Silicon Laboratories Inc (SLAB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Silicon Laboratories Inc (SLAB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.93 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($167.93 Million) in one year. See Silicon Laboratories Inc (SLAB) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Silicon Laboratories Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Silicon Laboratories Inc across 27 annual periods. Also explore Silicon Laboratories Inc equity growth rate to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Silicon Laboratories Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Silicon Laboratories Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Silicon Laboratories Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.55x | $95.71 Million | $174.90 Million | ▲ +661.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-13.91 Million | $142.65 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2023 | -0.13x | $-30.35 Million | $234.37 Million | ▼ -237.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $71.81 Million | $764.42 Million | ▲ +169.8% |
| 2021 | -0.13x | $-100.44 Million | $745.87 Million | ▼ -178.7% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $135.72 Million | $793.65 Million | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $166.52 Million | $559.80 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $173.54 Million | $557.06 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $189.52 Million | $582.07 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $128.91 Million | $254.89 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | $105.45 Million | $250.35 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2014 | 0.48x | $137.44 Million | $284.50 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2013 | 0.48x | $120.15 Million | $252.59 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $97.05 Million | $221.99 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2011 | 0.83x | $88.74 Million | $107.05 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2010 | 1.15x | $117.94 Million | $102.23 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2009 | 1.07x | $120.94 Million | $113.04 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $119.68 Million | $121.78 Million | ▲ +145.2% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | $54.78 Million | $136.70 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | $83.28 Million | $118.31 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2005 | 0.90x | $103.99 Million | $114.95 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2004 | 1.13x | $96.27 Million | $84.92 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2003 | 0.79x | $71.88 Million | $90.89 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2002 | 0.94x | $39.04 Million | $41.34 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2001 | 0.60x | $11.71 Million | $19.61 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2000 | 1.03x | $22.61 Million | $21.89 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 1999 | 0.58x | $12.30 Million | $21.20 Million | — |