TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc (TOMZ) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc (TOMZ) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $295.55K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($7.46 Million) in one year. See TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2005–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc across 21 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc (2005–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc. Check cash flow quality index of TOMI Environmental Solutions Inc to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -0.19x | $-1.20 Million | $6.45 Million | ▲ +27.9% |
| 2024 | -0.26x | $-1.44 Million | $5.59 Million | ▲ +64.2% |
| 2023 | -0.72x | $-3.60 Million | $5.00 Million | ▼ -136.3% |
| 2022 | -0.30x | $-1.23 Million | $4.05 Million | ▲ +78.7% |
| 2021 | -1.43x | $-3.82 Million | $2.68 Million | ▼ -211.3% |
| 2020 | 1.28x | $4.58 Million | $3.57 Million | ▲ +1255.9% |
| 2019 | -0.11x | $-814.45K | $7.34 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2018 | -0.25x | $-1.77 Million | $7.08 Million | ▲ +27.7% |
| 2017 | -0.35x | $-2.43 Million | $7.05 Million | ▲ +91.9% |
| 2016 | -4.28x | $-4.50 Million | $1.05 Million | ▼ -262.4% |
| 2015 | -1.18x | $-1.65 Million | $1.40 Million | ▼ -274.8% |
| 2014 | -0.31x | $-1.13 Million | $3.58 Million | ▼ -105.5% |
| 2013 | -0.15x | $-1.31 Million | $8.52 Million | ▲ +90.7% |
| 2012 | -1.65x | $-386.19K | $234.47K | ▼ -98.6% |
| 2011 | -0.83x | $-329.32K | $397.06K | ▼ -294.6% |
| 2010 | -0.21x | $-278.08K | $1.32 Million | ▲ +14.5% |
| 2009 | -0.25x | $-414.48K | $1.69 Million | ▲ +68.5% |
| 2008 | -0.78x | $-721.06K | $922.87K | ▼ -219.6% |
| 2007 | -0.24x | $-11.60K | $47.46K | ▼ -22.2% |
| 2006 | -0.20x | $-10.00K | $50.00K | ▲ +45.2% |
| 2005 | -0.36x | $-13.31K | $36.50K | — |