Tenax Therapeutics Inc (TENX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tenax Therapeutics Inc (TENX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.87x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-13.41 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities ($7.16 Million) in one year. Explore Tenax Therapeutics Inc strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tenax Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tenax Therapeutics Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore TENX total assets for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tenax Therapeutics Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tenax Therapeutics Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Tenax Therapeutics Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -5.00x | $-35.80 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2024 | -3.16x | $-14.81 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2023 | -1.65x | $-5.90 Million | $3.59 Million | ▲ +73.8% |
| 2022 | -6.28x | $-12.01 Million | $1.91 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2021 | -6.21x | $-10.86 Million | $1.75 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2020 | -4.13x | $-9.27 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2019 | -2.91x | $-7.56 Million | $2.59 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2018 | -3.51x | $-5.50 Million | $1.57 Million | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2017 | -12.03x | $-12.14 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -370.0% |
| 2016 | -2.56x | $-15.87 Million | $6.20 Million | ▼ -229.9% |
| 2015 | -0.78x | $-9.75 Million | $12.56 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2014 | -0.88x | $-9.26 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.88x | $-9.26 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2012 | -1.35x | $-4.92 Million | $3.64 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2011 | -1.24x | $-8.40 Million | $6.76 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2010 | -6.12x | $-8.59 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2009 | -3.38x | $-4.06 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -166.5% |
| 2008 | -1.27x | $-2.28 Million | $1.79 Million | ▼ -174.6% |
| 2007 | -0.46x | $-1.14 Million | $2.46 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2006 | -5.06x | $-2.15 Million | $424.57K | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2005 | -6.34x | $-1.99 Million | $313.94K | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2004 | -4.91x | $-1.77 Million | $361.51K | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2003 | -6.27x | $-2.09 Million | $333.75K | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2002 | -23.27x | $-1.90 Million | $81.55K | ▼ -502.6% |
| 2001 | -3.86x | $-1.54 Million | $398.09K | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2000 | -2.64x | $-913.30K | $345.44K | ▼ -98.3% |
| 1999 | -1.33x | $-800.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -46.9% |
| 1998 | -0.91x | $-575.69K | $634.36K | ▲ +37.5% |
| 1997 | -1.45x | $-872.15K | $600.67K | ▲ +5.9% |
| 1996 | -1.54x | $-1.53 Million | $991.54K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | -1.54x | $-1.53 Million | $991.54K | — |