Value Line Inc (VALU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Value Line Inc (VALU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($43.20 Million) in one year. See Value Line Inc free cash flow efficiency to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Value Line Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Value Line Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Value Line Inc to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Value Line Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Value Line Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see VALU market cap.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | $20.24 Million | $44.85 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $17.93 Million | $45.24 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.38x | $18.18 Million | $47.40 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $24.65 Million | $49.10 Million | ▲ +65.6% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | $16.41 Million | $54.12 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $13.74 Million | $56.19 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $11.83 Million | $44.26 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $9.91 Million | $43.25 Million | ▲ +177.4% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $4.04 Million | $48.87 Million | ▲ +113.9% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $2.00 Million | $51.91 Million | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $1.41 Million | $52.98 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $3.49 Million | $53.58 Million | ▲ +186.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $1.17 Million | $51.36 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $2.38 Million | $52.05 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $10.66 Million | $54.55 Million | ▲ +187.0% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | $-8.66 Million | $38.54 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | $14.37 Million | $36.69 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.41x | $20.36 Million | $50.10 Million | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $25.18 Million | $53.39 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $18.92 Million | $57.28 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2005 | 0.67x | $36.59 Million | $54.72 Million | ▲ +616.1% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $21.63 Million | $231.63 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $16.82 Million | $51.44 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $20.14 Million | $72.73 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2001 | 0.36x | $25.65 Million | $70.79 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $19.64 Million | $87.33 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $24.60 Million | $76.90 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1998 | 0.29x | $20.40 Million | $70.60 Million | ▲ +56.5% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $11.80 Million | $63.90 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $30.10 Million | $112.50 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $27.20 Million | $91.80 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $22.50 Million | $52.90 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1993 | 0.58x | $29.00 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 1992 | 0.53x | $25.50 Million | $47.90 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 1991 | 0.43x | $20.10 Million | $46.60 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $10.40 Million | $41.20 Million | — |