SurModics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SurModics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. SurModics Inc (SRDX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.02x as of June 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.41 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($58.51 Million) in one year. Check SurModics Inc cash earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of SurModics Inc (1998–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of SurModics Inc from 1998 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for SurModics Inc across 27 annual periods. Check SurModics Inc (SRDX) reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
SurModics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1998–2024)
SurModics Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1998 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SurModics Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SRDX operating cash flow.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.00x | $248.00K | $59.66 Million | ▼ -97.4% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $10.51 Million | $65.82 Million | ▲ +146.3% |
| 2022 | -0.34x | $-17.22 Million | $49.97 Million | ▼ -222.1% |
| 2021 | 0.28x | $15.39 Million | $54.51 Million | ▼ -24.0% |
| 2020 | 0.37x | $14.01 Million | $37.71 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2019 | 0.22x | $8.04 Million | $37.35 Million | ▼ -64.9% |
| 2018 | 0.61x | $34.05 Million | $55.52 Million | ▲ +9.3% |
| 2017 | 0.56x | $14.05 Million | $25.04 Million | ▼ -41.9% |
| 2016 | 0.97x | $25.17 Million | $26.06 Million | ▼ -56.0% |
| 2015 | 2.20x | $15.02 Million | $6.84 Million | ▼ -25.8% |
| 2014 | 2.96x | $18.18 Million | $6.14 Million | ▲ +36.0% |
| 2013 | 2.18x | $17.66 Million | $8.11 Million | ▲ +24.1% |
| 2012 | 1.76x | $16.11 Million | $9.18 Million | ▲ +52.4% |
| 2011 | 1.15x | $19.95 Million | $17.32 Million | ▼ -16.6% |
| 2010 | 1.38x | $22.01 Million | $15.92 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2009 | 2.37x | $31.32 Million | $13.19 Million | ▲ +193.5% |
| 2008 | 0.81x | $39.82 Million | $49.22 Million | ▼ -35.5% |
| 2007 | 1.26x | $50.71 Million | $40.41 Million | ▼ -56.6% |
| 2006 | 2.89x | $35.28 Million | $12.20 Million | ▼ -3.7% |
| 2005 | 3.00x | $25.95 Million | $8.64 Million | ▲ +135.3% |
| 2004 | 1.28x | $19.49 Million | $15.28 Million | ▼ -22.5% |
| 2003 | 1.65x | $19.26 Million | $11.69 Million | ▼ -16.5% |
| 2002 | 1.97x | $14.31 Million | $7.25 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 2001 | 1.60x | $7.81 Million | $4.88 Million | ▼ -47.0% |
| 2000 | 3.02x | $7.38 Million | $2.45 Million | ▲ +57.7% |
| 1999 | 1.91x | $4.40 Million | $2.30 Million | ▲ +45.8% |
| 1998 | 1.31x | $2.10 Million | $1.60 Million | — |