Olympic Steel Inc (ZEUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Olympic Steel Inc (ZEUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($510.93 Million) in one year. See cash generation quality of Olympic Steel Inc to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Olympic Steel Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Olympic Steel Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore Olympic Steel Inc (ZEUS) equity growth momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Olympic Steel Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olympic Steel Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see market cap of Olympic Steel Inc.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | $33.68 Million | $470.57 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $175.16 Million | $429.36 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | $185.85 Million | $375.66 Million | ▲ +302.5% |
| 2021 | -0.24x | $-146.37 Million | $599.13 Million | ▼ -234.6% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $61.65 Million | $339.60 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2019 | 0.38x | $129.56 Million | $341.20 Million | ▲ +441.2% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-50.50 Million | $453.75 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2017 | -0.06x | $-19.04 Million | $331.57 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | $-9.81 Million | $302.68 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | $107.48 Million | $258.77 Million | ▲ +540.7% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-39.58 Million | $419.97 Million | ▼ -168.7% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $54.68 Million | $398.73 Million | ▲ +108.7% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $27.35 Million | $416.14 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $15.84 Million | $420.92 Million | ▲ +115.6% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-40.43 Million | $167.80 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.85x | $67.39 Million | $78.84 Million | ▲ +1972.8% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $6.24 Million | $151.29 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | $64.68 Million | $122.56 Million | ▲ +277.7% |
| 2006 | -0.30x | $-50.80 Million | $171.08 Million | ▼ -135.9% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | $87.04 Million | $105.28 Million | ▲ +4617.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $3.46 Million | $197.62 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $9.55 Million | $136.77 Million | ▲ +152.7% |
| 2002 | -0.13x | $-19.55 Million | $147.42 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-13.24 Million | $114.14 Million | ▼ -135.1% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $33.04 Million | $100.01 Million | ▲ +4201.6% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $130.20 Million | ▼ -97.1% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $31.00 Million | $118.40 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $25.50 Million | $119.30 Million | ▲ +22086.9% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $103.80 Million | ▼ -99.8% |
| 1995 | 0.47x | $59.80 Million | $128.10 Million | ▲ +447.0% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | $-18.00 Million | $133.80 Million | — |