Senstar Technologies Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Senstar Technologies Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio. Senstar Technologies Ltd (SNT) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.14x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.75 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($12.29 Million) in one year. Check Senstar Technologies Ltd earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Senstar Technologies Ltd (1993–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Senstar Technologies Ltd from 1993 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Senstar Technologies Ltd across 33 annual periods. Check Senstar Technologies Ltd (SNT) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Senstar Technologies Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1993–2025)
Senstar Technologies Ltd cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1993 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Senstar Technologies Ltd. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SNT cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.15x | $1.75 Million | $11.45 Million | ▼ -66.8% |
| 2024 | 0.46x | $6.66 Million | $14.40 Million | ▲ +2224.3% |
| 2023 | 0.02x | $260.00K | $13.07 Million | ▲ +103.0% |
| 2022 | -0.67x | $-9.52 Million | $14.20 Million | ▼ -362.6% |
| 2021 | 0.26x | $6.03 Million | $23.63 Million | ▲ +351.0% |
| 2020 | 0.06x | $2.32 Million | $40.96 Million | ▲ +149.1% |
| 2019 | -0.12x | $-4.52 Million | $39.24 Million | ▼ -159.7% |
| 2018 | 0.19x | $7.33 Million | $37.95 Million | ▲ +392.7% |
| 2017 | -0.07x | $-1.95 Million | $29.60 Million | ▼ -117.8% |
| 2016 | 0.37x | $8.93 Million | $24.07 Million | ▲ +31.2% |
| 2015 | 0.28x | $5.46 Million | $19.30 Million | ▲ +559.8% |
| 2014 | -0.06x | $-1.71 Million | $27.80 Million | ▲ +28.2% |
| 2013 | -0.09x | $-2.59 Million | $30.25 Million | ▼ -149.1% |
| 2012 | 0.17x | $5.71 Million | $32.71 Million | ▼ -70.1% |
| 2011 | 0.58x | $20.42 Million | $34.98 Million | ▲ +647.4% |
| 2010 | -0.11x | $-4.00 Million | $37.48 Million | ▼ -152.1% |
| 2009 | 0.20x | $5.77 Million | $28.18 Million | ▲ +1613.1% |
| 2008 | 0.01x | $715.00K | $59.82 Million | ▼ -92.7% |
| 2007 | 0.16x | $9.90 Million | $60.58 Million | ▲ +640.8% |
| 2006 | -0.03x | $-1.38 Million | $45.53 Million | ▲ +67.2% |
| 2005 | -0.09x | $-4.14 Million | $44.89 Million | ▼ -186.3% |
| 2004 | 0.11x | $3.68 Million | $34.43 Million | ▲ +98.7% |
| 2003 | 0.05x | $1.75 Million | $32.46 Million | ▲ +151.6% |
| 2002 | -0.10x | $-2.57 Million | $24.71 Million | ▼ -484.4% |
| 2001 | -0.02x | $-368.00K | $20.65 Million | ▼ -107.0% |
| 2000 | 0.25x | $4.55 Million | $17.97 Million | ▲ +32.9% |
| 1999 | 0.19x | $2.49 Million | $13.07 Million | ▼ -17.7% |
| 1998 | 0.23x | $3.80 Million | $16.40 Million | ▲ +38.2% |
| 1997 | 0.17x | $2.80 Million | $16.70 Million | ▲ +19.0% |
| 1996 | 0.14x | $1.00 Million | $7.10 Million | ▲ +15.5% |
| 1995 | 0.12x | $1.00 Million | $8.20 Million | ▲ +229.3% |
| 1994 | 0.04x | $300.00K | $8.10 Million | ▲ +132.9% |
| 1993 | -0.11x | $-800.00K | $7.10 Million | — |