Uniinfo Telecom Services Limited (UNIINFO) — Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio

Latest as of September 2025: 0.09x

Uniinfo Telecom Services Limited (UNIINFO) has a Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio of 0.09x as of September 2025, meaning its operating cash flow of Rs9.43 Million could theoretically repay 0% of its total liabilities (Rs99.34 Million) in one year. See Uniinfo Telecom Services Limited (UNIINFO) free cash flow to measure how efficiently the company converts operating cash flow to free cash.

CF-to-Debt Ratio

0.09x
Operating CF / Total Liabilities

Operating Cash Flow

Rs9.43 Million
INR

Total Liabilities

Rs99.34 Million
INR

Data as of

Sep 2025
Most recent filing

Uniinfo Telecom Services Limited Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio (2013–2025)

Historical debt coverage capacity for Uniinfo Telecom Services Limited across 13 annual periods. Also explore UNIINFO net asset momentum to track the company's year-over-year net asset growth rate.

Annual Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio for Uniinfo Telecom Services Limited (2013–2025)

Year-by-year debt coverage analysis for Uniinfo Telecom Services Limited. For market capitalisation and broader financial context, see Uniinfo Telecom Services Limited market cap and net worth.

Year CF-to-Debt Ratio Operating CF (INR) Total Liabilities YoY Change
2025 -0.31x Rs-25.95 Million Rs82.87 Million ▼ -146.0%
2024 0.68x Rs30.04 Million Rs44.14 Million ▲ +359.9%
2023 0.15x Rs15.37 Million Rs103.86 Million ▲ +265.3%
2022 -0.09x Rs-6.50 Million Rs72.57 Million ▼ -137.0%
2021 0.24x Rs24.21 Million Rs99.98 Million ▲ +19.3%
2020 0.20x Rs15.30 Million Rs75.39 Million ▲ +447.7%
2019 -0.06x Rs-9.70 Million Rs166.17 Million ▼ -265.4%
2018 0.04x Rs5.77 Million Rs163.45 Million ▲ +118.8%
2017 -0.19x Rs-46.03 Million Rs245.75 Million ▲ +42.0%
2016 -0.32x Rs-50.90 Million Rs157.60 Million ▼ -146.9%
2015 -0.13x Rs-7.10 Million Rs54.31 Million ▲ +50.9%
2014 -0.27x Rs-6.66 Million Rs25.02 Million ▲ +57.5%
2013 -0.63x Rs-6.45 Million Rs10.30 Million
Cash Flow-to-Debt Ratio = Operating Cash Flow / Total Liabilities. Higher is better for debt service capacity.