SIGA Technologies Inc (SIGA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SIGA Technologies Inc (SIGA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-8.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($67.77 Trillion) in one year. See SIGA Technologies Inc free cash flow generation to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SIGA Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SIGA Technologies Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of SIGA Technologies Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SIGA Technologies Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SIGA Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SIGA Technologies Inc market cap and net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.11x | $43.47 Million | $20.65 Million | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2024 | 1.71x | $48.76 Million | $28.53 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2023 | 1.65x | $94.80 Million | $57.49 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2022 | 1.67x | $41.61 Million | $24.88 Million | ▲ +488.1% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $11.49 Million | $40.41 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2020 | 3.57x | $71.52 Million | $20.04 Million | ▲ +2076.0% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-18.20 Million | $100.78 Million | ▼ -126.4% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $68.87 Million | $100.53 Million | ▲ +4028.4% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | $-8.16 Million | $467.81 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | $-115.59 Million | $448.40 Million | ▼ -1191.0% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $11.11 Million | $470.16 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $14.18 Million | $412.89 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $58.44 Million | $176.85 Million | ▲ +225.6% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | $-20.22 Million | $76.89 Million | ▼ -150.1% |
| 2011 | 0.53x | $25.57 Million | $48.69 Million | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2010 | -0.72x | $-10.83 Million | $14.96 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2009 | -0.55x | $-8.47 Million | $15.43 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2008 | -0.99x | $-7.20 Million | $7.24 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2007 | -1.02x | $-5.45 Million | $5.36 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2006 | -0.66x | $-4.44 Million | $6.75 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2005 | -0.48x | $-1.39 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2004 | -3.15x | $-4.89 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2003 | -9.73x | $-5.33 Million | $548.23K | ▼ -141.3% |
| 2002 | -4.03x | $-2.65 Million | $656.91K | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2001 | -4.42x | $-2.94 Million | $666.20K | ▼ -156.5% |
| 2000 | -1.72x | $-3.94 Million | $2.29 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 1999 | -2.58x | $-3.10 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 1998 | -3.13x | $-4.70 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 1997 | -3.20x | $-1.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 1996 | -10.50x | $-2.10 Million | $200.00K | — |