Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $165.34 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($2.50 Billion) in one year. Explore Tetra Tech Inc (TTEK) investment intensity to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Tetra Tech Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Tetra Tech Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore Tetra Tech Inc asset portfolio for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Tetra Tech Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Tetra Tech Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TTEK company net worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.18x | $457.69 Million | $2.50 Billion | ▲ +20.5% |
| 2024 | 0.15x | $358.71 Million | $2.36 Billion | ▼ -0.2% |
| 2023 | 0.15x | $368.46 Million | $2.42 Billion | ▼ -34.8% |
| 2022 | 0.23x | $336.19 Million | $1.44 Billion | ▲ +3.0% |
| 2021 | 0.23x | $304.37 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +15.9% |
| 2020 | 0.20x | $262.48 Million | $1.34 Billion | ▲ +9.1% |
| 2019 | 0.18x | $208.51 Million | $1.16 Billion | ▼ -0.4% |
| 2018 | 0.18x | $176.86 Million | $982.35 Million | ▲ +27.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $137.99 Million | $974.12 Million | ▼ -7.5% |
| 2016 | 0.15x | $142.02 Million | $927.82 Million | ▼ -34.0% |
| 2015 | 0.23x | $162.85 Million | $702.44 Million | ▲ +38.9% |
| 2014 | 0.17x | $127.38 Million | $763.35 Million | ▼ -3.1% |
| 2013 | 0.17x | $137.75 Million | $800.29 Million | ▼ -29.1% |
| 2012 | 0.24x | $158.02 Million | $651.16 Million | ▲ +36.2% |
| 2011 | 0.18x | $131.62 Million | $738.74 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2010 | 0.17x | $106.81 Million | $633.56 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2009 | 0.44x | $198.25 Million | $451.43 Million | ▲ +250.0% |
| 2008 | 0.13x | $68.38 Million | $545.03 Million | ▲ +16.1% |
| 2007 | 0.11x | $46.68 Million | $431.78 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2006 | 0.17x | $57.38 Million | $346.88 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2005 | 0.14x | $48.49 Million | $343.43 Million | ▲ +258.3% |
| 2004 | 0.04x | $16.20 Million | $411.01 Million | ▼ -80.5% |
| 2003 | 0.20x | $66.77 Million | $330.93 Million | ▼ -45.8% |
| 2002 | 0.37x | $95.21 Million | $255.68 Million | ▲ +97.7% |
| 2001 | 0.19x | $44.27 Million | $235.07 Million | ▲ +452.5% |
| 2000 | -0.05x | $-12.19 Million | $228.13 Million | ▼ -125.8% |
| 1999 | 0.21x | $30.30 Million | $146.10 Million | ▲ +410.5% |
| 1998 | -0.07x | $-6.60 Million | $98.80 Million | ▼ -333.2% |
| 1997 | 0.03x | $1.10 Million | $38.40 Million | ▼ -96.6% |
| 1996 | 0.84x | $21.10 Million | $25.20 Million | ▲ +216.5% |
| 1995 | 0.26x | $13.60 Million | $51.40 Million | ▼ -56.9% |
| 1994 | 0.61x | $11.10 Million | $18.10 Million | ▲ +38.6% |
| 1993 | 0.44x | $5.40 Million | $12.20 Million | ▲ +43.4% |
| 1992 | 0.31x | $2.50 Million | $8.10 Million | ▲ +233.7% |
| 1991 | 0.09x | $1.60 Million | $17.30 Million | — |