Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $165.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.50 Billion) in one year. See Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) flexibility index to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tetra Tech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tetra Tech Inc across 35 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see how efficiently does Tetra Tech Inc generate cash.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tetra Tech Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tetra Tech Inc. Check Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $457.69 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $358.71 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $368.46 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $336.19 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $304.37 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $262.48 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $208.51 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $176.86 Million | $982.35 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $137.99 Million | $974.12 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $142.02 Million | $927.82 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $162.85 Million | $702.44 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $127.38 Million | $763.35 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $137.75 Million | $800.29 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $158.02 Million | $651.16 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $131.62 Million | $738.74 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $106.81 Million | $633.56 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2009 | 0.44x | $198.25 Million | $451.43 Million | ▲ +250.0% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $68.38 Million | $545.03 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $46.68 Million | $431.78 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $57.38 Million | $346.88 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $48.49 Million | $343.43 Million | ▲ +258.3% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $16.20 Million | $411.01 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | $66.77 Million | $330.93 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $95.21 Million | $255.68 Million | ▲ +97.7% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $44.27 Million | $235.07 Million | ▲ +452.5% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | $-12.19 Million | $228.13 Million | ▼ -125.8% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $30.30 Million | $146.10 Million | ▲ +410.5% |
| 1998 | -0.07x | $-6.60 Million | $98.80 Million | ▼ -333.2% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $1.10 Million | $38.40 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1996 | 0.84x | $21.10 Million | $25.20 Million | ▲ +216.5% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $13.60 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 1994 | 0.61x | $11.10 Million | $18.10 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 1993 | 0.44x | $5.40 Million | $12.20 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1992 | 0.31x | $2.50 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +233.7% |
| 1991 | 0.09x | $1.60 Million | $17.30 Million | — |