Value Line Inc (VALU) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Value Line Inc (VALU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.12x as of January 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $5.29 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($43.20 Million) in one year. See Value Line Inc leverage flexibility ratio to measure the company's free cash flow as a share of total liabilities.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Value Line Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Value Line Inc across 36 annual periods. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Value Line Inc (VALU) cash flow conversion.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Value Line Inc (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Value Line Inc. Check VALU cash flow quality score to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.45x | $20.24 Million | $44.85 Million | ▲ +13.9% |
| 2024 | 0.40x | $17.93 Million | $45.24 Million | ▲ +3.4% |
| 2023 | 0.38x | $18.18 Million | $47.40 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2022 | 0.50x | $24.65 Million | $49.10 Million | ▲ +65.6% |
| 2021 | 0.30x | $16.41 Million | $54.12 Million | ▲ +23.9% |
| 2020 | 0.24x | $13.74 Million | $56.19 Million | ▼ -8.5% |
| 2019 | 0.27x | $11.83 Million | $44.26 Million | ▲ +16.7% |
| 2018 | 0.23x | $9.91 Million | $43.25 Million | ▲ +177.4% |
| 2017 | 0.08x | $4.04 Million | $48.87 Million | ▲ +113.9% |
| 2016 | 0.04x | $2.00 Million | $51.91 Million | ▲ +45.4% |
| 2015 | 0.03x | $1.41 Million | $52.98 Million | ▼ -59.2% |
| 2014 | 0.07x | $3.49 Million | $53.58 Million | ▲ +186.2% |
| 2013 | 0.02x | $1.17 Million | $51.36 Million | ▼ -50.2% |
| 2012 | 0.05x | $2.38 Million | $52.05 Million | ▼ -76.6% |
| 2011 | 0.20x | $10.66 Million | $54.55 Million | ▲ +187.0% |
| 2010 | -0.22x | $-8.66 Million | $38.54 Million | ▼ -157.3% |
| 2009 | 0.39x | $14.37 Million | $36.69 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.41x | $20.36 Million | $50.10 Million | ▼ -13.8% |
| 2007 | 0.47x | $25.18 Million | $53.39 Million | ▲ +42.8% |
| 2006 | 0.33x | $18.92 Million | $57.28 Million | ▼ -50.6% |
| 2005 | 0.67x | $36.59 Million | $54.72 Million | ▲ +616.1% |
| 2004 | 0.09x | $21.63 Million | $231.63 Million | ▼ -71.4% |
| 2003 | 0.33x | $16.82 Million | $51.44 Million | ▲ +18.0% |
| 2002 | 0.28x | $20.14 Million | $72.73 Million | ▼ -23.6% |
| 2001 | 0.36x | $25.65 Million | $70.79 Million | ▲ +61.1% |
| 2000 | 0.22x | $19.64 Million | $87.33 Million | ▼ -29.7% |
| 1999 | 0.32x | $24.60 Million | $76.90 Million | ▲ +10.7% |
| 1998 | 0.29x | $20.40 Million | $70.60 Million | ▲ +56.5% |
| 1997 | 0.18x | $11.80 Million | $63.90 Million | ▼ -31.0% |
| 1996 | 0.27x | $30.10 Million | $112.50 Million | ▼ -9.7% |
| 1995 | 0.30x | $27.20 Million | $91.80 Million | ▼ -30.3% |
| 1994 | 0.43x | $22.50 Million | $52.90 Million | ▼ -27.1% |
| 1993 | 0.58x | $29.00 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +9.6% |
| 1992 | 0.53x | $25.50 Million | $47.90 Million | ▲ +23.4% |
| 1991 | 0.43x | $20.10 Million | $46.60 Million | ▲ +70.9% |
| 1990 | 0.25x | $10.40 Million | $41.20 Million | — |