Senstar Technologies Ltd (SNT) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Senstar Technologies Ltd (SNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.29 Million) in one year. See SNT financial flexibility score to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Senstar Technologies Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1993–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Senstar Technologies Ltd across 33 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Senstar Technologies Ltd generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Senstar Technologies Ltd (1993–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Senstar Technologies Ltd. Check SNT operating cash flow to net income to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $1.75 Million | $11.45 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $6.66 Million | $14.40 Million | ▲ +2224.3% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $260.00K | $13.07 Million | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2022 | -0.67x | $-9.52 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -362.6% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | $6.03 Million | $23.63 Million | ▲ +351.0% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $2.32 Million | $40.96 Million | ▲ +149.1% |
| 2019 | -0.12x | $-4.52 Million | $39.24 Million | ▼ -159.7% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $7.33 Million | $37.95 Million | ▲ +392.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-1.95 Million | $29.60 Million | ▼ -117.8% |
| 2016 | 0.37x | $8.93 Million | $24.07 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | $5.46 Million | $19.30 Million | ▲ +559.8% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.71 Million | $27.80 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-2.59 Million | $30.25 Million | ▼ -149.1% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $5.71 Million | $32.71 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2011 | 0.58x | $20.42 Million | $34.98 Million | ▲ +647.4% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | $-4.00 Million | $37.48 Million | ▼ -152.1% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $5.77 Million | $28.18 Million | ▲ +1613.1% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $715.00K | $59.82 Million | ▼ -92.7% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $9.90 Million | $60.58 Million | ▲ +640.8% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-1.38 Million | $45.53 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-4.14 Million | $44.89 Million | ▼ -186.3% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $3.68 Million | $34.43 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $1.75 Million | $32.46 Million | ▲ +151.6% |
| 2002 | -0.10x | $-2.57 Million | $24.71 Million | ▼ -484.4% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | $-368.00K | $20.65 Million | ▼ -107.0% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | $4.55 Million | $17.97 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $2.49 Million | $13.07 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $3.80 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $2.80 Million | $16.70 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $1.00 Million | $7.10 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $1.00 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +229.3% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $300.00K | $8.10 Million | ▲ +132.9% |
| 1993 | -0.11x | $-800.00K | $7.10 Million | — |