Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.07x as of December 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $357.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.91 Billion) in one year. See ZBRA free cash flow to operating cash ratio to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Zebra Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Zebra Technologies Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore net asset growth rate of Zebra Technologies Corporation to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Zebra Technologies Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zebra Technologies Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market value of Zebra Technologies Corporation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | $917.00 Million | $4.91 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | $1.01 Billion | $4.38 Billion | ▲ +24777.7% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $-4.00 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▼ -100.9% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $488.00 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | $1.07 Billion | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | $962.00 Million | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $685.00 Million | $2.87 Billion | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | $785.00 Million | $3.00 Billion | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $478.00 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $372.00 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +288.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $102.58 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $240.32 Million | $4.53 Billion | ▼ -95.6% |
| 2013 | 1.21x | $194.77 Million | $161.15 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2012 | 1.66x | $183.33 Million | $110.75 Million | ▲ +153.8% |
| 2011 | 0.65x | $79.62 Million | $122.08 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2010 | 0.94x | $140.46 Million | $148.83 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2009 | 0.89x | $105.70 Million | $118.35 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.89x | $125.21 Million | $140.14 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2007 | 1.20x | $158.12 Million | $131.59 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2006 | 1.03x | $88.25 Million | $85.46 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2005 | 1.50x | $92.59 Million | $61.69 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2004 | 1.72x | $111.26 Million | $64.57 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2003 | 2.10x | $104.52 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +711.4% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | $-13.39 Million | $38.93 Million | ▼ -184.4% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | $14.08 Million | $34.55 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 2000 | 2.81x | $133.92 Million | $47.61 Million | ▲ +454.0% |
| 1999 | 0.51x | $23.00 Million | $45.30 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 1998 | 0.81x | $31.70 Million | $39.10 Million | ▲ +467.1% |
| 1997 | -0.22x | $-5.30 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -435.7% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $1.50 Million | $22.80 Million | ▼ -87.1% |
| 1995 | 0.51x | $11.70 Million | $22.90 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 1994 | 2.58x | $33.60 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +312.0% |
| 1993 | 0.63x | $10.10 Million | $16.10 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 1992 | 1.01x | $12.70 Million | $12.60 Million | ▲ +66.8% |
| 1991 | 0.60x | $11.00 Million | $18.20 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 1990 | 2.19x | $9.40 Million | $4.30 Million | — |