United States Lime & Minerals Inc (USLM) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
United States Lime & Minerals Inc (USLM) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.88x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $45.56 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($51.79 Million) in one year. See United States Lime & Minerals Inc (USLM) FCF generation index to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
United States Lime & Minerals Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1991–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for United States Lime & Minerals Inc across 35 annual periods. Also explore United States Lime & Minerals Inc annual equity growth to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for United States Lime & Minerals Inc (1991–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for United States Lime & Minerals Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see USLM stock market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3.19x | $164.97 Million | $51.79 Million | ▲ +14.8% |
| 2024 | 2.77x | $126.02 Million | $45.42 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2023 | 1.94x | $92.26 Million | $47.50 Million | ▲ +40.9% |
| 2022 | 1.38x | $64.36 Million | $46.68 Million | ▼ -5.9% |
| 2021 | 1.47x | $55.69 Million | $37.99 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 2020 | 1.60x | $58.58 Million | $36.70 Million | ▲ +6.6% |
| 2019 | 1.50x | $47.01 Million | $31.39 Million | ▼ -16.1% |
| 2018 | 1.78x | $38.73 Million | $21.70 Million | ▲ +20.7% |
| 2017 | 1.48x | $34.28 Million | $23.19 Million | ▲ +19.2% |
| 2016 | 1.24x | $37.85 Million | $30.52 Million | ▲ +14.0% |
| 2015 | 1.09x | $32.49 Million | $29.87 Million | ▲ +55.6% |
| 2014 | 0.70x | $31.97 Million | $45.73 Million | ▲ +5.8% |
| 2013 | 0.66x | $33.53 Million | $50.72 Million | ▲ +10.8% |
| 2012 | 0.60x | $31.69 Million | $53.11 Million | ▼ -7.7% |
| 2011 | 0.65x | $38.51 Million | $59.55 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2010 | 0.57x | $34.18 Million | $60.20 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 2009 | 0.51x | $31.57 Million | $62.09 Million | ▲ +41.5% |
| 2008 | 0.36x | $25.76 Million | $71.68 Million | ▲ +12.3% |
| 2007 | 0.32x | $24.47 Million | $76.52 Million | ▲ +0.9% |
| 2006 | 0.32x | $25.88 Million | $81.67 Million | ▲ +19.7% |
| 2005 | 0.26x | $17.16 Million | $64.80 Million | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2004 | 0.29x | $15.11 Million | $52.12 Million | ▲ +75.2% |
| 2003 | 0.17x | $9.52 Million | $57.54 Million | ▼ -6.8% |
| 2002 | 0.18x | $8.21 Million | $46.21 Million | ▲ +4419.9% |
| 2001 | 0.00x | $200.00K | $50.90 Million | ▼ -97.3% |
| 2000 | 0.15x | $9.77 Million | $65.95 Million | ▲ +228.0% |
| 1999 | 0.05x | $2.21 Million | $48.89 Million | ▼ -79.6% |
| 1998 | 0.22x | $5.40 Million | $24.40 Million | ▼ -71.8% |
| 1997 | 0.78x | $7.30 Million | $9.30 Million | ▲ +11.7% |
| 1996 | 0.70x | $7.10 Million | $10.10 Million | ▼ -1.2% |
| 1995 | 0.71x | $7.90 Million | $11.10 Million | ▲ +66.1% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $5.40 Million | $12.60 Million | ▲ +123.4% |
| 1993 | 0.19x | $3.30 Million | $17.20 Million | ▲ +123.8% |
| 1992 | 0.09x | $1.50 Million | $17.50 Million | ▲ +65.7% |
| 1991 | 0.05x | $1.80 Million | $34.80 Million | — |