Shineco Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of March 2025: -0.01x

Shineco Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Shineco Inc (SISI) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of March 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-430.34K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($59.44 Million) in one year. Check Shineco Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

-0.01x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

$-430.34K
USD

Total Liabilities

$59.44 Million
USD

Data as of

Mar 2025
Most recent filing

Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Shineco Inc (2005–2024)

Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Shineco Inc from 2005 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Shineco Inc across 15 annual periods. Check SISI total capital reinvestment ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.

Shineco Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2005–2024)

Shineco Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2005 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Shineco Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Shineco Inc.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (USD) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2024 -0.08x $-3.93 Million $47.60 Million ▲ +59.2%
2023 -0.20x $-5.39 Million $26.62 Million ▼ -8.2%
2022 -0.19x $-5.71 Million $30.51 Million ▲ +79.6%
2021 -0.92x $-14.65 Million $15.94 Million ▼ -148.2%
2020 -0.37x $-4.66 Million $12.58 Million ▼ -217.5%
2019 0.31x $3.50 Million $11.11 Million ▼ -67.3%
2018 0.96x $9.85 Million $10.23 Million ▲ +276.5%
2017 -0.55x $-2.74 Million $5.03 Million ▼ -126.8%
2016 2.03x $13.29 Million $6.54 Million ▲ +354.9%
2015 0.45x $2.65 Million $5.92 Million ▼ -82.3%
2014 2.52x $9.48 Million $3.76 Million ▲ +491.3%
2013 -0.64x $-5.09 Million $7.89 Million ▼ -259.9%
2007 -0.18x $-493.86K $2.76 Million ▲ +0.0%
2006 -0.18x $-493.86K $2.76 Million ▼ -105.3%
2005 -0.09x $-240.57K $2.76 Million —
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.