Veru Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Veru Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Veru Inc (VERU) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.59x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-6.17 Million could theoretically repay -1% of its total liabilities ($10.44 Million) in one year. Check Veru Inc (VERU) cash flow quality to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Veru Inc (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Veru Inc from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Veru Inc across 36 annual periods. Check Veru Inc investment reinvestment rate to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Veru Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Veru Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Veru Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Veru Inc operating cash flow efficiency.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -2.61x | $-30.04 Million | $11.50 Million | ▼ -238.5% |
| 2024 | -0.77x | $-21.68 Million | $28.10 Million | ▲ +73.4% |
| 2023 | -2.90x | $-88.01 Million | $30.34 Million | ▼ -220.9% |
| 2022 | -0.90x | $-47.51 Million | $52.56 Million | ▼ -50.1% |
| 2021 | -0.60x | $-15.57 Million | $25.85 Million | ▼ -568.8% |
| 2020 | -0.09x | $-1.93 Million | $21.43 Million | ▲ +65.0% |
| 2019 | -0.26x | $-5.49 Million | $21.30 Million | ▲ +57.7% |
| 2018 | -0.61x | $-11.55 Million | $18.97 Million | ▼ -524.4% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $982.89K | $6.85 Million | ▲ +139.2% |
| 2016 | -0.37x | $-1.71 Million | $4.69 Million | ▼ -2.4% |
| 2015 | -0.36x | $-1.55 Million | $4.34 Million | ▼ -135.1% |
| 2014 | 1.02x | $3.67 Million | $3.61 Million | ▼ -67.5% |
| 2013 | 3.13x | $11.79 Million | $3.77 Million | ▲ +88.3% |
| 2012 | 1.66x | $10.36 Million | $6.23 Million | ▼ -35.8% |
| 2011 | 2.59x | $6.97 Million | $2.69 Million | ▲ +45.1% |
| 2010 | 1.79x | $3.99 Million | $2.24 Million | ▲ +73.5% |
| 2009 | 1.03x | $5.75 Million | $5.59 Million | ▼ -0.1% |
| 2008 | 1.03x | $4.24 Million | $4.12 Million | ▲ +9274.9% |
| 2007 | -0.01x | $-42.05K | $3.75 Million | ▼ -111.2% |
| 2006 | 0.10x | $267.94K | $2.67 Million | ▲ +219.2% |
| 2005 | -0.08x | $-199.26K | $2.37 Million | ▼ -3.6% |
| 2004 | -0.08x | $-216.76K | $2.67 Million | ▼ -227.2% |
| 2003 | 0.06x | $290.01K | $4.54 Million | ▲ +183.2% |
| 2002 | -0.08x | $-378.65K | $4.93 Million | ▲ +47.5% |
| 2001 | -0.15x | $-625.02K | $4.28 Million | ▲ +31.8% |
| 2000 | -0.21x | $-1.03 Million | $4.81 Million | ▲ +63.9% |
| 1999 | -0.59x | $-2.84 Million | $4.78 Million | ▲ +0.2% |
| 1998 | -0.60x | $-2.75 Million | $4.62 Million | ▲ +49.2% |
| 1997 | -1.17x | $-5.61 Million | $4.78 Million | ▼ -78.1% |
| 1996 | -0.66x | $-4.07 Million | $6.19 Million | ▲ +11.3% |
| 1995 | -0.74x | $-4.60 Million | $6.20 Million | ▲ +43.2% |
| 1994 | -1.31x | $-7.70 Million | $5.90 Million | ▼ -3884.7% |
| 1993 | 0.03x | $200.00K | $5.80 Million | ▲ +107.9% |
| 1992 | -0.43x | $-2.00 Million | $4.60 Million | ▼ -38.3% |
| 1991 | -0.31x | $-1.10 Million | $3.50 Million | ▼ -414.3% |
| 1990 | 0.10x | $300.00K | $3.00 Million | — |