Zebra Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Zebra Technologies Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio. Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $176.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.86 Billion) in one year. Check Zebra Technologies Corporation cash flow quality index to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Zebra Technologies Corporation (1990–2025)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Zebra Technologies Corporation from 1990 to 2025. Historical debt coverage capacity for Zebra Technologies Corporation across 36 annual periods. Check Zebra Technologies Corporation total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
Zebra Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1990–2025)
Zebra Technologies Corporation cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1990 to 2025. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zebra Technologies Corporation. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see ZBRA cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | $917.00 Million | $4.91 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | $1.01 Billion | $4.38 Billion | ▲ +24777.7% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $-4.00 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▼ -100.9% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $488.00 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | $1.07 Billion | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | $962.00 Million | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $685.00 Million | $2.87 Billion | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | $785.00 Million | $3.00 Billion | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $478.00 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $372.00 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +288.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $102.58 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $240.32 Million | $4.53 Billion | ▼ -95.6% |
| 2013 | 1.21x | $194.77 Million | $161.15 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2012 | 1.66x | $183.33 Million | $110.75 Million | ▲ +153.8% |
| 2011 | 0.65x | $79.62 Million | $122.08 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2010 | 0.94x | $140.46 Million | $148.83 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2009 | 0.89x | $105.70 Million | $118.35 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.89x | $125.21 Million | $140.14 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2007 | 1.20x | $158.12 Million | $131.59 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2006 | 1.03x | $88.25 Million | $85.46 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2005 | 1.50x | $92.59 Million | $61.69 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2004 | 1.72x | $111.26 Million | $64.57 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2003 | 2.10x | $104.52 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +711.4% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | $-13.39 Million | $38.93 Million | ▼ -184.4% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | $14.08 Million | $34.55 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 2000 | 2.81x | $133.92 Million | $47.61 Million | ▲ +454.0% |
| 1999 | 0.51x | $23.00 Million | $45.30 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 1998 | 0.81x | $31.70 Million | $39.10 Million | ▲ +467.1% |
| 1997 | -0.22x | $-5.30 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -435.7% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $1.50 Million | $22.80 Million | ▼ -87.1% |
| 1995 | 0.51x | $11.70 Million | $22.90 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 1994 | 2.58x | $33.60 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +312.0% |
| 1993 | 0.63x | $10.10 Million | $16.10 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 1992 | 1.01x | $12.70 Million | $12.60 Million | ▲ +66.8% |
| 1991 | 0.60x | $11.00 Million | $18.20 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 1990 | 2.19x | $9.40 Million | $4.30 Million | — |