SSR Mining Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
SSR Mining Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. SSR Mining Inc (SSRM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.17x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $260.83 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($1.52 Billion) in one year. Check SSRM cash to earnings ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of SSR Mining Inc (1995–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of SSR Mining Inc from 1995 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for SSR Mining Inc across 31 annual periods. Check how aggressively does SSR Mining Inc reinvest cash to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
SSR Mining Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1995–2025)
SSR Mining Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1995 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for SSR Mining Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see SSR Mining Inc cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.27x | $480.11 Million | $1.78 Billion | ▲ +736.6% |
| 2024 | 0.03x | $40.13 Million | $1.24 Billion | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2023 | 0.39x | $421.73 Million | $1.08 Billion | ▲ +173.5% |
| 2022 | 0.14x | $160.90 Million | $1.13 Billion | ▼ -72.9% |
| 2021 | 0.53x | $608.99 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▲ +127.6% |
| 2020 | 0.23x | $307.10 Million | $1.33 Billion | ▲ +20.4% |
| 2019 | 0.19x | $118.14 Million | $616.15 Million | ▲ +65.3% |
| 2018 | 0.12x | $59.77 Million | $515.16 Million | ▼ -58.8% |
| 2017 | 0.28x | $144.72 Million | $513.53 Million | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2016 | 0.32x | $170.68 Million | $536.81 Million | ▲ +82.1% |
| 2015 | 0.17x | $74.11 Million | $424.49 Million | ▲ +3.2% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $68.83 Million | $407.00 Million | ▲ +198.1% |
| 2013 | 0.06x | $19.47 Million | $343.26 Million | ▼ -60.6% |
| 2012 | 0.14x | $37.99 Million | $263.81 Million | ▲ +640.8% |
| 2011 | 0.02x | $5.68 Million | $292.13 Million | ▲ +137.8% |
| 2010 | -0.05x | $-11.11 Million | $216.13 Million | ▲ +72.6% |
| 2009 | -0.19x | $-39.94 Million | $212.74 Million | ▼ -327.7% |
| 2008 | 0.08x | $14.79 Million | $179.42 Million | ▲ +179.7% |
| 2007 | -0.10x | $-4.58 Million | $44.22 Million | ▲ +6.9% |
| 2006 | -0.11x | $-3.28 Million | $29.55 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 2005 | -0.11x | $-2.54 Million | $22.47 Million | ▼ -13.0% |
| 2004 | -0.10x | $-2.03 Million | $20.32 Million | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2003 | -1.23x | $-2.55 Million | $2.07 Million | ▼ -52.3% |
| 2002 | -0.81x | $-1.43 Million | $1.77 Million | ▼ -116.9% |
| 2001 | -0.37x | $-1.03 Million | $2.77 Million | ▲ +80.1% |
| 2000 | -1.87x | $-1.33 Million | $710.09K | ▼ -70.4% |
| 1999 | -1.10x | $-759.18K | $690.25K | ▼ -340.4% |
| 1998 | -0.25x | $-259.56K | $1.04 Million | ▲ +65.7% |
| 1997 | -0.73x | $-559.45K | $768.24K | ▼ -14.4% |
| 1996 | -0.64x | $-511.01K | $803.01K | ▼ -248.5% |
| 1995 | 0.43x | $300.00K | $700.00K | — |