Soluna Holdings Inc (SLNH) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Soluna Holdings Inc (SLNH) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.67 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($75.70 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Soluna Holdings Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Soluna Holdings Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Soluna Holdings Inc across 33 annual periods. Also explore SLNH year-over-year net asset growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Soluna Holdings Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Soluna Holdings Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see SLNH market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.12x | $-9.15 Million | $75.70 Million | ▼ -44.7% |
| 2024 | -0.08x | $-5.07 Million | $60.68 Million | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2023 | -0.08x | $-2.99 Million | $37.92 Million | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2022 | -0.15x | $-5.75 Million | $38.69 Million | ▼ -171.5% |
| 2021 | 0.21x | $5.55 Million | $26.71 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2020 | 0.70x | $1.90 Million | $2.73 Million | ▲ +362.0% |
| 2019 | 0.15x | $289.00K | $1.92 Million | ▼ -91.0% |
| 2018 | 1.67x | $2.00 Million | $1.19 Million | ▲ +471.1% |
| 2017 | 0.29x | $363.00K | $1.24 Million | ▼ -42.1% |
| 2016 | 0.51x | $522.00K | $1.03 Million | ▲ +137.6% |
| 2015 | -1.35x | $-1.43 Million | $1.06 Million | ▼ -347.5% |
| 2014 | 0.54x | $686.00K | $1.26 Million | ▼ -38.9% |
| 2013 | 0.89x | $1.02 Million | $1.14 Million | ▲ +209.2% |
| 2012 | -0.82x | $-1.51 Million | $1.85 Million | ▼ -1909.6% |
| 2011 | 0.05x | $67.00K | $1.49 Million | ▲ +104.9% |
| 2010 | -0.92x | $-1.51 Million | $1.64 Million | ▲ +27.3% |
| 2009 | -1.26x | $-2.17 Million | $1.72 Million | ▲ +51.4% |
| 2008 | -2.60x | $-10.35 Million | $3.98 Million | ▼ -6.0% |
| 2007 | -2.45x | $-11.68 Million | $4.77 Million | ▼ -106.9% |
| 2006 | -1.18x | $-12.71 Million | $10.73 Million | ▲ +22.6% |
| 2005 | -1.53x | $-12.57 Million | $8.22 Million | ▼ -27.3% |
| 2004 | -1.20x | $-11.98 Million | $9.97 Million | ▼ -163.5% |
| 2003 | -0.46x | $-7.65 Million | $16.79 Million | ▲ +16.2% |
| 2002 | -0.54x | $-6.25 Million | $11.49 Million | ▼ -31.3% |
| 2001 | -0.41x | $-7.00 Million | $16.88 Million | ▼ -247.7% |
| 2000 | -0.12x | $-3.84 Million | $32.24 Million | ▲ +73.5% |
| 1999 | -0.45x | $-1.80 Million | $4.00 Million | ▼ -1000.0% |
| 1998 | 0.05x | $500.00K | $10.00 Million | ▼ -67.2% |
| 1997 | 0.15x | $998.00K | $6.54 Million | ▼ -0.5% |
| 1996 | 0.15x | $1.88 Million | $12.29 Million | ▲ +668.7% |
| 1993 | 0.02x | $600.00K | $30.10 Million | ▼ -82.7% |
| 1992 | 0.12x | $3.20 Million | $27.80 Million | ▲ +152.4% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $1.40 Million | $30.70 Million | — |