Olympic Steel Inc (ZEUS) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio
Olympic Steel Inc (ZEUS) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of -0.01x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of $-5.39 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities ($510.93 Million) in one year. Check Olympic Steel Inc total reinvestment intensity to assess the company's total reinvestment commitment from operating cash flow.
CF-to-Debt Ratio
Operating Cash Flow
Total Liabilities
Data as of
Olympic Steel Inc Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (1994–2024)
Historical debt coverage capacity for Olympic Steel Inc across 31 annual periods. Also explore ZEUS asset base for the complete picture of this company's asset base.
Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Olympic Steel Inc (1994–2024)
Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Olympic Steel Inc. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see how much is Olympic Steel Inc worth.
| Year | CF-to-Debt Ratio | Operating CF (USD) | Total Liabilities | YoY Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 0.07x | $33.68 Million | $470.57 Million | ▼ -82.5% |
| 2023 | 0.41x | $175.16 Million | $429.36 Million | ▼ -17.5% |
| 2022 | 0.49x | $185.85 Million | $375.66 Million | ▲ +302.5% |
| 2021 | -0.24x | $-146.37 Million | $599.13 Million | ▼ -234.6% |
| 2020 | 0.18x | $61.65 Million | $339.60 Million | ▼ -52.2% |
| 2019 | 0.38x | $129.56 Million | $341.20 Million | ▲ +441.2% |
| 2018 | -0.11x | $-50.50 Million | $453.75 Million | ▼ -93.8% |
| 2017 | -0.06x | $-19.04 Million | $331.57 Million | ▼ -77.1% |
| 2016 | -0.03x | $-9.81 Million | $302.68 Million | ▼ -107.8% |
| 2015 | 0.42x | $107.48 Million | $258.77 Million | ▲ +540.7% |
| 2014 | -0.09x | $-39.58 Million | $419.97 Million | ▼ -168.7% |
| 2013 | 0.14x | $54.68 Million | $398.73 Million | ▲ +108.7% |
| 2012 | 0.07x | $27.35 Million | $416.14 Million | ▲ +74.6% |
| 2011 | 0.04x | $15.84 Million | $420.92 Million | ▲ +115.6% |
| 2010 | -0.24x | $-40.43 Million | $167.80 Million | ▼ -128.2% |
| 2009 | 0.85x | $67.39 Million | $78.84 Million | ▲ +1972.8% |
| 2008 | 0.04x | $6.24 Million | $151.29 Million | ▼ -92.2% |
| 2007 | 0.53x | $64.68 Million | $122.56 Million | ▲ +277.7% |
| 2006 | -0.30x | $-50.80 Million | $171.08 Million | ▼ -135.9% |
| 2005 | 0.83x | $87.04 Million | $105.28 Million | ▲ +4617.9% |
| 2004 | 0.02x | $3.46 Million | $197.62 Million | ▼ -74.9% |
| 2003 | 0.07x | $9.55 Million | $136.77 Million | ▲ +152.7% |
| 2002 | -0.13x | $-19.55 Million | $147.42 Million | ▼ -14.3% |
| 2001 | -0.12x | $-13.24 Million | $114.14 Million | ▼ -135.1% |
| 2000 | 0.33x | $33.04 Million | $100.01 Million | ▲ +4201.6% |
| 1999 | 0.01x | $1.00 Million | $130.20 Million | ▼ -97.1% |
| 1998 | 0.26x | $31.00 Million | $118.40 Million | ▲ +22.5% |
| 1997 | 0.21x | $25.50 Million | $119.30 Million | ▲ +22086.9% |
| 1996 | 0.00x | $100.00K | $103.80 Million | ▼ -99.8% |
| 1995 | 0.47x | $59.80 Million | $128.10 Million | ▲ +447.0% |
| 1994 | -0.13x | $-18.00 Million | $133.80 Million | — |