Value Line Inc (VALU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Value Line Inc (VALU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($43.20 Million) in one year. Explore Value Line Inc strategic investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Value Line Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Value Line Inc across 36 annual periods. Also explore VALU asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Value Line Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Value Line Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Value Line Inc market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | $20.24 Million | $44.85 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $17.93 Million | $45.24 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.38x | $18.18 Million | $47.40 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $24.65 Million | $49.10 Million | ▲ +65.6% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | $16.41 Million | $54.12 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $13.74 Million | $56.19 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $11.83 Million | $44.26 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $9.91 Million | $43.25 Million | ▲ +177.4% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $4.04 Million | $48.87 Million | ▲ +113.9% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $2.00 Million | $51.91 Million | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $1.41 Million | $52.98 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $3.49 Million | $53.58 Million | ▲ +186.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $1.17 Million | $51.36 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $2.38 Million | $52.05 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $10.66 Million | $54.55 Million | ▲ +187.0% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | $-8.66 Million | $38.54 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | $14.37 Million | $36.69 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.41x | $20.36 Million | $50.10 Million | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $25.18 Million | $53.39 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $18.92 Million | $57.28 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2005 | 0.67x | $36.59 Million | $54.72 Million | ▲ +616.1% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $21.63 Million | $231.63 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $16.82 Million | $51.44 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $20.14 Million | $72.73 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2001 | 0.36x | $25.65 Million | $70.79 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $19.64 Million | $87.33 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $24.60 Million | $76.90 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1998 | 0.29x | $20.40 Million | $70.60 Million | ▲ +56.5% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $11.80 Million | $63.90 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $30.10 Million | $112.50 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $27.20 Million | $91.80 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $22.50 Million | $52.90 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1993 | 0.58x | $29.00 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 1992 | 0.53x | $25.50 Million | $47.90 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 1991 | 0.43x | $20.10 Million | $46.60 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $10.40 Million | $41.20 Million | — |