Tenax Therapeutics Inc (TENX) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tenax Therapeutics Inc (TENX) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -1.75x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-14.15 Million could theoretically repay -2% of its total liabilities ($8.07 Million) in one year. See Tenax Therapeutics Inc (TENX) financial flexibility to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tenax Therapeutics Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1995–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tenax Therapeutics Inc across 31 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Tenax Therapeutics Inc.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tenax Therapeutics Inc (1995–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tenax Therapeutics Inc. Check how high is Tenax Therapeutics Inc's earnings quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -5.00x | $-35.80 Million | $7.16 Million | ▼ -58.5% |
| 2024 | -3.16x | $-14.81 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -91.7% |
| 2023 | -1.65x | $-5.90 Million | $3.59 Million | ▲ +73.8% |
| 2022 | -6.28x | $-12.01 Million | $1.91 Million | ▼ -1.1% |
| 2021 | -6.21x | $-10.86 Million | $1.75 Million | ▼ -50.3% |
| 2020 | -4.13x | $-9.27 Million | $2.24 Million | ▼ -41.8% |
| 2019 | -2.91x | $-7.56 Million | $2.59 Million | ▲ +17.0% |
| 2018 | -3.51x | $-5.50 Million | $1.57 Million | ▲ +70.8% |
| 2017 | -12.03x | $-12.14 Million | $1.01 Million | ▼ -370.0% |
| 2016 | -2.56x | $-15.87 Million | $6.20 Million | ▼ -229.9% |
| 2015 | -0.78x | $-9.75 Million | $12.56 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2014 | -0.88x | $-9.26 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 2013 | -0.88x | $-9.26 Million | $10.54 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2012 | -1.35x | $-4.92 Million | $3.64 Million | ▼ -8.9% |
| 2011 | -1.24x | $-8.40 Million | $6.76 Million | ▲ +79.7% |
| 2010 | -6.12x | $-8.59 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -81.0% |
| 2009 | -3.38x | $-4.06 Million | $1.20 Million | ▼ -166.5% |
| 2008 | -1.27x | $-2.28 Million | $1.79 Million | ▼ -174.6% |
| 2007 | -0.46x | $-1.14 Million | $2.46 Million | ▲ +90.9% |
| 2006 | -5.06x | $-2.15 Million | $424.57K | ▲ +20.3% |
| 2005 | -6.34x | $-1.99 Million | $313.94K | ▼ -29.3% |
| 2004 | -4.91x | $-1.77 Million | $361.51K | ▲ +21.8% |
| 2003 | -6.27x | $-2.09 Million | $333.75K | ▲ +73.0% |
| 2002 | -23.27x | $-1.90 Million | $81.55K | ▼ -502.6% |
| 2001 | -3.86x | $-1.54 Million | $398.09K | ▼ -46.1% |
| 2000 | -2.64x | $-913.30K | $345.44K | ▼ -98.3% |
| 1999 | -1.33x | $-800.00K | $600.00K | ▼ -46.9% |
| 1998 | -0.91x | $-575.69K | $634.36K | ▲ +37.5% |
| 1997 | -1.45x | $-872.15K | $600.67K | ▲ +5.9% |
| 1996 | -1.54x | $-1.53 Million | $991.54K | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1995 | -1.54x | $-1.53 Million | $991.54K | — |