SIGA Technologies Inc (SIGA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SIGA Technologies Inc (SIGA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.00x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-8.66 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($67.77 Trillion) in one year. Check SIGA Technologies Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
SIGA Technologies Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1996–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for SIGA Technologies Inc across 30 annual periods. Also explore SIGA Technologies Inc balance sheet assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for SIGA Technologies Inc (1996–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SIGA Technologies Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SIGA Technologies Inc stock valuation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2.11x | $43.47 Million | $20.65 Million | ▲ +23.2% |
| 2024 | 1.71x | $48.76 Million | $28.53 Million | ▲ +3.6% |
| 2023 | 1.65x | $94.80 Million | $57.49 Million | ▼ -1.4% |
| 2022 | 1.67x | $41.61 Million | $24.88 Million | ▲ +488.1% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $11.49 Million | $40.41 Million | ▼ -92.0% |
| 2020 | 3.57x | $71.52 Million | $20.04 Million | ▲ +2076.0% |
| 2019 | -0.18x | $-18.20 Million | $100.78 Million | ▼ -126.4% |
| 2018 | 0.69x | $68.87 Million | $100.53 Million | ▲ +4028.4% |
| 2017 | -0.02x | $-8.16 Million | $467.81 Million | ▲ +93.2% |
| 2016 | -0.26x | $-115.59 Million | $448.40 Million | ▼ -1191.0% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $11.11 Million | $470.16 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2014 | 0.03x | $14.18 Million | $412.89 Million | ▼ -89.6% |
| 2013 | 0.33x | $58.44 Million | $176.85 Million | ▲ +225.6% |
| 2012 | -0.26x | $-20.22 Million | $76.89 Million | ▼ -150.1% |
| 2011 | 0.53x | $25.57 Million | $48.69 Million | ▲ +172.6% |
| 2010 | -0.72x | $-10.83 Million | $14.96 Million | ▼ -31.8% |
| 2009 | -0.55x | $-8.47 Million | $15.43 Million | ▲ +44.7% |
| 2008 | -0.99x | $-7.20 Million | $7.24 Million | ▲ +2.2% |
| 2007 | -1.02x | $-5.45 Million | $5.36 Million | ▼ -54.5% |
| 2006 | -0.66x | $-4.44 Million | $6.75 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2005 | -0.48x | $-1.39 Million | $2.87 Million | ▲ +84.6% |
| 2004 | -3.15x | $-4.89 Million | $1.55 Million | ▲ +67.6% |
| 2003 | -9.73x | $-5.33 Million | $548.23K | ▼ -141.3% |
| 2002 | -4.03x | $-2.65 Million | $656.91K | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2001 | -4.42x | $-2.94 Million | $666.20K | ▼ -156.5% |
| 2000 | -1.72x | $-3.94 Million | $2.29 Million | ▲ +33.3% |
| 1999 | -2.58x | $-3.10 Million | $1.20 Million | ▲ +17.6% |
| 1998 | -3.13x | $-4.70 Million | $1.50 Million | ▲ +2.1% |
| 1997 | -3.20x | $-1.60 Million | $500.00K | ▲ +69.5% |
| 1996 | -10.50x | $-2.10 Million | $200.00K | — |