Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $165.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.50 Billion) in one year. See Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tetra Tech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tetra Tech Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore Tetra Tech Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tetra Tech Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tetra Tech Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Tetra Tech Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $457.69 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $358.71 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $368.46 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $336.19 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $304.37 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $262.48 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $208.51 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $176.86 Million | $982.35 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $137.99 Million | $974.12 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $142.02 Million | $927.82 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $162.85 Million | $702.44 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $127.38 Million | $763.35 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $137.75 Million | $800.29 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $158.02 Million | $651.16 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $131.62 Million | $738.74 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $106.81 Million | $633.56 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2009 | 0.44x | $198.25 Million | $451.43 Million | ▲ +250.0% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $68.38 Million | $545.03 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $46.68 Million | $431.78 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $57.38 Million | $346.88 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $48.49 Million | $343.43 Million | ▲ +258.3% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $16.20 Million | $411.01 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | $66.77 Million | $330.93 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $95.21 Million | $255.68 Million | ▲ +97.7% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $44.27 Million | $235.07 Million | ▲ +452.5% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | $-12.19 Million | $228.13 Million | ▼ -125.8% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $30.30 Million | $146.10 Million | ▲ +410.5% |
| 1998 | -0.07x | $-6.60 Million | $98.80 Million | ▼ -333.2% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $1.10 Million | $38.40 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1996 | 0.84x | $21.10 Million | $25.20 Million | ▲ +216.5% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $13.60 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 1994 | 0.61x | $11.10 Million | $18.10 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 1993 | 0.44x | $5.40 Million | $12.20 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1992 | 0.31x | $2.50 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +233.7% |
| 1991 | 0.09x | $1.60 Million | $17.30 Million | — |