ +230.2% |
| 2019 | 0.12x | $34.18 Million | $278.79 Million | ▲ +156.2% |
| 2018 | 0.05x | $8.03 Million | $167.70 Million | ▼ -71.1% |
| 2017 | 0.17x | $22.02 Million | $132.90 Million | ▼ -36.2% |
| 2016 | 0.26x | $23.45 Million | $90.34 Million | ▲ +65.4% |
| 2015 | 0.16x | $12.90 Million | $82.18 Million | ▲ +69.4% |
| 2014 | 0.09x | $6.51 Million | $70.19 Million | ▼ -40.9% |
| 2013 | 0.16x | $13.05 Million | $83.20 Million | ▲ +63.6% |
| 2012 | 0.10x | $6.37 Million | $66.42 Million | ▼ -79.1% |
| 2011 | 0.46x | $30.14 Million | $65.77 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $33.74 Million | $58.77 Million | ▲ +69.8% |
| 2009 | 0.34x | $38.12 Million | $112.76 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2008 | 0.62x | $56.45 Million | $90.50 Million | ▲ +1865.4% |
| 2007 | -0.04x | $-6.69 Million | $189.45 Million | ▲ +85.0% |
| 2006 | -0.23x | $-20.55 Million | $87.47 Million | ▼ -347.8% |
| 2005 | 0.09x | $4.80 Million | $50.61 Million | ▲ +607.5% |
| 2004 | -0.02x | $-736.18K | $39.40 Million | ▼ -104.0% |
| 2003 | 0.47x | $14.29 Million | $30.26 Million | ▼ -4.1% |
| 2002 | 0.49x | $15.70 Million | $31.88 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2001 | 0.49x | $20.06 Million | $40.70 Million | ▲ +384.1% |
| 2000 | 0.10x | $6.89 Million | $67.65 Million | ▲ +131.3% |
| 1999 | 0.04x | $3.50 Million | $79.50 Million | ▲ +132.3% |
| 1998 | -0.14x | $-11.00 Million | $80.80 Million | ▼ -130.4% |
| 1997 | 0.45x | $15.10 Million | $33.70 Million | ▲ +74.5% |
| 1996 | 0.26x | $4.70 Million | $18.30 Million | ▼ -15.8% |
| 1995 | 0.31x | $4.70 Million | $15.40 Million | ▼ -23.7% |
| 1994 | 0.40x | $7.80 Million | $19.50 Million | ▲ +900.0% |
| 1993 | 0.04x | $700.00K | $17.50 Million | ▼ -90.2% |
| 1992 | 0.41x | $5.60 Million | $13.70 Million | ▲ +489.9% |
| 1991 | -0.10x | $-1.30 Million | $12.40 Million | ▼ -414.5% |
| 1990 | 0.03x | $500.00K | $15.00 Million | ▼ -76.2% |
| 1989 | 0.14x | $1.50 Million | $10.70 Million | ▼ -30.5% |
| 1988 | 0.20x | $2.30 Million | $11.40 Million | ▲ +9.5% |
| 1986 | 0.18x | $700.00K | $3.80 Million | ▲ +10.5% |
| 1985 | 0.17x | $300.00K | $1.80 Million | — |