TherapeuticsMD Inc (TXMD) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
TherapeuticsMD Inc (TXMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.13x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $1.37 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($10.78 Million) in one year. Check TherapeuticsMD Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
TherapeuticsMD Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for TherapeuticsMD Inc across 32 annual periods. Also explore TXMD asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for TherapeuticsMD Inc (1994–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for TherapeuticsMD Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see TXMD market cap overview.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.23x | $2.45 Million | $10.78 Million | ▲ +256.1% |
| 2024 | 0.06x | $732.00K | $11.45 Million | ▲ +101.9% |
| 2023 | -3.43x | $-48.14 Million | $14.02 Million | ▼ -4556.9% |
| 2022 | -0.07x | $-4.08 Million | $55.31 Million | ▲ +86.9% |
| 2021 | -0.56x | $-147.81 Million | $263.09 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2020 | -0.52x | $-159.47 Million | $305.61 Million | ▲ +19.1% |
| 2019 | -0.65x | $-165.70 Million | $256.78 Million | ▲ +30.9% |
| 2018 | -0.93x | $-106.81 Million | $114.46 Million | ▲ +83.7% |
| 2017 | -5.72x | $-76.16 Million | $13.32 Million | ▼ -23.9% |
| 2016 | -4.61x | $-69.14 Million | $14.98 Million | ▲ +37.7% |
| 2015 | -7.41x | $-79.04 Million | $10.67 Million | ▼ -74.0% |
| 2014 | -4.26x | $-45.52 Million | $10.69 Million | ▼ -50.0% |
| 2013 | -2.84x | $-20.77 Million | $7.32 Million | ▼ -61.6% |
| 2012 | -1.76x | $-12.74 Million | $7.25 Million | ▼ -11.4% |
| 2011 | -1.58x | $-4.97 Million | $3.15 Million | ▼ -359.0% |
| 2010 | 0.61x | $836.83K | $1.37 Million | ▲ +269.3% |
| 2009 | -0.36x | $-417.34K | $1.16 Million | ▲ +90.3% |
| 2008 | -3.72x | $-133.00K | $35.72K | ▼ -184.2% |
| 2007 | 4.42x | $344.10K | $77.83K | ▲ +141.0% |
| 2006 | 1.83x | $329.84K | $179.83K | ▲ +119.4% |
| 2005 | 0.84x | $412.34K | $493.18K | ▼ -85.1% |
| 2004 | 5.60x | $207.73K | $37.12K | ▲ +28.4% |
| 2003 | 4.36x | $140.00K | $32.11K | ▼ -26.8% |
| 2002 | 5.96x | $100.08K | $16.80K | ▼ -15.3% |
| 2001 | 7.03x | $161.95K | $23.04K | ▼ -15.0% |
| 2000 | 8.27x | $133.97K | $16.21K | ▲ +203.3% |
| 1999 | 2.73x | $48.53K | $17.81K | ▲ +210.0% |
| 1998 | 0.88x | $44.60K | $50.72K | ▼ -92.1% |
| 1997 | 11.10x | $77.53K | $6.98K | ▼ -8.9% |
| 1996 | 12.19x | $58.78K | $4.82K | ▲ +1138.6% |
| 1995 | 0.98x | $63.45K | $64.49K | ▼ -84.5% |
| 1994 | 6.35x | $72.86K | $11.47K | — |