Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (TLSA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.53x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.02 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($11.44 Million) in one year. See Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd free cash flow ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1998–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd across 28 annual periods. Also explore TLSA net assets growth trend to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd (1998–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Tiziana Life Sciences Ltd worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -1.12x | $-12.85 Million | $11.44 Million | ▼ -576.5% |
| 2024 | -0.17x | $-1.22 Million | $7.35 Million | ▲ +91.1% |
| 2023 | -1.87x | $-12.42 Million | $6.65 Million | ▲ +19.3% |
| 2022 | -2.32x | $-15.99 Million | $6.91 Million | ▼ -8.3% |
| 2021 | -2.14x | $-16.13 Million | $7.55 Million | ▼ -101.9% |
| 2020 | -1.06x | $-8.76 Million | $8.27 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 2019 | -0.88x | $-5.29 Million | $5.99 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2018 | -0.72x | $-3.63 Million | $5.04 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2017 | -1.62x | $-5.68 Million | $3.51 Million | ▲ +50.0% |
| 2016 | -3.23x | $-5.62 Million | $1.74 Million | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2015 | -7.64x | $-5.70 Million | $746.00K | ▼ -125.5% |
| 2014 | -3.39x | $-2.31 Million | $683.00K | ▼ -848.4% |
| 2013 | -0.36x | $-97.13K | $272.00K | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2012 | -1.68x | $-227.89K | $136.00K | ▲ +81.0% |
| 2011 | -8.82x | $-881.91K | $100.00K | ▼ -799.5% |
| 2010 | -0.98x | $-407.86K | $416.00K | ▲ +5.3% |
| 2009 | -1.04x | $-535.42K | $517.00K | ▲ +30.8% |
| 2008 | -1.50x | $-959.80K | $641.00K | ▲ +67.8% |
| 2007 | -4.65x | $-2.15 Million | $462.00K | ▼ -73.5% |
| 2006 | -2.68x | $-1.96 Million | $732.00K | ▼ -40.0% |
| 2005 | -1.92x | $-1.18 Million | $618.00K | ▲ +33.1% |
| 2004 | -2.86x | $-1.72 Million | $601.00K | ▲ +47.0% |
| 2003 | -5.40x | $-1.52 Million | $282.00K | ▼ -23.5% |
| 2002 | -4.38x | $-1.57 Million | $359.00K | ▲ +35.3% |
| 2001 | -6.77x | $-2.46 Million | $363.00K | ▼ -52.1% |
| 2000 | -4.45x | $-2.19 Million | $493.00K | ▼ -208.9% |
| 1999 | -1.44x | $-527.00K | $366.00K | ▼ -94.6% |
| 1998 | -0.74x | $-310.00K | $419.00K | — |