SIGA Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SIGA Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. SIGA Technologies Inc (SIGA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-8.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($67.77 Trillion) in one year. Check SIGA Technologies Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of SIGA Technologies Inc (1996–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of SIGA Technologies Inc from 1996 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for SIGA Technologies Inc across 30 annual periods. Check SIGA Technologies Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
SIGA Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1996–2025)
SIGA Technologies Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1996 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SIGA Technologies Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SIGA Technologies Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.11x | $43.47 Million | $20.65 Million | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2024 | 1.71x | $48.76 Million | $28.53 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2023 | 1.65x | $94.80 Million | $57.49 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2022 | 1.67x | $41.61 Million | $24.88 Million | ▲ +488.1% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $11.49 Million | $40.41 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2020 | 3.57x | $71.52 Million | $20.04 Million | ▲ +2076.0% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-18.20 Million | $100.78 Million | ▼ -126.4% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $68.87 Million | $100.53 Million | ▲ +4028.4% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | $-8.16 Million | $467.81 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | $-115.59 Million | $448.40 Million | ▼ -1191.0% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $11.11 Million | $470.16 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $14.18 Million | $412.89 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $58.44 Million | $176.85 Million | ▲ +225.6% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | $-20.22 Million | $76.89 Million | ▼ -150.1% |
| 2011 | 0.53x | $25.57 Million | $48.69 Million | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2010 | -0.72x | $-10.83 Million | $14.96 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2009 | -0.55x | $-8.47 Million | $15.43 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2008 | -0.99x | $-7.20 Million | $7.24 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2007 | -1.02x | $-5.45 Million | $5.36 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2006 | -0.66x | $-4.44 Million | $6.75 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2005 | -0.48x | $-1.39 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2004 | -3.15x | $-4.89 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2003 | -9.73x | $-5.33 Million | $548.23K | ▼ -141.3% |
| 2002 | -4.03x | $-2.65 Million | $656.91K | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2001 | -4.42x | $-2.94 Million | $666.20K | ▼ -156.5% |
| 2000 | -1.72x | $-3.94 Million | $2.29 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 1999 | -2.58x | $-3.10 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 1998 | -3.13x | $-4.70 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 1997 | -3.20x | $-1.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 1996 | -10.50x | $-2.10 Million | $200.00K | — |