US Energy Corp (USEG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
US Energy Corp (USEG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-155.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.46 Million) in one year. See US Energy Corp (USEG) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
US Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for US Energy Corp across 38 annual periods. Also explore net asset momentum of US Energy Corp to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for US Energy Corp (1987–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for US Energy Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see US Energy Corp (USEG) total market value.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.18x | $4.59 Million | $25.85 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $5.47 Million | $33.92 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | $10.90 Million | $39.97 Million | ▲ +853.5% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-153.00K | $4.23 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2020 | -0.19x | $-717.00K | $3.80 Million | ▼ -166.8% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $638.00K | $2.26 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | $-490.00K | $3.06 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2017 | -0.19x | $-892.00K | $4.65 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2016 | -0.14x | $-1.85 Million | $13.01 Million | ▼ -4029.8% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $64.00K | $17.66 Million | ▼ -99.7% |
| 2014 | 1.29x | $20.75 Million | $16.13 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2013 | 0.98x | $17.41 Million | $17.74 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2012 | 0.54x | $13.26 Million | $24.71 Million | ▲ +474.0% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $3.33 Million | $35.66 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $12.37 Million | $25.33 Million | ▲ +236.7% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $2.55 Million | $17.59 Million | ▲ +167.6% |
| 2008 | -0.21x | $-6.61 Million | $30.80 Million | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2007 | -1.94x | $-31.70 Million | $16.30 Million | ▼ -240.1% |
| 2006 | -0.57x | $-8.13 Million | $14.22 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2005 | -0.51x | $-6.06 Million | $11.78 Million | ▼ -165.1% |
| 2004 | -0.19x | $-4.57 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2003 | -0.34x | $-5.67 Million | $16.67 Million | ▼ -141.1% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | $-2.86 Million | $20.25 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2001 | -0.10x | $-1.98 Million | $20.13 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2000 | -0.34x | $-6.62 Million | $19.20 Million | ▼ -255.5% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $4.30 Million | $19.40 Million | ▲ +330.7% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-2.20 Million | $22.90 Million | ▲ +25.0% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | $-2.60 Million | $20.30 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-2.80 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 1995 | -0.13x | $-2.50 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | $-2.50 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 1993 | -0.19x | $-3.80 Million | $20.20 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 1992 | -0.19x | $-900.00K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 1991 | -0.19x | $-1.00 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 1990 | -0.81x | $-2.90 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -320.7% |
| 1989 | -0.19x | $-900.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -251.1% |
| 1988 | -0.05x | $-300.00K | $5.50 Million | ▼ -443.6% |
| 1987 | 0.02x | $100.00K | $6.30 Million | — |