Silicon Laboratories Inc (SLAB) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Silicon Laboratories Inc (SLAB) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.03x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $4.93 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($167.93 Million) in one year. See Silicon Laboratories Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Silicon Laboratories Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1999–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Silicon Laboratories Inc across 27 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Silicon Laboratories Inc (SLAB) cash conversion ratio.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Silicon Laboratories Inc (1999–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Silicon Laboratories Inc. Check Silicon Laboratories Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.55x | $95.71 Million | $174.90 Million | ▲ +661.2% |
| 2024 | -0.10x | $-13.91 Million | $142.65 Million | ▲ +24.7% |
| 2023 | -0.13x | $-30.35 Million | $234.37 Million | ▼ -237.8% |
| 2022 | 0.09x | $71.81 Million | $764.42 Million | ▲ +169.8% |
| 2021 | -0.13x | $-100.44 Million | $745.87 Million | ▼ -178.7% |
| 2020 | 0.17x | $135.72 Million | $793.65 Million | ▼ -42.5% |
| 2019 | 0.30x | $166.52 Million | $559.80 Million | ▼ -4.5% |
| 2018 | 0.31x | $173.54 Million | $557.06 Million | ▼ -4.3% |
| 2017 | 0.33x | $189.52 Million | $582.07 Million | ▼ -35.6% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $128.91 Million | $254.89 Million | ▲ +20.1% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | $105.45 Million | $250.35 Million | ▼ -12.8% |
| 2014 | 0.48x | $137.44 Million | $284.50 Million | ▲ +1.6% |
| 2013 | 0.48x | $120.15 Million | $252.59 Million | ▲ +8.8% |
| 2012 | 0.44x | $97.05 Million | $221.99 Million | ▼ -47.3% |
| 2011 | 0.83x | $88.74 Million | $107.05 Million | ▼ -28.1% |
| 2010 | 1.15x | $117.94 Million | $102.23 Million | ▲ +7.8% |
| 2009 | 1.07x | $120.94 Million | $113.04 Million | ▲ +8.9% |
| 2008 | 0.98x | $119.68 Million | $121.78 Million | ▲ +145.2% |
| 2007 | 0.40x | $54.78 Million | $136.70 Million | ▼ -43.1% |
| 2006 | 0.70x | $83.28 Million | $118.31 Million | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2005 | 0.90x | $103.99 Million | $114.95 Million | ▼ -20.2% |
| 2004 | 1.13x | $96.27 Million | $84.92 Million | ▲ +43.3% |
| 2003 | 0.79x | $71.88 Million | $90.89 Million | ▼ -16.2% |
| 2002 | 0.94x | $39.04 Million | $41.34 Million | ▲ +58.1% |
| 2001 | 0.60x | $11.71 Million | $19.61 Million | ▼ -42.2% |
| 2000 | 1.03x | $22.61 Million | $21.89 Million | ▲ +78.0% |
| 1999 | 0.58x | $12.30 Million | $21.20 Million | — |