TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc (TOMZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.23x as of June 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $-1.59 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($6.95 Million) in one year. Check TOMZ cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc (2005–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc from 2005 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc across 21 annual periods. Check TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (2005–2025)
TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 2005 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.19x | $-1.20 Million | $6.45 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2024 | -0.26x | $-1.44 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2023 | -0.72x | $-3.60 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -136.3% |
| 2022 | -0.30x | $-1.23 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2021 | -1.43x | $-3.82 Million | $2.68 Million | ▼ -211.3% |
| 2020 | 1.28x | $4.58 Million | $3.57 Million | ▲ +1255.9% |
| 2019 | -0.11x | $-814.45K | $7.34 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | $-1.77 Million | $7.08 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2017 | -0.35x | $-2.43 Million | $7.05 Million | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2016 | -4.28x | $-4.50 Million | $1.05 Million | ▼ -262.4% |
| 2015 | -1.18x | $-1.65 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -274.8% |
| 2014 | -0.31x | $-1.13 Million | $3.58 Million | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2013 | -0.15x | $-1.31 Million | $8.52 Million | ▲ +90.7% |
| 2012 | -1.65x | $-386.19K | $234.47K | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2011 | -0.83x | $-329.32K | $397.06K | ▼ -294.6% |
| 2010 | -0.21x | $-278.08K | $1.32 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2009 | -0.25x | $-414.48K | $1.69 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2008 | -0.78x | $-721.06K | $922.87K | ▼ -219.6% |
| 2007 | -0.24x | $-11.60K | $47.46K | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | $-10.00K | $50.00K | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2005 | -0.36x | $-13.31K | $36.50K | — |