Utah Medical Products Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Utah Medical Products Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Utah Medical Products Inc (UTMD) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.78x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $3.11 Million could theoretically repay 1% of its total liabilities ($4.01 Million) in one year. Check Utah Medical Products Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Utah Medical Products Inc (1989–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Utah Medical Products Inc from 1989 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Utah Medical Products Inc across 37 annual periods. Check total reinvestment intensity of Utah Medical Products Inc to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Utah Medical Products Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1989–2025)
Utah Medical Products Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1989 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Utah Medical Products Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see cash flow conversion of Utah Medical Products Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4.49x | $14.69 Million | $3.27 Million | ▲ +54.6% |
| 2024 | 2.90x | $14.83 Million | $5.11 Million | ▼ -6.9% |
| 2023 | 3.12x | $22.28 Million | $7.14 Million | ▲ +41.9% |
| 2022 | 2.20x | $21.15 Million | $9.62 Million | ▼ -11.9% |
| 2021 | 2.50x | $21.20 Million | $8.50 Million | ▲ +10.6% |
| 2020 | 2.26x | $20.14 Million | $8.92 Million | ▲ +15.0% |
| 2019 | 1.96x | $17.06 Million | $8.70 Million | ▲ +25.6% |
| 2018 | 1.56x | $16.83 Million | $10.78 Million | ▲ +35.1% |
| 2017 | 1.16x | $16.91 Million | $14.62 Million | ▼ -41.6% |
| 2016 | 1.98x | $14.53 Million | $7.34 Million | ▲ +36.6% |
| 2015 | 1.45x | $13.80 Million | $9.53 Million | ▲ +55.5% |
| 2014 | 0.93x | $15.39 Million | $16.52 Million | ▲ +52.3% |
| 2013 | 0.61x | $12.31 Million | $20.13 Million | ▲ +17.1% |
| 2012 | 0.52x | $13.56 Million | $25.96 Million | ▲ +63.8% |
| 2011 | 0.32x | $11.37 Million | $35.63 Million | ▼ -84.6% |
| 2010 | 2.08x | $7.16 Million | $3.45 Million | ▲ +8.4% |
| 2009 | 1.92x | $7.23 Million | $3.77 Million | ▼ -0.9% |
| 2008 | 1.93x | $7.76 Million | $4.02 Million | ▲ +86.1% |
| 2007 | 1.04x | $7.47 Million | $7.20 Million | ▼ -22.8% |
| 2006 | 1.34x | $10.85 Million | $8.07 Million | ▲ +83.1% |
| 2005 | 0.73x | $6.45 Million | $8.79 Million | ▼ -86.3% |
| 2004 | 5.38x | $27.46 Million | $5.11 Million | ▲ +749.4% |
| 2003 | 0.63x | $8.34 Million | $13.16 Million | ▼ -43.9% |
| 2002 | 1.13x | $8.66 Million | $7.67 Million | ▼ -22.9% |
| 2001 | 1.47x | $7.86 Million | $5.37 Million | ▲ +144.8% |
| 2000 | 0.60x | $7.83 Million | $13.08 Million | ▼ -41.0% |
| 1999 | 1.01x | $9.10 Million | $8.97 Million | ▼ -35.9% |
| 1998 | 1.58x | $9.50 Million | $6.00 Million | ▲ +181.8% |
| 1997 | 0.56x | $5.00 Million | $8.90 Million | ▼ -77.4% |
| 1996 | 2.49x | $11.20 Million | $4.50 Million | ▼ -8.1% |
| 1995 | 2.71x | $11.10 Million | $4.10 Million | ▲ +23.1% |
| 1994 | 2.20x | $8.80 Million | $4.00 Million | ▲ +4.1% |
| 1993 | 2.11x | $7.40 Million | $3.50 Million | ▲ +2.4% |
| 1992 | 2.06x | $6.40 Million | $3.10 Million | ▲ +101.2% |
| 1991 | 1.03x | $3.90 Million | $3.80 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 1990 | 0.71x | $2.90 Million | $4.10 Million | ▼ -19.4% |
| 1989 | 0.88x | $4.30 Million | $4.90 Million | — |