SIGA Technologies Inc (SIGA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SIGA Technologies Inc (SIGA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-8.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($67.77 Trillion) in one year. See financial flexibility index of SIGA Technologies Inc to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SIGA Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SIGA Technologies Inc across 30 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SIGA Technologies Inc (SIGA) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SIGA Technologies Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SIGA Technologies Inc. Check SIGA Technologies Inc cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.11x | $43.47 Million | $20.65 Million | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2024 | 1.71x | $48.76 Million | $28.53 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2023 | 1.65x | $94.80 Million | $57.49 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2022 | 1.67x | $41.61 Million | $24.88 Million | ▲ +488.1% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $11.49 Million | $40.41 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2020 | 3.57x | $71.52 Million | $20.04 Million | ▲ +2076.0% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-18.20 Million | $100.78 Million | ▼ -126.4% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $68.87 Million | $100.53 Million | ▲ +4028.4% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | $-8.16 Million | $467.81 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | $-115.59 Million | $448.40 Million | ▼ -1191.0% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $11.11 Million | $470.16 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $14.18 Million | $412.89 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $58.44 Million | $176.85 Million | ▲ +225.6% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | $-20.22 Million | $76.89 Million | ▼ -150.1% |
| 2011 | 0.53x | $25.57 Million | $48.69 Million | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2010 | -0.72x | $-10.83 Million | $14.96 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2009 | -0.55x | $-8.47 Million | $15.43 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2008 | -0.99x | $-7.20 Million | $7.24 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2007 | -1.02x | $-5.45 Million | $5.36 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2006 | -0.66x | $-4.44 Million | $6.75 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2005 | -0.48x | $-1.39 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2004 | -3.15x | $-4.89 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2003 | -9.73x | $-5.33 Million | $548.23K | ▼ -141.3% |
| 2002 | -4.03x | $-2.65 Million | $656.91K | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2001 | -4.42x | $-2.94 Million | $666.20K | ▼ -156.5% |
| 2000 | -1.72x | $-3.94 Million | $2.29 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 1999 | -2.58x | $-3.10 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 1998 | -3.13x | $-4.70 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 1997 | -3.20x | $-1.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 1996 | -10.50x | $-2.10 Million | $200.00K | — |