Silicon Laboratories Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Silicon Laboratories Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Silicon Laboratories Inc (SLAB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.09x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-14.51 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($158.25 Million) in one year. Check cash flow reinvestment rate of Silicon Laboratories Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Silicon Laboratories Inc (1999–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Silicon Laboratories Inc from 1999 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Silicon Laboratories Inc across 27 annual periods. Check Silicon Laboratories Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Silicon Laboratories Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1999–2025)
Silicon Laboratories Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1999 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Silicon Laboratories Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Silicon Laboratories Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.55x | $95.71 Million | $174.90 Million | ▲ +661.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-13.91 Million | $142.65 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2023 | -0.13x | $-30.35 Million | $234.37 Million | ▼ -237.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $71.81 Million | $764.42 Million | ▲ +169.8% |
| 2021 | -0.13x | $-100.44 Million | $745.87 Million | ▼ -178.7% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $135.72 Million | $793.65 Million | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $166.52 Million | $559.80 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $173.54 Million | $557.06 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $189.52 Million | $582.07 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $128.91 Million | $254.89 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | $105.45 Million | $250.35 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2014 | 0.48x | $137.44 Million | $284.50 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2013 | 0.48x | $120.15 Million | $252.59 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $97.05 Million | $221.99 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2011 | 0.83x | $88.74 Million | $107.05 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2010 | 1.15x | $117.94 Million | $102.23 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2009 | 1.07x | $120.94 Million | $113.04 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $119.68 Million | $121.78 Million | ▲ +145.2% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | $54.78 Million | $136.70 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | $83.28 Million | $118.31 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2005 | 0.90x | $103.99 Million | $114.95 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2004 | 1.13x | $96.27 Million | $84.92 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2003 | 0.79x | $71.88 Million | $90.89 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2002 | 0.94x | $39.04 Million | $41.34 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2001 | 0.60x | $11.71 Million | $19.61 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2000 | 1.03x | $22.61 Million | $21.89 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 1999 | 0.58x | $12.30 Million | $21.20 Million | — |