Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Zebra Technologies Corporation (ZBRA) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.04x as of March 2026, meaning its operating cash flow of $176.00 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($4.86 Billion) in one year. Explore ZBRA long-term asset investment ratio to see how much of total assets are deployed in long-term investments.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Zebra Technologies Corporation Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1990–2025)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Zebra Technologies Corporation across 36 annual periods. Also explore total assets of Zebra Technologies Corporation for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Zebra Technologies Corporation (1990–2025)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Zebra Technologies Corporation. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Zebra Technologies Corporation market capitalisation.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 0.19x | $917.00 Million | $4.91 Billion | ▼ -19.3% |
| 2024 | 0.23x | $1.01 Billion | $4.38 Billion | ▲ +24777.7% |
| 2023 | 0.00x | $-4.00 Million | $4.27 Billion | ▼ -100.9% |
| 2022 | 0.10x | $488.00 Million | $4.80 Billion | ▼ -69.2% |
| 2021 | 0.33x | $1.07 Billion | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +11.1% |
| 2020 | 0.30x | $962.00 Million | $3.23 Billion | ▲ +24.8% |
| 2019 | 0.24x | $685.00 Million | $2.87 Billion | ▼ -8.7% |
| 2018 | 0.26x | $785.00 Million | $3.00 Billion | ▲ +88.1% |
| 2017 | 0.14x | $478.00 Million | $3.44 Billion | ▲ +43.4% |
| 2016 | 0.10x | $372.00 Million | $3.84 Billion | ▲ +288.3% |
| 2015 | 0.02x | $102.58 Million | $4.11 Billion | ▼ -53.0% |
| 2014 | 0.05x | $240.32 Million | $4.53 Billion | ▼ -95.6% |
| 2013 | 1.21x | $194.77 Million | $161.15 Million | ▼ -27.0% |
| 2012 | 1.66x | $183.33 Million | $110.75 Million | ▲ +153.8% |
| 2011 | 0.65x | $79.62 Million | $122.08 Million | ▼ -30.9% |
| 2010 | 0.94x | $140.46 Million | $148.83 Million | ▲ +5.7% |
| 2009 | 0.89x | $105.70 Million | $118.35 Million | ▼ 0.0% |
| 2008 | 0.89x | $125.21 Million | $140.14 Million | ▼ -25.6% |
| 2007 | 1.20x | $158.12 Million | $131.59 Million | ▲ +16.4% |
| 2006 | 1.03x | $88.25 Million | $85.46 Million | ▼ -31.2% |
| 2005 | 1.50x | $92.59 Million | $61.69 Million | ▼ -12.9% |
| 2004 | 1.72x | $111.26 Million | $64.57 Million | ▼ -18.1% |
| 2003 | 2.10x | $104.52 Million | $49.70 Million | ▲ +711.4% |
| 2002 | -0.34x | $-13.39 Million | $38.93 Million | ▼ -184.4% |
| 2001 | 0.41x | $14.08 Million | $34.55 Million | ▼ -85.5% |
| 2000 | 2.81x | $133.92 Million | $47.61 Million | ▲ +454.0% |
| 1999 | 0.51x | $23.00 Million | $45.30 Million | ▼ -37.4% |
| 1998 | 0.81x | $31.70 Million | $39.10 Million | ▲ +467.1% |
| 1997 | -0.22x | $-5.30 Million | $24.00 Million | ▼ -435.7% |
| 1996 | 0.07x | $1.50 Million | $22.80 Million | ▼ -87.1% |
| 1995 | 0.51x | $11.70 Million | $22.90 Million | ▼ -80.2% |
| 1994 | 2.58x | $33.60 Million | $13.00 Million | ▲ +312.0% |
| 1993 | 0.63x | $10.10 Million | $16.10 Million | ▼ -37.8% |
| 1992 | 1.01x | $12.70 Million | $12.60 Million | ▲ +66.8% |
| 1991 | 0.60x | $11.00 Million | $18.20 Million | ▼ -72.4% |
| 1990 | 2.19x | $9.40 Million | $4.30 Million | — |