US Energy Corp (USEG) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
US Energy Corp (USEG) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-155.00K could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($21.46 Million) in one year. Check US Energy Corp (USEG) total reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
US Energy Corp Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1987–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for US Energy Corp across 38 annual periods. Also explore USEG total asset value for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for US Energy Corp (1987–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for US Energy Corp. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see US Energy Corp market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.18x | $4.59 Million | $25.85 Million | ▲ +10.0% |
| 2023 | 0.16x | $5.47 Million | $33.92 Million | ▼ -40.8% |
| 2022 | 0.27x | $10.90 Million | $39.97 Million | ▲ +853.5% |
| 2021 | -0.04x | $-153.00K | $4.23 Million | ▲ +80.8% |
| 2020 | -0.19x | $-717.00K | $3.80 Million | ▼ -166.8% |
| 2019 | 0.28x | $638.00K | $2.26 Million | ▲ +276.5% |
| 2018 | -0.16x | $-490.00K | $3.06 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2017 | -0.19x | $-892.00K | $4.65 Million | ▼ -34.6% |
| 2016 | -0.14x | $-1.85 Million | $13.01 Million | ▼ -4029.8% |
| 2015 | 0.00x | $64.00K | $17.66 Million | ▼ -99.7% |
| 2014 | 1.29x | $20.75 Million | $16.13 Million | ▲ +31.1% |
| 2013 | 0.98x | $17.41 Million | $17.74 Million | ▲ +82.9% |
| 2012 | 0.54x | $13.26 Million | $24.71 Million | ▲ +474.0% |
| 2011 | 0.09x | $3.33 Million | $35.66 Million | ▼ -80.9% |
| 2010 | 0.49x | $12.37 Million | $25.33 Million | ▲ +236.7% |
| 2009 | 0.15x | $2.55 Million | $17.59 Million | ▲ +167.6% |
| 2008 | -0.21x | $-6.61 Million | $30.80 Million | ▲ +89.0% |
| 2007 | -1.94x | $-31.70 Million | $16.30 Million | ▼ -240.1% |
| 2006 | -0.57x | $-8.13 Million | $14.22 Million | ▼ -11.2% |
| 2005 | -0.51x | $-6.06 Million | $11.78 Million | ▼ -165.1% |
| 2004 | -0.19x | $-4.57 Million | $23.55 Million | ▲ +43.0% |
| 2003 | -0.34x | $-5.67 Million | $16.67 Million | ▼ -141.1% |
| 2002 | -0.14x | $-2.86 Million | $20.25 Million | ▼ -43.3% |
| 2001 | -0.10x | $-1.98 Million | $20.13 Million | ▲ +71.4% |
| 2000 | -0.34x | $-6.62 Million | $19.20 Million | ▼ -255.5% |
| 1999 | 0.22x | $4.30 Million | $19.40 Million | ▲ +330.7% |
| 1998 | -0.10x | $-2.20 Million | $22.90 Million | ▲ +25.0% |
| 1997 | -0.13x | $-2.60 Million | $20.30 Million | ▲ +14.9% |
| 1996 | -0.15x | $-2.80 Million | $18.60 Million | ▼ -19.8% |
| 1995 | -0.13x | $-2.50 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +0.0% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | $-2.50 Million | $19.90 Million | ▲ +33.2% |
| 1993 | -0.19x | $-3.80 Million | $20.20 Million | ▲ +1.8% |
| 1992 | -0.19x | $-900.00K | $4.70 Million | ▲ +0.4% |
| 1991 | -0.19x | $-1.00 Million | $5.20 Million | ▲ +76.1% |
| 1990 | -0.81x | $-2.90 Million | $3.60 Million | ▼ -320.7% |
| 1989 | -0.19x | $-900.00K | $4.70 Million | ▼ -251.1% |
| 1988 | -0.05x | $-300.00K | $5.50 Million | ▼ -443.6% |
| 1987 | 0.02x | $100.00K | $6.30 Million | — |