Olympic Steel Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Olympic Steel Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio. Olympic Steel Inc (ZEUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($510.93 Million) in one year. Check ZEUS cash reinvestment to operating cash ratio to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of Olympic Steel Inc (1994–2024)
Cash flow-to-debt ratio of Olympic Steel Inc from 1994 to 2024. Historical debt coverage capacity for Olympic Steel Inc across 31 annual periods. Check Olympic Steel Inc earnings quality ratio to evaluate the quality of earnings relative to operating cash generation.
Olympic Steel Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio by Year (1994–2024)
Olympic Steel Inc cash flow-to-debt ratio by year from 1994 to 2024. Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olympic Steel Inc. For the full cash flow conversion analysis, see Olympic Steel Inc (ZEUS) cash flow conversion.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | $33.68 Million | $470.57 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $175.16 Million | $429.36 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | $185.85 Million | $375.66 Million | ▲ +302.5% |
| 2021 | -0.24x | $-146.37 Million | $599.13 Million | ▼ -234.6% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $61.65 Million | $339.60 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2019 | 0.38x | $129.56 Million | $341.20 Million | ▲ +441.2% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-50.50 Million | $453.75 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2017 | -0.06x | $-19.04 Million | $331.57 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | $-9.81 Million | $302.68 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | $107.48 Million | $258.77 Million | ▲ +540.7% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-39.58 Million | $419.97 Million | ▼ -168.7% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $54.68 Million | $398.73 Million | ▲ +108.7% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $27.35 Million | $416.14 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $15.84 Million | $420.92 Million | ▲ +115.6% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-40.43 Million | $167.80 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.85x | $67.39 Million | $78.84 Million | ▲ +1972.8% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $6.24 Million | $151.29 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | $64.68 Million | $122.56 Million | ▲ +277.7% |
| 2006 | -0.30x | $-50.80 Million | $171.08 Million | ▼ -135.9% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | $87.04 Million | $105.28 Million | ▲ +4617.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $3.46 Million | $197.62 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $9.55 Million | $136.77 Million | ▲ +152.7% |
| 2002 | -0.13x | $-19.55 Million | $147.42 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-13.24 Million | $114.14 Million | ▼ -135.1% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $33.04 Million | $100.01 Million | ▲ +4201.6% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $130.20 Million | ▼ -97.1% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $31.00 Million | $118.40 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $25.50 Million | $119.30 Million | ▲ +22086.9% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $103.80 Million | ▼ -99.8% |
| 1995 | 0.47x | $59.80 Million | $128.10 Million | ▲ +447.0% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | $-18.00 Million | $133.80 Million | — |